O papel da perigrafia na comunicação visual ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2022.1.43260Palavras-chave:
Análise Visual, Comunicação Ambiental, América do Sul, ONG, PerigrafiaResumo
Este artigo busca analisar os elementos visuais desenhados para orientar a interpretação do significado das fotografias publicadas nas redes sociais por grupos ambientalistas na América do Sul, identificando que possibilidades e significados podem proporcionar no processo de comunicação. Por isso, analisa e compara as imagens publicadas por três filiais sul-americanas da Wildlife Conservation Society no Instagram: Argentina, Chile e Colômbia, considerando o papel complementar desse tipo de elemento na fotografia e seu impacto em seu significado.
Downloads
Referências
BARTHES, Roland. El Mensaje Fotográfico. In: BARTHES, Roland. Lo Obvio y lo Obtuso: Imágenes, gestos, voces. Barcelona: Paidós, 1986. p. 11-28.
BARTHES, Roland. Rhetoric of the Image. In: HEATH Stephen (ed.). Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana, 1977. p. 32-51
BECK, Ulrich. La sociedad del riesgo: Hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 1986.
BERGER, Peter; LUCKMANN, Thomas. La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores, 1968.
COULDRY, Nick; HEPP, Andreas. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2016.
BOLTER, Jay David; GRUISIN, Richard. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press, 2000.
CARRUTHERS, David. Environmental politics in Chile: Legacies of dictatorship and democracy. Third World Quarterly, London, n. 22, p. 343-358, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590120061642.
COLOMBO, Gabriele; NIEDERER, Sabine. Visual Methods for Online Images: Collection, Circulation, and Machine Co-Creation. Diseña, Santiago de Chile, n. 19, p. Intro, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.19.Intro.
COX, Robert; PEZZULLO, Phaedra. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. 4. ed. Los Angeles, CA, US: Sage, 2016.
DE LUCA, Kevin Michael; y DEMO, Anne Teresa. Imaging nature: Watkins, Yosemite, and the birth of environmentalism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, London, v. 17, n. 3, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295030009388395.
DE LUCA, Kevin Michael; y PEEPLES, Jennifer. From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, London, v. 19, n. 2, p. 125-151, 2002.
DOERR, Nicole; MILMAN, Noa. Working with Images. In: DELLA PORTA, Donatella (ed.) Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford University Press, 2014. p. 418-445.
DRUCKER, Johanna. Visualization and Interpretation. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press, 2020.
DOYLE, Julie. Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication. Science as Culture, London, v. 16, n. 2, p. 129-150, 2007.
EDER, Klaus. The Social Construction of Nature. London: SAGE Publications, 1996.
EVANS COMFORT, Suzannah; HESTER, Joe Bob. Three Dimensions of Social Media Messaging Success by Environmental NGOs. Environmental Communication, London, n. 13, v. 3, p. 281-286, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1579746.
FIFKA, Matthias; KÜHN, Anna-Lena; LOZA ADAUI, Cristian; STIGLBAUER, Markus. Promoting Development in Weak Institutional Environments: The Understanding and Transmission of Sustainability by NGOS in Latin America. Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ, [S. l.], n. 27, p. 1091-1122, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9713-4.
GARRETT, R. Kelly. Protest in an information society: A review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communication & Society, London, v. 9, n. 2, p. 202-224, 2006.
GERODIMOS, Roman. The Interdisciplinary Roots and Digital Branches of Visual Political Communication Research. In: VENETI, Anastasia; JACKSON, Daniel; LILLEKER, Darren. (ed.). Visual Political Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. p. 52-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3.
HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Arnold, 1979.
HALLIDAY, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold, c1985.
HAND, Martin. Visuality in Social Media: Researching images, circulations and practices. In: SLOAN, Luke; QUAN-HAASE, Anabel. (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Social Media Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017.
HANSEN, Anders. Using visual images for showing environmental problems. In: FILL, Alwin; PENZ, Hermine (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. London: Routledge, 2018. P. 179-195.
HANSEN, Anders. Communication, Media, and the Social Construction of the Environment. In: HANSEN, Anders; COX, Robert. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London: Routledge, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887586.
HANSEN, Anders. Environment, Media and Communication. London: Routledge, 2010.
HURLEY, Zoe. Imagined Affordances of Instagram and the Fantastical Authenticity of Female Gulf-Arab Social Media Influencers. Social Media + Society, Thousand Oaks, CA, v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-16, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118819241.
