Prolegômenos para uma genealogia das relações-mundo

James William Santos

doi:10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.48808

Authors

James William Santos Universtiy of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-1172

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.48808

Keywords:

Resonance, Alienation, Acceleration, Genealogy, World-relations

Abstract

This essay argues that Hartmut Rosa’s dual diagnosis of modernity, comprising the alienating forces of social acceleration and the emancipatory potential of resonance, serves as a prolegomenon for a genealogy of world-relations. Although Rosa advocates for a genealogical approach, he does not fully develop it. It traces how his major works lay the conceptual groundwork for an emancipatory critique that is genealogical in nature. Drawing on Martin Saar’s stylistic dimension of genealogy and Michel Foucault’s notion of effective history, the outline of the initial steps toward realizing a genealogy of world-relations is provided. The provisional outcome aims at an expansion of the scope of Rosa’s work to substantiate the analysis of diverse social dynamics and a synthesis of his core concepts into a critical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

James William Santos, Universtiy of Erfurt, Erfurt, Thuringia, Germany.

Postdoctoral researcher at the Max-Weber-Kolleg, Universität Erfurt, Germany. PhD and Master's degree in Social Sciences from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

References

Allen, Amy. 2008. The politics of ourselves: power, autonomy, and gender in contemporary critical theory. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/alle13622

Allen, Amy. 2016. The end of progress: decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/alle17324

Dean, Mitchell. 1994. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and Historical Sociology. Routledge.

Epstein, Brian. 2010. History and the critique of social concepts. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40(1): 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350678

Evans, Fred. 2001. Genealogy and the problem of affirmation in Nietzsche, Foucault and Bakhtin. Philosophy & Social Criticism 27(3): 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700303

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard. Cornell University Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2001. Power. Translated by James D. Faubion. New Press.

Geuss, Raymond. 2002. Genealogy as critique. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00157

Hanemaayer, Ariane. 2018. Genealogy as a counter‐human science. Canadian Review of Sociology 55(2): 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12197

Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Blackwell Publishers.

Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. Translated by William Lovitt. Garland Publishing, Inc.

Heidegger, Martin. 1982. The basic problems of phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Indiana University Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the concept of time: prolegomena. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Indiana University Press.

Jaeggi, Rahel. 2014. Alienation. Columbia University Press.

Koopman, Colin. 2013. Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/6546.0

May, Todd. 2014. Genealogy, problematization, and normativity in Michel Foucault. History and Theory 53(3): 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10721

Rosa, Hartmut. 2012. ‘Weiße’ und ‘schwarze’ genealogie: affirmative und pejorative Wertgeschichten bei Taylor und Foucault. In Perspektiven der Aufklärung: zwischen Mythos und Realität, edited by Michael Hofmann and Katja Stopka. Meidenbauer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846752043_003

Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity. Translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834

Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonance: a sociology of our relationship to the world. Translated by James C. Wagner. Polity Press.

Rosa, Hartmut. 2023. Resonance as a medio-passive, emancipatory and transformative power: a reply to my critics. The Journal of Chinese Sociology 10(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00195-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00195-4

Saar, Martin. 2002. Genealogy and subjectivity. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00159

Saar, Martin. 2007. Genealogie als Kritik: Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Campus Verlag.

Saar, Martin. 2008. Understanding genealogy: history, power, and the Self. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2(3): 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335976

Santos, James William. 2025. Foucault’s genealogical normative stance. Thesis Eleven. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251335664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251335664

Santos, James William, and Emil Albert Sobottka. 2023. Genealogy, immanent critique and forms of life: a path for decolonial studies. Human Affairs 33(1): 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034

Sartori, Andrew. 2020. Genealogy, critical theory, history. Critical Historical Studies 7(1): 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1086/707986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/707986

Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Harvard University Press.