Petrobras’ Energy Transition Discourse

Nation, Science, and Community in 'A Brazil of Energy'

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2026.1.48503

Keywords:

climate delay, climate rhetoric, corporate environmental communication, discourse analysis, Equatorial Margin

Abstract

This article contributes to research on fossil fuel companies’ communication strategies through an analysis of Petrobras's energy transition discourse. It focuses on the documentary series A Brazil of Energy and examines how meanings of the energy transition are constructed, negotiated, and contested through symbolic and discursive elements in text and image. The analysis reveals a “micropolitics of language,” as Petrobras legitimizes its expansion into the Equatorial Margin by portraying the transition as a project of community empowerment, scientific innovation, and reaffirmation of its historical role as Brazil’s flagship company. Metonymic strategies tie Petrobras to Brazil’s nature, geography, and relatively clean energy mix, while also invoking national pride in technological achievements. Although the company echoes global oil majors in its emphasis on development and “technological salvationism,” it stands apart through a pronounced appeal to Brazilianness. This framing positions Petrobras as a national actor advancing a localized form of climate delay discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luiz Enrique Vieira de Souza, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.

Luiz Enrique Vieira de Souza holds a degree in Social Sciences and a PhD in Sociology from the University of São Paulo. He was a DAAD scholarship holder at the Technische Universität Berlin, where he investigated topics related to classical social theory and the history of Germany. Between 2013 and 2017, he conducted postdoctoral research in environmental sociology at the University of Campinas (NEPAM) and worked as a visiting researcher at Beijing Jiaotong University, publishing works on Chinese government energy policies (2015). Currently, he conducts research in Environmental Sociology and Energy Transition at Federal University of Sergipe.

References

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DO PETRÓLEO, GÁS NATURAL E BIOCOMBUSTÍVEIS (ANP). Relatório anual de segurança operacional. Rio de Janeiro: ANP, 2023b.

ASMELASH, E.; GORINI, R. International oil companies and the energy transition. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2021. Disponível em: https://realc.olade.org/documento.php?doc=312496. Acesso em: 24 out. 2024.

BOSCO, E.; FETZ, M.; SOUZA, L. E. V. Climate change denialism: science and power struggle in the public sphere. In: SHEFNER, J. et al. (org.). Palgrave handbook of global social change. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. p. 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87624-1_332-1

BRULLE, R. J.; ARONCZYK, M.; CARMICHAEL, J. Corporate promotion and climate change: an analysis of key variables affecting advertising spending by major oil corporations, 1986-2015. Climatic Change, [s. l.], v. 159, p. 87-101, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02582-8. Acesso em: 18 ago. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02582-8

COUTO, F. IBAMA upholds denial for Petrobras drilling in the Amazon basin. Valor International, 30 out. 2024. Disponível em: https://valorinternational.globo.com/business/news/2024/10/30/ibama-upholds-denial-for-petrobras-drilling-in-amazon-basin.ghtml. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2024.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman, 1995.

FOUCAULT, M. The order of discourse. In: YOUNG, R. (org.). Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader. Boston: Routledge, 1981. p. 48-78.

GORAYEB, A. et al. Wind power gone bad: critiquing wind power planning processes in Northeastern Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, [s. l.], v. 40, p. 82-88, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.027. Acesso em: 7 jul. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.027

GRASSI, V.; BROERING, G. Challenge of the energy transition in Brazil: Petrobras’ role in climate change and the implementation of the 2024-2028 strategic plan. Beijing Law Review, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 4, p. 2189-2201, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2024.154122. Acesso em: 8 nov. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2024.154122

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS RENOVÁVEIS (IBAMA). Parecer Técnico n. 128/2023-Coexp/CGMac/Dilic. Empreendimento: Atividade de Perfuração Marítima no Bloco FZA-M-59, Bacia do Foz do Amazonas. Rio de Janeiro: IBAMA, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/ibama/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2023/ibama-nega-licenca-de-perfuracao-na-bacia-da-foz-do-amazonas/parecer-coexp-fza-59.pdf. Acesso em: 24 out. 2025.

INSTITUTO HUMANITAS UNISINOS (IHU). Exploração de petróleo na Margem Equatorial anularia ganhos climáticos de zerar o desmatamento na Amazônia. São Leopoldo, 5 dez. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.ihu.unisinos.br/categorias/634891-exploracao-de-petroleo-na-margem-equatorial-anularia-ganhos-climaticos-de-zerar-o-desmatamento-na-amazonia. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2024.

KELMAN, R. et al. Can Brazil become a green hydrogen powerhouse? Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, [s. l.], v. 8, n. 11, p. 21-32, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2020.811003. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2020.811003

LAMB, W. F. et al. Discourses on climate delay. Global Sustainability, [s. l.], v. 3, e17, p. 1-5, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13. Acesso em: 27 fev. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13

LI, M.; TRENCHER, G.; ASUKA, J. The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: a mismatch between discourse, actions and investments. PLoS ONE, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 1-27, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263596. Acesso em: 10 out. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263596

MEGURA, M.; GUNDERSON, R. Better poison is the cure? Critically examining fossil fuel companies, climate change framing, and corporate sustainability reports. Energy Research & Social Science, [s. l.], v. 85, p. 1-10, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102388. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102388

ORESKES, N.; CONWAY, E. M. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. New York: Bloomsbury, 2011.