KATZ-KIMCHI, Merav; MANOSEVITCH, Idit. Mobilizing Facebook Users against Facebook’s Energy Policy: The Case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign. Environmental Communication, London, v. 9, n. 2, p. 248-267, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993413.
KRIPPENDORF, Klaus. Content Analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 3. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
KRESS, Gunther; VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. Reading images: the grammar of visual design. 2. ed. London: Routledge, 2006.
LEONARDI, Paul M. Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility. Information Systems Research, Catonsville, MD, v. 25, n. 4, p. 796-816, 2014.
LILLEKER, Darren; VENETI, Anastasia; JACKSON, Daniel. Introduction: Visual Political Communication. In: VENETI, Anastasia; JACKSON, Daniel; LILLEKER, Darren (ed.). Visual Political Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. p. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3.
LILLEKER, Darren. The Power of Visual Political Communication: Pictorial Politics Through the Lens of Communication Psychology. In: VENETI, Anastasia; JACKSON, Daniel; LILLEKER, Darren (ed.). Visual Political Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. p. 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3.
MANZINI, Ezio. Politics of the Everyday. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.
MANZO, Kate. Imaging vulnerability: The iconography of climate change. Area, [S. l.], v. 42, n. 1, p. 96-107, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00887.x.
MARTINEC, Radan; SALWAY, Andrew. A system for image–text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, London, v. 4, n. 3, p. 337-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357205055928. 2005.
MIRZOEFF, Nicholas. Cómo ver el mundo. Tradução de Pablo Hermida Lazcano. Barcelona: Paidós, 2016.
NASIRITOUSI Naghmeh. NGOs and the environment. In: DAVIS, Thomas (ed.) Routledge Handbook of NGOs and International Relations. London: Routledge, 2019. p. 329-342
NOVELLI, Edoardo. Visual Political Communication in Italian Electoral Campaigns. In: VENETI, Anastasia; JACKSON, Daniel; LILLEKER, Darren (ed.). Visual Political Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. p. 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18729-3.
O’NEILL, Saffron J.; BOYKHOFF, Maxwell; NIEMEYER, Simon; DAY, Sophie A. On the use of imagery for climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change, Amsterdam, v. 23, n. 2, p. 413-421, 2013.
RUBINSTEIN, Daniel; SLUIS, Katrina. A Life More Photographic. Photographies, London, v. 1, n. 1, p. 9-28, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/17540760701785842.
ROSE, Gillian. Visual Methodologies. London: Sage, 2002.
SAUNDERS, Clare; ROTH, Silke. NGOs and social movement theory. In: DAVID, Thomas (ed.) Routledge Handbook of NGOs and International Relations. London: Routledge, 2019. p. 138-152.
VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. Multimodality and Multimodal Research. In: PAUWELS, Luc; MANNAY, Dawn (ed.). The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. 2. ed. London: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2020. p. 549-569. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526417015.
VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge, 2005.
WAGNER, Jon. Seeing things visual research and material culture. In: MARGOLIS, Eric; PAUWELS, Luc (ed.). The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, c2011. p. 72-96. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781446268278.
WCS. 120 Years, A Conservation Legacy. In: WCS. [S. l.], 2016. Disponible en: http://fscdn.wcs.org/2016/03/01/9kmyv16g9x_WCS_historical_timeline_February_2016.pdf. Consultado el: 9 jun. 2022.
WCS. Saving Wildlife and Wild Places. In: WCS. [S. l.], [2019]. Disponible en: https://c532f75abb9c1c021b8c-e46e473f8aadb72cf2a8ea564b4e6a76.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/2019/12/10/7vq8cbw8fo_WCS_Saving_Wildlife_Wild_Places_brochure_FINAL.pdf. Consultado el: 9 jun. 2022.
WE ARE SOCIAL Y HOOTSUITE. Digital 2022, Global Overview Report. We Are Social. In: Hootsuite. [S. l.], 2022. Disponible en: https://www.hootsuite.com/resources/digital-trends. Consultado el: 9 jun. 2022.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista FAMECOS
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais
A submissão de originais para a Revista Famecos implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos da revista sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente a Revista Famecos como o meio da publicação original.
Licença Creative Commons
Exceto onde especificado diferentemente, aplicam-se à matéria publicada neste periódico os termos de uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite o uso irrestrito, a distribuição e a reprodução em qualquer meio desde que a publicação original seja corretamente citada.
