Phronesis: a especificidade da compreensão moral
Abstract
Este artigo retoma o conceito aristotélico da phronesis, conforme propõe Hans-Georg Gadamer, em Verdade e método (1960), com vistas a enfrentar a oposição entre o caráter universal dos princípios morais abstratos e a particularidade dos contextos históricos e da autocriação do eu. O interesse específico é utilizar a revalorização da phronesis, a deliberação prudente, enquanto compreensão prática, que pode auxiliar no enfrentamento da tensão gerada no processo educativo entre a criação do eu singular e a integração na comunidade (ethos comum).
Descritores
– Ética; phronesis; educação ético-estética; autocriação do eu.
ABSTRACT
Phronesis: the moralcomprehension specificity
This article resumes the Aristotelic concept of phronesis, according to Hans-Georg Gadamer’s view in Verdade e método (1960), where he faces the opposition between the universal character of the abstract moral principles and the particularity of the historical contexts and the self auto-creation. The specific interest is to use the revaluation of the phronesis, the prudent deliberation, as a practical comprehension that might help to deal with the tension generated in the educative process, between the creation of the singular self and the integration in the community (common ethos).
Key words – Ethics; phronesis; ethical-esthetic education; self auto-creation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Educação implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Educação as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.