Social indexicality and L2 speech development
Underexplored dynamic routes in psycholinguistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.1.44429Keywords:
L2 speech, Psycholinguistics, Social indexicalityAbstract
The propensity to see language as a construction that provides social cues has great implications for both societal structure and human psychological processes, including first and second language development and attrition. In this regard, social indexicality, for instance, has been shown to play a crucial role in L2 speech development. Even though some branches of linguistics embrace social indexicality in their machinery and predictions (e.g., sociolinguistics, sociophonetics), the addition of social variables in the area of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) and in Psycholinguistics might be seen as recent and limited. Considering that psycholinguistics should start including social indexicality when addressing language learning, this theoretical research article aims at exploring and drawing attention to the relationship between psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics with regard to L2 speech development. In order to do so, it provides an outline of the research agenda of L2 speech development as situated in psycholinguistics. It then discusses the role of social indexicality in bilingual development. Finally, the article advocates the Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST) as a fruitful paradigm to anchor such an interface, since it includes both cognitive and social aspects in its core.
Downloads
References
ADAMI, Christoph. What is complexity? Bioessays, Medford, v. 24, n. 12, p. 1085-1094, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10192
ALBANO, Eleonora C. O gesto audível: fonologia como pragmática. São Paulo: Cortez, 2020.
ALBANO, Eleonora C. O gesto e suas bordas: esboço de fonologia acústico-articulatória do português brasileiro. Campinas: ALB; Mercado de Letras, 2001.
AMBADY, Nalini; SKOWRONSKI, John. First impressions. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.
ASHBY, Michael; MAIDMENT, John. Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808852
BECKNER, Clay et al. Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Language Learning, Flagstaff, v. 59, p. 1-26, dez. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x
BEST, Catherine. A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In: STRANGE, Winifred (org.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research. Timonium: York Press, 1995. p. 171-204.
BEST, Catherine; TYLER, Michael. Nonnative and second-language speech perception: commonalities and complementarities. In: BOHN, Ocke-Schwen; MUNRO, Murray (org.). Language learning & language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. v. 17. p. 13-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
BLOCK, David. The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
BULCHOLTS, Mary. From stance to style: gender interaction and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In: JAFFE, Alexandra (ed.). Stance: sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 146-170.
BYBEE, Joan. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886
CHEN, Kan; BAK, Per. Self-organized criticality. Scientific American, New York, v. 264, n. 1, p. 26-33, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0191-46
CILLIERS, Paul. Complexity and postmodernism. London: Routledge, 1998.
COLANTONI, Laura; STEELE, Jeffrey; ESCUDERO, Paola. Second language speech: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139087636
DARVIN, Ron; NORTON, Bonny. Identity. In: LI, Shaofeng; HIVER, Phil; PAPI, Mostafa (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Individual Differences. New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 235-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-20
DILLEY, Laura; MATTYS, Sven; VINKE, Louis. Potent prosody: comparing the effects of distal prosody, proximal prosody, and semantic context on word segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, Amsterdam, v. 63, n. 3, p. 274-294, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.003
DRAGER, Katie. Linguistic variation, identity construction and cognition. Berlim: Language Science Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603352
DRUMMOND, Rob. Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of Polish migrants living in Manchester, UK. Language Variation and Change, Cambridge, v. 24, n. 1, p. 107-133, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000026
DUFOUR, Sophie et al. The perception of the French /s/-/ʃ/ contrast in early Creole-French bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, Lausanne, v. 22, n. 5, p. 1-8, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01200
ECKERT, Penelope; RICKFORD, John. Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613258
ECKERT, Penelope. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, Hoboken, v. 12, n. 1, p. 453-476, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x
ERIKSEN, Thomas. What is anthropology? London: Pluto Press, 2004.
ESCUDERO, Paola; BOERSMA, Paul. Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phono-logical theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge, v. 26, n. 4, p. 551-585, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104040021
ESCUDERO, Paola. Linguistic perception and second language acquisition. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2005.
ESCUDERO, Paola. Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. In: BOERSMA, Paul; HAMMAN, Silke (org.). Phonology in perception. Berlim: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. p. 151-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219234.151
EVANS, Bronwen G.; IVERSON, Paul. Plasticity in vowel perception and production: a study of accent change in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Melville, v. 121, n. 1, p. 3814-3826, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209
EVANS, Bronwen G.; IVERSON, Paul. Vowel normali¬zation for accent: an investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sen¬tences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Melville, v. 115, n. 1, p. 352-361, jan. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1635413
FERRARO, Gary; ANDREATTA, Susan. Cultural anthro¬pology: an applied perspective. Belmont: Cengage Learning, 2010.
