Public relations and micropolitics: a comparative study of their processes and programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.1997.7.2990Keywords:
Communication, public relations, organizationsAbstract
This article contains a comparative study between the processes and programs of Public Relations and micropolitics, deepening the theory of the management of the political organizational function to explain the activity of Public Relations. It discusses the political design and power relationship. It reduces the angle of macropolitics to micropolitics. Integrates the concepts of micropolitics existing in the areas of education and political science. Explain that organization is, par excellence, a political arena. It carries out the comparative study demonstrating the coincidence between the processes and programs of micropolitics and Public Relations. Finally, it focuses on communication as an instrument of the exercise of power, being this the essence and the communication, the appearance.Downloads
References
BACHARACH, Peter & LAWLER, E. Power and Politics in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
BALL, Stephen. The Micropolitics of the School: Toward a theory of school organization. London: Metheun, 1990.
BALL, Stephen. & BOWE, R. “Micropolitics of Radical Change: Budgets, Management, and Control in British Schools”. In: BLASE, J. (Ed), The Politics of Life in Schools. London: Sage, (19-45), 1991.
BARRY, N. An Introduction to Modern Political Theory. London: MacMillan, 1981.
BERLO, David K. Teoria da Comunicação. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura, 1970.
BLASE, J. “The Micropolitical Perspective”. In BLASE, J. (Ed). The Political of Life in Schools: Power, Conflict and Cooperation, London: Sage, (1-18), 1991.
BLECHER, Marc J. & WHITE, Gordon. Micropolitics in contemporary Chine: a technical unit during and after the cultural revolution. White Plans, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 1979.
BLOOME, D. & WILLETT, J. “Towards a Micropolitics of Classroom Interaction”. In: BLASE, J. The Political of Life in Schools. (207-236), 1991.
BLUMER, Herbert. Symbolic Interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
BLUMER, H. “Sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead”. In: COLIN, B.R. et al. (eds) School and Society. London: Open University, 1971.
BOBBIO, Norberto, MATTEUCI, Nicola e PASQUINO, Gianfranco. Dicionário de Política. Brasília, Universidade de Brasília, 1986.
BURBULES, Nicholas C. “A Theory of Power in Educacion”. Education Theory, Spring, 36 (2), 95-114. 1986.
BURLINGAME, M. “Review of the micropolitics of the school: Toward a theory of school organization”. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 281-283, 1988
BURNS, T. “Micropolitics: Mechanisms of Institutional Change”. Administration Science Quarterly, 6, 267-281, 1961.
CANFIELD, Bertrand R. Relações Públicas: Princípios, casos e problemas. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1961.
CARTWRIGHT, D. Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, 1959.
CRICK, Bernard & CRICK, Tom. What is Politics ? London: Edward Arnold, 1987.
CORBETT, H. D. “Community Influence and School Micropolitics: A Case Example”. In: BLASE, J. (Ed). The Politics of Life in Schools, London: Sage, (73-95), 1991.
CORSETTI, Eduardo. “Poder e poder político”. In: PETERSEN, Aurea et al. Ciência Política: textos introdutórios. Porto Alegre: Mundo Jovem, 1988.
CYERT, R.M.,& MARCH, J. G. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
DANCE, F.E.X. ”The Concept of Communication”. In: Journal of Communication. Vol 20, 201-210, 1970.
ETZIONI, Amitai. Organizações Modernas. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1978.
EVERHART, R. B. “Unraveling micropolitical mystiques: Some Methodological Opportunities”. Education and Urban Society, 23 (4), 455-464, 1991.
FESTINGER, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.
FOUCAULT, Michel. Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1971.
__________. Power and Knowledge. New York: Pantheon, 1980.
FRENCH, J. & RAVEN, B. “The Bases of Social Power”. In D. Cartwright (Ed) Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, 1959.
GALBRAITH, John. Anatomia do poder. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1984.
GEORGIOU, Petro. “Goal Paradigm and Notes Towards a Counter Paradigm”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 291-310, 1973.
GREENFIELD, Jr. W. D. “The Micropolitics of Leadership in an Urban Elementary School”. In: BLASE, J. The Political of Life in Schools, London: Sage, (161-184), 1991.
GREENSTEIN, Fred I. & POLSBY, Nelson W. Micropolitical Theory. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
HABERMAS, Jüergen. Teoria de la acción comunicativa. Barcelona: Taurus, 1987.
HARVEY, E. & MILLS, R. “Patterns of Organization Adaptation: A Political Perspective”. In: Mayer, Zald (ed) Power in Organizations. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press, 181-213, 1970.
HOYLE, E. “Micropolitics of Educational Organization”. Educational Management and Administration, 10, 87-98, 1982.
__________. “Educational organizations: Micropolitics”. In HUSEN, T. & POSTLETHWAITE, T. N. (Eds). The International Encyclopedia of Education Research and Studies, 36 (2), 95-114, 1985.
IANNACCONE, L. Education policy systems: A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova University, 1975.
