Prolegômenos para uma genealogia das relações-mundo

James William Santos

doi:10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.48808

Autores/as

James William Santos Universidad de Erfurt, Erfurt, Turingia, Alemania. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-1172

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.48808

Palabras clave:

Resonancia, Alienación, Aceleración, Genealogía, Relaciones-mundo

Resumen

Este ensayo argumenta que el doble diagnóstico de la modernidad de Hartmut Rosa —la comprensión de las fuerzas alienantes de la aceleración social y el potencial emancipador de la resonancia— sirve como prólogo a una genealogía de las relaciones mundiales. Si bien Rosa defiende un enfoque genealógico, no lo desarrolla plenamente. El ensayo analiza cómo sus obras principales sientan las bases conceptuales para una crítica emancipadora de naturaleza genealógica. Basándose en la dimensión estilística de la genealogía de Martin Saar y la noción de historia efectiva de Michel Foucault, el ensayo describe los pasos iniciales para concretar una genealogía de las relaciones-mundo. El resultado provisional busca ampliar el alcance de la obra de Rosa para fundamentar el análisis de diversas dinámicas sociales y una síntesis de sus conceptos centrales en una práctica crítica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

James William Santos, Universidad de Erfurt, Erfurt, Turingia, Alemania.

Investigador postdoctoral en el Max-Weber-Kolleg de la Universidad de Erfurt, Alemania. Doctorado y maestría en Ciencias Sociales por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Citas

Allen, Amy. 2008. The politics of ourselves: power, autonomy, and gender in contemporary critical theory. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/alle13622

Allen, Amy. 2016. The end of progress: decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/alle17324

Dean, Mitchell. 1994. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and Historical Sociology. Routledge.

Epstein, Brian. 2010. History and the critique of social concepts. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40(1): 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350678

Evans, Fred. 2001. Genealogy and the problem of affirmation in Nietzsche, Foucault and Bakhtin. Philosophy & Social Criticism 27(3): 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700303

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard. Cornell University Press.

Foucault, Michel. 2001. Power. Translated by James D. Faubion. New Press.

Geuss, Raymond. 2002. Genealogy as critique. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00157

Hanemaayer, Ariane. 2018. Genealogy as a counter‐human science. Canadian Review of Sociology 55(2): 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12197

Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Blackwell Publishers.

Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. Translated by William Lovitt. Garland Publishing, Inc.

Heidegger, Martin. 1982. The basic problems of phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Indiana University Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the concept of time: prolegomena. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Indiana University Press.

Jaeggi, Rahel. 2014. Alienation. Columbia University Press.

Koopman, Colin. 2013. Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/6546.0

May, Todd. 2014. Genealogy, problematization, and normativity in Michel Foucault. History and Theory 53(3): 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10721

Rosa, Hartmut. 2012. ‘Weiße’ und ‘schwarze’ genealogie: affirmative und pejorative Wertgeschichten bei Taylor und Foucault. In Perspektiven der Aufklärung: zwischen Mythos und Realität, edited by Michael Hofmann and Katja Stopka. Meidenbauer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846752043_003

Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity. Translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834

Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonance: a sociology of our relationship to the world. Translated by James C. Wagner. Polity Press.

Rosa, Hartmut. 2023. Resonance as a medio-passive, emancipatory and transformative power: a reply to my critics. The Journal of Chinese Sociology 10(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00195-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00195-4

Saar, Martin. 2002. Genealogy and subjectivity. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00159

Saar, Martin. 2007. Genealogie als Kritik: Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Campus Verlag.

Saar, Martin. 2008. Understanding genealogy: history, power, and the Self. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2(3): 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335976

Santos, James William. 2025. Foucault’s genealogical normative stance. Thesis Eleven. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251335664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251335664

Santos, James William, and Emil Albert Sobottka. 2023. Genealogy, immanent critique and forms of life: a path for decolonial studies. Human Affairs 33(1): 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034

Sartori, Andrew. 2020. Genealogy, critical theory, history. Critical Historical Studies 7(1): 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1086/707986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/707986

Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Harvard University Press.