FIGUEIREDO, Eduardo. Second language acquisition in Brazil since the social turn. Revista Brasileira de Linguís-tica Aplicada, Belo Horizonte, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1-27, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6398201812420
FLEGE, James Emil; BOHN, Ocke-Schwen. The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). In: WAYLAND, Ratree (org.). Second language speech learning: theoretical and empirical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. p. 3-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.003
FLEGE, James Emil. Second language speech learning: theory, findings and problems. In: STRANGE, Winifred (org.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: is¬sues in cross-language research. Baltimore: York Press, 1995. p. 233-277.
FOULKES, Paul; DOCHERTY, Gerard. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, Ams-terdam, v. 34, p. 409-438, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002
FOULKES, Paul; DOCHERTY, Gerard. Urban voices: accent studies in the British Isles. London: Hodder Education, 1999.
GEE, James. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press, 1990.
GUMPERZ, John. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
GILEAD, Michael; LIBERMAN, Nira. Talker variability and perceived identity: investigating the cognitive processes underlying person perception. Journal of Memory and Language, Amsterdam, v. 101, p. 42-60, 2018.
HENRICH, Joseph; HEINE, Steven J.; NORENZAYAN, Ara. Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, London, v. 466, n. 7302, p. 29-29, jul. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
HOLLAND, John. Hidden order: how adaption builds complexity. New York: Perseus Books, 1995.
HOLLAND, John. Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, [s. l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z
HOWARD, Martin. Style and (in)formality: Developing socio-stylistic variation in a second language. In: GEES¬LIN, Kimberly (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 152-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017325-14
JACKSON, Carrie; O’BRIEN, Mary. The interaction betwe¬en prosody and meaning in second language speech production. Unterrichtspraxis, [s. l.], v. 44, n. 1, p. 1-11, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1221.2011.00087.x
JIQUILIN-RAMIREZ, Diego et al. Três casos de deriva fonética intralinguística na aquisição fonológica de adultos. In: FERREIRA-GONÇALVES, Giovana; BRUM¬-DE-PAULA, Mirian (org.). Dinâmica dos movimentos articulatórios: sons, gestos, imagens. Pelotas: UFPel, 2013. p. 11-36.
KAUFFMAN, Stuart. At home in the universe: the search for laws of complexity. London: Viking Press, 1995.
KENT, Ray; READ, Charles. The acoustic analysis of speech. London: Cengage Learning, 1992.
KIM, Su; WEBB, Stuart. Individual difference factors for second language vocabulary. In: LI, Shaofeng; HIVER, Phil; PAPI, Mostafa (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Individual Differences. New York: Routledge, 2022. p. 282-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546-24
KINZLER, Katherine D. Language as a Social Cue. Annual Review of Psychology, San Mateo, v. 72, n. 1, p. 241-264, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103034
KOTTAK, Conrad. Anthropology: appreciating human diversity. New York: McGraw Hill, 2011.
KUNDA, Ziva. Social cognition: making sense of people. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6291.001.0001
KUPSKE, Felipe F. Imigração, Atrito e Complexidade: A Produção das Oclusivas Surdas Iniciais do Inglês e do Português por Sul-Brasileiros Residentes em Londres. Tese (Doutorado em Letras)– Programa de Pós-Gra-duação em Letras, Instituto de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2016.
KUPSKE, Felipe F. A complex approach on integrated late bilinguals’ English VOT production: a study on South Brazilian immigrants in London. Ilha do Desterro, Florianópolis, v. 70, n. 3, p. 81-93, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p81
KUPSKE, Felipe F. Atrito linguístico. In: KUPSKE, Felipe F.; ALVES, Ubiratã K.; LIMA JR., Ronaldo (org.). Investi-gando os sons de línguas não nativas: uma introdução. Campinas: Abralin, 2021a. v. 1. p. 99-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25189/9788568990117
KUPSKE, Felipe F. Destabilizing effects of L2 explicit pronunciation instruction on L1 speech: voice onset time production by Brazilian intermediate users of English. Gradus: Revista Brasileira de Fonologia de Laboratório, Porto Alegre, v. 6, n. 2, p. 32-49, 2021b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47627/gradus.v6i2.174
KUPSKE, Felipe F.; LIMA JR., Ronaldo. Integração a contextos de L2 dominantes e adaptabilidade fono¬lógica de L1: uma análise da produção das plosivas surdas do português brasileiro. Organon, São Paulo, v. 37, p. 173-198, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.122646
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Letrônica
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.