OTTO, D.; GROSS, M. Stuck on coal and persuasion? A critical review of carbon capture and storage communication. Energy Research & Social Science, [s. l.], v. 82, p. 1-13, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102306. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102306

PETROBRAS. 2023 Sustainability report: Message from the CEO. 2023a. Disponível em: https://sustentabilidade.petrobras.com.br/w/mensagem-da-presidente-1. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2025.

PETROBRAS. 2024_2028+ Strategic Plan: New movements. 2024a. Disponível em: https://petrobras.com.br/en/quem-somos/estrategia. Acesso em: 18 fev. 2025.

PETROBRAS. Biorrefino e Diesel R: Soluções para a Transição Energética | Um Brasil de Energia. YouTube. 1 vídeo [21m52s]. Canal Petrobras, 30 jan. 2024d. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8BScOZcCZk&t. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Carbono Azul: como o mangue ajuda o planeta | Um Brasil de Energia. YouTube. 1 vídeo [19m31s]. Canal Petrobras, 1 mar. 2024e. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QA3aZSxjTEQ&t. Acesso em: 12 jul. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Climate change supplement. 2024b. Disponível em: https://petrobras.com.br/en/sustentabilidade/mudancas-climaticas#caderno-do-clima. Acesso em: 18 set. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Descarbonização no Brasil: O Caminho para uma Nova Era de Energia | Um Brasil de Energia. YouTube. 1 vídeo [21m57s]. Canal Petrobras, 12 jan. 2024c. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DmD4FeSP74&t. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Energias limpas e o futuro sustentável | Um Brasil de Energia. YouTube. 1 vídeo [21m06s]. Canal Petrobras, 18 abr. 2024i. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9_VIZi83ss&t. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Equatorial Margin: a new offshore frontier. 2024f. Disponível em: https://petrobras.com.br/quem-somos/novas-fronteiras. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Estatuto social da Petrobras. 2023c. Disponível em: https://sindipetro.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Estatuto-Social-da-Petrobras_AGE-30-11-2023.pdf. Acesso em: 15 mai. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Qual é o papel das fontes renováveis na transição energética?| Um Brasil de Energia. YouTube. 1 vídeo [21m45s]. Canal Petrobras, 20 mar. 2024h. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jA7XRHQVg_U&t. Acesso em: 28 jul. 2024.

PETROBRAS. Petrobras: Taking part in biodiversity conservation. 2024g. Disponível em: https://issuu.com/estantepetrobras/docs/caderno_de_biodiversidade_petrobras. Acesso em: 3 set. 2024.

PETROBRAS. O Papel da Energia Eólica na Transição Energética Justa do Brasil | Um Brasil de Energia. YouTube. 1 vídeo [14m20s]. Canal Petrobras, 21 dez. 2023b. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TllZOlCIxus&t. Acesso em: 29 jul. 2024.

SANTOS, M. J. T.; CRUZ, K. G. S.; MATOS, V. S.; FERREIRA, R. M. C. Publicidade suspensa pelo CONAR: “Petrobras – Estar no meio ambiente sem ser notada”. In: CONGRESSO DE CIÊNCIAS DA COMUNICAÇÃO NA REGIÃO NORDESTE, 14., 2012, Recife. Anais [...]. Recife: INTERCOM, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.intercom.org.br/papers/regionais/nordeste2012/resumos/R32-0780-1.pdf. Acesso em: 22 out. 2025.

SILVA, M. V.; BALDISSERA, R. Brazilianness, heroism, utility, and necessity: the built by an ethos by Petrobras’ institutional advertisement. Organicom, Porto Alegre, v. 14, n. 27, p. 134-146, 2017. Disponível em: https://lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/188586/001086410.pdf?sequence=1. Acesso em: 22 out. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-2593.organicom.2017.144115

SI, Y.; DESAI, D.; BOZHILOVA, D.; PUFFER, S.; STEPHENS, J. C. Fossil fuel companies’ climate strategies: industry messaging on renewables and natural gas. Energy Research & Social Science, [s. l.], v. 98, p. 1-9, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103028. Acesso em: 3 mar. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103028

STATISTA. Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions of largest oil companies in 2023. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1267242/greenhouse-gas-emissions-of-select-oil-companies/. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2024.

STENGERS, I. In catastrophic times: resisting the coming barbarism. London: Humanities Press, 2015.

SUPRAN, G.; ORESKES, N. Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications. One Earth, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 5, p. 696-719, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014. Acesso em: 25 mai. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014

TILSTED, J. P.; MAH, A.; NIELSEN, T. D.; FINKILL, G.; BAUER, F. Petrochemical transition narratives: selling fossil fuel solutions in a decarbonizing world. Energy Research & Social Science, [s. l.], v. 94, p. 1-13, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102880. Acesso em: 6 out. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102880

VAN UFFELEN, N.; TAEBI, B.; PESCH, U. Revisiting the energy justice framework: doing justice to normative uncertainties. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, [s. l.], v. 189, p. 1-8, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113974. Acesso em: 17 dez. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113974

Published

2026-01-08

How to Cite

Souza, L. E. V. de. (2026). Petrobras’ Energy Transition Discourse: Nation, Science, and Community in ’A Brazil of Energy’. Revista FAMECOS, 33(1), e48503. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2026.1.48503

Issue

Section

Organizational communication