__________. “Micropolitis of Education: What and Why”. Education and Urban Society, Vol. 23, nº 4, August, 465-471, 1991.
KATZ, Daniel e KAHN, Robert. Psicologia social das organizações. São Paulo: Atlas, 1979.
KAUFMAN, H. “Organization Theory and Political Theory”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 58, nº 1, 5-14, 1964.
KESSEL, J. H. Micropolitics, Individual and Group Level Concepts. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.
KRECH, D.; CRUCHFIELD, R. e BALLACHEY, E. O indivíduo na sociedade. São Paulo: Pioneira, 1969.
LAWRENCE, Paul R. & LORSCH, Jay W. Organization and Enviroment. Boston: Harvard Press, 1967.
LAZEGA, E. The micropolitics of knowledge: communication and indirect control in work groups. New York: A. de Gruyter, 1992.
LEONI, Leoni. “The meaning of ‘Political‘, in Political Decisions”. Political Studies, 5, 239 -245, 1957.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Legitimação pelo procedimento. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 1980.
LUKES, Steven. El poder: un enfoque radical. México: Siglo Veintiuno, 1985.
__________. (Ed). Power. Oxford: Basil Blackweel, 1986.
MARCH, J. G., “The Business Firm as a Political Coalition”, Journal of Politics, Vol. 24, 662-678, 1962.
MARCH, James G. e SIMON, Herbert A. Teoria das organizações. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 1972.
MARSHALL, C. “The Chasm Between Administrator and Teacher Cultures: A Micropolitical Puzzle”. In: BLASE, J. The Politics of Life in Schools, (139-160), 1991.
MARSHALL, C. & SCRIBNER, J. D. “’It’s all political’: Inquiry Into the Micropolitics of Education”. Education and Urban Society, 23 (4), 347-355. 1991.
MATURANA, Humberto & VARELA, Francisco. El árbol del conocimiento. Santiago: Universitária, 1984
McCORNEY, J. The Real World of Ideology. Sussex: Harvester, 1980.
MERRIAM, Charles E. Political Power. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press, 1950.
MILLER, Gerald H. “On defining communication: another stab”, Journal of Communication, vol.16, 88-98, 1966.
MINTZBERG, Henry. El poder en la organización. Barcelona: Ariel Economia, 1992.
OAKESHOTT, Michael. Political Education. Cambridge: Cambridge Academic Press, 1951.
PARSONS, Talcott. Structure and process in modern societies New York: The Free Press, 1969.
PATCHEN, M. “The Locus and Basis of Influence on Organizational Decisions”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 11, 195-221, 1974.
PETERSEN, Aurea. Ciência Política: textos introdutórios. Porto Alegre: Mundo Jovem, 1988.
PETTIGREW, A. M. The Politics of Organizational Decision Making. London: Tavistock, 1973.
PFEFFER, J. “The micropolitics of organizations”. In: MEYER, M.W. et al. (Eds) Enviromments and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973.
PFEFFER, J. & SALANCIK, G.R. “Organizational Decision Making as a Political Process: The Case of a University Budget”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 19, nº 2, 135-151, 1974.
__________. Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1981.
PIRIE, Madsen. Micropolitics: The Creation of Successful Policy. Andershot, Hants: Wildwood House, 1988.
RAVEN, Bertram. “Social Influence and Power”. In: Steiner, D. & Fishbein, M. (Eds) Current Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1975.
__________. “Interpersonal Influence and Social Power”. In: Raven, Bertram. & Rubin, Jeffrey. (Eds). Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley, 1983.
SCHACTER, S. “Deviation, rejection, and communication”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol. 16, 190-207, 1951.
SEMAMA, Paolo. Linguagem e Poder. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 1981.
SILVERMAN, D. The Theory of Organizations. London: Heinemann, 1970.
SIMÕES, Roberto P. Relações Públicas: Função política. São Paulo: Summus, 1993.
SORAUF, Francis J. Iniciação ao estudo da ciência política. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1967.
SUSSKIND, Lawrence & FIELD, Patrick. Em crise com a opinião pública. São Paulo: Futura, 1997.
THERBORN, G. The Ideology of Power and the Power of Ideology. London: Verso, 1988.
TRINDADE, Helgio. “As ciências políticas nas Relações Públicas”. In Anais do 1º Ciclo de Integração de Relações Públicas. Porto Alegre: PUCRS, 1974.
VARELA, J. Psychological Solutions to Social Problems. New York: Academic Press, 1986.
WAMSLEY, G. L.,& ZALD, M.N. The Political Economy of Public Organizations. Lexington, Mass.: Heath Co, 1973.
WEBER, Max. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press, 1947.
___________. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
WILLOWER, Donald. “Micropolitics and Sociology of School Organizations”. Education and Urban Society, Vol. 23 , Nº 4, August, 442-454, 1991.
WRONG, Dennis. Power: Its Forms, Bases and Uses. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1979.
ZALEZNIK, A. “Power and Politics in Organizational Life”, Harward Business Review, Vol. 48, nº 3, 47-60, 1970.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Famecos implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Famecos as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.