La fricción de la mediación. Para una crítica de las relaciones-mundo tecnológicamente mediadas.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.48820Palabras clave:
Filosofía de la tecnología, Teoría Crítica, Hartmut Rosa, Mediación tecnológica, Relaciones-mundoResumen
Aunque los estudios contemporáneos y la filosofía de la tecnología han esclarecido la tecnicidad constitutiva de lo humano, a menudo dejan de lado cuestiones relacionadas con la formación social moderna y la alienación. Por otro lado, los diagnósticos teórico-críticos de la modernidad tienden a tratar la tecnología principalmente como razón instrumental. Este ensayo explora programáticamente la tensión entre el enfoque relacional que la posfenomenología adopta respecto de la mediación tecnológica y la crítica de la modernidad de Hartmut Rosa. Al introducir el concepto de fricción como discontinuidad constitutiva en las relaciones con el mundo mediadas técnicamente, el ensayo sostiene que la dinámica escalatoria de la modernidad reduce las fricciones a obstáculos que deben superarse. Al poner de relieve la fricción de la mediación, el ensayo esboza una crítica de las relaciones con el mundo mediadas tecnológicamente orientada a la rehabilitación del potencial vinculante y transformador de la fricción.
Descargas
Citas
Achterhuis, Hans, ed. 2001. American philosophy of technology: the empirical turn. Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Technology. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/1092.0
Åkerman, Nordal. 1993. A free-falling society? Six introductory notes. In The necessity of friction. Nineteen essays on a vital force, edited by Nordal Åkerman. Physica-Verlag. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95905-9_2
Anders, Günther. 2018. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen 1: über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution. C. H. Beck.
Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the character of contemporary life: a philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Delanty, Gerard, and Neal Harris. 2021. Critical theory and the question of technology: the Frankfurt School revisited. Thesis Eleven 166 (1): 88-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136211002055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136211002055
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Mark Wrathall, M. 2014. Skillful coping. Essays on the phenomenology of everyday perception and action. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654703.001.0001
Feenberg, Andrew. 2002. Transforming technology: a critical theory revisited. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195146158.001.0001
Habermas, Jürgen. 1997. Modernity: an unfinished project. In Habermas and the unfinished project of modernity: critical essays on the philosophical discourse of modernity, edited by Maurizio Passerin d’Entrèves and Seyla Benhabib. The MIT Press.
Haraway, Donna. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Harris, Robert. 2010. Imperium (Cicero I). Cornerstone Digital. Kindle.
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Harper and Row.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. Harper and Row.
Heßler, Martina. 2025. Sisyphos im Maschinenraum: eine Geschichte der Fehlbarkeit von Mensch und Technologie. C. H. Beck. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406823312
Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/3108.0
Kemper, Jakko. 2024. Frictionlessness: the silicon valley philosophy of seamless technology and the aesthetic value of imperfection. Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798765104439
Langewiesche, William. 2010. Fly by wire: the geese, the glide, the ‘miracle’ on the Hudson. Penguin Books.
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
Lemmens, Pieter. 2022. Thinking technology big again. Reconsidering the question of the transcendental and ‘Technology with a Capital T’ in the light of the anthropocene. Foundations of Science 27: 171-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09732-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-020-09732-7
Marx, Leo. 1997. Technology: the emergence of a hazardous concept. Social Research 64 (3): 965-988. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40971194.
Noble, David F. 1999. The religion of technology: the divinity of man and the spirit of invention. Penguin Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.1998v23n4a1072
Mauss, Marcel. 1973. Techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2 (1): 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003
Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
Roose, Kevin. 2018. Is tech too easy to use? The New York Times, Dec. 12, 2018, Technology. https://tinyurl.com/2ek3t7v4.
Rosa, Hartmut. 2010. Alienation and acceleration: towards a critical theory of late-modern Temporality. NSU Press.
Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity. Translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834
Rosa, Hartmut. 2015. Escalation: the crisis of dynamic stabilisation and the prospect of resonance. In Sociology, capitalism, critique, edited by Klaus Dörre, Stephan Lessenich, and Hartmut Rosa. Verso.
Rosa, Hartmut. 2017. Dynamic stabilization, the triple A approach to the good life, and the resonance conception. Questions de Communication 31: 437-456. https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.11228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.11228
Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonance: a sociology of our relationship to the world. Polity Press.
Rosa, Hartmut. 2020. The uncontrollability of the world. Polity Press.
Rosenberger, Robert, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2015. A field guide to postphenomenology. In Postphenomenological investigations: essays on human-technology relations, edited by Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek. Lexington Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978726208
Secomandi, Fernando. 2015. Bodies as technology: how can postphenomenologists deal with the matter of human technique? In Postphenomenological investigations: essays on human-technology relations, edited by Robert Rosenberger and Peter-Paul Verbeek. Lexington Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781978726208.ch-006
Sennett, Richard. 2008. The craftsman. Penguin Books.
Snyder, Jason. 2025. Friction is the point: what ai will never understand about being human. Forbes, Jun. 15, 2025, CMO Network. https://tinyurl.com/jcpa6en7.
Stiegler, Bernard. 1998. Technics and time, 1: the fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616738
Vallor, Shannon. 2022. Introducing the philosophy of technology. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of technology, edited by Shannon Vallor. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.1
Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2022. The empirical turn. In The Oxford handbook of philosophy of technology, edited by Shannon Vallor. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.4
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 João Tziminadis
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
