Nietzsche's critique of mass culture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2000.13.3078Keywords:
Communication, Nietzsche, Mass cultureAbstract
Reasoning about Nietzsche’s contribution to the mass culture debate, this article aims to underscore his internal contraditons from both an historical and from a cultural point of view, in order to situate the philosopher’s ideas about that subject vis-a-vis the advances of cultural modernity. The author adopts both a critical and a dialectical perspective in his reading of Nietzsche.Downloads
References
GOLDER, Herbert Introduction in Unmodern Observations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990
HAYMAN, Ronald Nietzsche: A Critical Life. New York: Penguin Books, 1980
HORKHEIMER, Max e ADORNO, Theodor Dialética do Esclarecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 1985
LYOTARD, Jean-François Economie libidinale. Paris: Minuit, 1974
MARX, Karl Liberdade de Imprensa. Porto Alegre: L&PM, 1999
NIETZSCHE, Friedrich A Gaia Ciência § 108. São Paulo: Hemus, 1981
______, Friedrich Assim falou Zaratustra Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1981
______, Friedrich Considerações Intempestivas. Lisboa, Presença, 1976
______, Friedrich Crepúsculo dos ídolos. São Paulo: Hemus, 1976
______, Friedrich O nascimento da tragédia. São Paulo: Cia. das Letras, 1992
STRAUSS, David Crente e escritor in Unmodern Observations. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Famecos implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Famecos as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.