Dangerous relations: self-help, media and biopower

Authors

  • Ieda Tucherman UFRJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2012.2.12316

Keywords:

Self help, media, subjectivity, capitalism, biopower

Abstract

The self-help phenomenon deserves our interest as communication sciences research. Its immediate visibility can be founded on the numerous publications about self-help being produced in Brazil and all over the world with expressive numbers printed; besides it is present in many literary genders, conquers audio-visual products and generates social behaviors as the trend, such as Cabala and other oriental mysticisms. This great success can be understood in relation to capitalist reality nowadays, when each man should be the entrepreneur of himself, improving competences that could increase his biocapital and excluding habits that could depreciate it. Self-help presents itself with two goals axis, the first one is related to food for the soul, in which key words would be: self-esteem, self-knowledge, comfort and happiness; the second one is of pragmatic nature, identified by success, money, prestige, beauty and health. In that manner, achieves a marketing operation, one emotional narrative compatible with biopower.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAUER, Martin W.; GASKELL, Georges. Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2003.

BOLTANSKI, Luc; CHIAFELLO, Éve, O novo espírito do capitalismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2008.

BRAGANÇA DE MIRANDA, José. A cultura como problema. In: Tendências da Cultura Contemporânea, revista de Comunicação e Linguagens, Lisboa: Relógio d’Água, n. 28, out. 2000.

BUKATMAN, Scott. Terminal identity – The virtual subject in post-modern science fiction. New York: Duke University Press, 1993.

CANGUILLEN, Georges. La santé: concept vulgaire et question philosophique. Paris: Sable, 1990.

CASTEL, Robert. A insegurança social: o que é ser protegido? Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2003.

DOUGLAS, Mary. Pureza e perigo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1991.

EHRENBERG, Alain. La fatigue d´être soi. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2000.

______. La societé du malaise, Paris: Odile Jacob, 2010.

FOUCAULT, Michel. A vontade de saber, História da Sexualidade I. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1984.

______. Le Souci de Soi – Histoire de la Sexualité III. Paris: Gallimard, 1984.

______. Naissance de la biopolitique, Cours au Collège de France, 1978-1979. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004.

FREIRE FILHO, João (Org.). Ser feliz hoje: reflexões sobre o imperativo da felicidade. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2010.

MANSFIED, Nick. Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. New York: New York University Press, 2000.

MOSCOVICI, Serge. A representação social da psicanálise. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1978.

RABINOV, Paul. Artificiality and Enlightment, from sociobiology to biosociality. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996.

ROSE, Nicholas. The politics of life itself. Biomedicine, power and subjetctivity in the twenty-first century. New Jersey: Princeton University Express, 2007.

SALMON, Christian. Kate Moss machine. Paris: Ed de la Découverte, 2010.

SLOTERDIJK, Peter. Regras para o parque humano. São Paulo: Estação Liberdade, 2000.

STEINER, Georges (Org.). A ciência terá limites? Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2008.

TAYLOR, Charles. As fontes do self: a construção da identidade moderna. Rio de Janeiro: Loyola, 1997.

TUCHERMAN, Ieda. Breve história do corpo e de seus monstros. Lisboa: Veja, 1999.

______. Biopolítica, mídia e autoajuda: segredo ou sintoma?Revista Galáxia, PUC-SP, 2010.

How to Cite

Tucherman, I. (2012). Dangerous relations: self-help, media and biopower. Revista FAMECOS, 19(2), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2012.2.12316

Issue

Section

Media and Culture