Prolegômenos para uma genealogia das relações-mundo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.48808Palavras-chave:
Ressonância, Alienação, Aceleração, Genealogia, Relações-mundoResumo
Este ensaio argumenta que o duplo diagnóstico de modernidade de Hartmut Rosa, que compreende as forças alienantes da aceleração social e o potencial emancipatório da ressonância, serve como um prolegômeno para uma genealogia das relações-mundo. Embora Rosa defenda uma abordagem genealógica, ele não a desenvolve plenamente. O ensaio traça como suas principais obras estabelecem as bases conceituais para uma crítica emancipatória de natureza genealógica. Baseando-se na dimensão estilística da genealogia de Martin Saar e na noção de história efetiva de Michel Foucault, é apresentado o esboço dos passos iniciais para a concretização de uma genealogia das relações-mundo. O resultado provisório visa expandir o escopo da obra de Rosa para fundamentar a análise de diversas dinâmicas sociais e uma síntese de seus conceitos centrais em uma prática crítica.
Downloads
Referências
Allen, Amy. 2008. The politics of ourselves: power, autonomy, and gender in contemporary critical theory. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/alle13622
Allen, Amy. 2016. The end of progress: decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/alle17324
Dean, Mitchell. 1994. Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and Historical Sociology. Routledge.
Epstein, Brian. 2010. History and the critique of social concepts. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40(1): 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350678
Evans, Fred. 2001. Genealogy and the problem of affirmation in Nietzsche, Foucault and Bakhtin. Philosophy & Social Criticism 27(3): 41-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019145370102700303
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In Language, counter-memory, practice: selected essays and interviews, edited by Donald F. Bouchard. Cornell University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 2001. Power. Translated by James D. Faubion. New Press.
Geuss, Raymond. 2002. Genealogy as critique. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00157
Hanemaayer, Ariane. 2018. Genealogy as a counter‐human science. Canadian Review of Sociology 55(2): 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12197
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Blackwell Publishers.
Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The question concerning technology and other essays. Translated by William Lovitt. Garland Publishing, Inc.
Heidegger, Martin. 1982. The basic problems of phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 1985. History of the concept of time: prolegomena. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Indiana University Press.
Jaeggi, Rahel. 2014. Alienation. Columbia University Press.
Koopman, Colin. 2013. Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/6546.0
May, Todd. 2014. Genealogy, problematization, and normativity in Michel Foucault. History and Theory 53(3): 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.10721
Rosa, Hartmut. 2012. ‘Weiße’ und ‘schwarze’ genealogie: affirmative und pejorative Wertgeschichten bei Taylor und Foucault. In Perspektiven der Aufklärung: zwischen Mythos und Realität, edited by Michael Hofmann and Katja Stopka. Meidenbauer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846752043_003
Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity. Translated by Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834
Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonance: a sociology of our relationship to the world. Translated by James C. Wagner. Polity Press.
Rosa, Hartmut. 2023. Resonance as a medio-passive, emancipatory and transformative power: a reply to my critics. The Journal of Chinese Sociology 10(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00195-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00195-4
Saar, Martin. 2002. Genealogy and subjectivity. European Journal of Philosophy 10(2): 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00159
Saar, Martin. 2007. Genealogie als Kritik: Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Campus Verlag.
Saar, Martin. 2008. Understanding genealogy: history, power, and the Self. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2(3): 295-314. https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187226308X335976
Santos, James William. 2025. Foucault’s genealogical normative stance. Thesis Eleven. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251335664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136251335664
Santos, James William, and Emil Albert Sobottka. 2023. Genealogy, immanent critique and forms of life: a path for decolonial studies. Human Affairs 33(1): 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2022-2034
Sartori, Andrew. 2020. Genealogy, critical theory, history. Critical Historical Studies 7(1): 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1086/707986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/707986
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 James William Santos
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
