Student permanence and academic success

The voice of the actors

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2022.1.43977

Keywords:

higher education, student persistence, professor perspective, student perspective

Abstract

 

 This article presents the advances along the training trajectory, in addition to qualitative results of a quanti-quali study based on focus groups. It analyzes the perspectives of five professors and five students, from an institution in the south of Brazil, on student permanence in higher education, taking into account, by the factors pointed out in the literature, engagement as one of the important aspects in studies for permanence. Thus, taking as a reference, Tinto (1987, 2012, 2017, 2020), Kohls-Santos (2020, 2021, 2022), Trowler (2010), Coates (2007), the relevance of personal motivation, the relationship between peers is identified and extracurricular activities for student permanence, which can help institutions to rethink their strategies to reduce dropout rates. The responses of professors and students allow us to recognize the importance of creating a bond between them, in which students feel recognized from the accompaniment of their professors. The variables that emerge in the study take us to a different level, beyond the merely economic, since they place the student as an active participant in their training process and the teachers and institutions responsible for the paradigm shift that must occur in education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pricila Kohls-Santos, Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília, DF, Brasil.

Doutora em Educação pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil; mestre em Educação pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Professora da Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), em Brasília, DF, Brasil. Líder do grupo de pesquisa interdisciplinar em Tecnologia, Internacionalização e Permanência – GeTIPE/CNPq/UCB. Membro da RedGUIA e integrante do Comitê Gestor (2022-2024). 

References

Bain, K. (2014). Lo que hacen los mejores estudiantes de universidad. Universitat de València.

Barbour, R. (2009). Grupos focais. Artmed.

Bawden, R. (2013). O objetivo educador da educação superior para o desenvolvimento humano e social no contexto da globalização. GUNI. Educação superior em um tempo de transformação: novas dinâmicas para a responsabilidade. EdiPUCRS.

Callender, C., Ramsden, P., & Griggs, J. (2014). Review of the’National Student Survey’: report to the UK higher education funding bodies. NatCen Social Research; The Institute of Education; University of London; The Institute for Employment Studies.

Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600801878

Eisner, E. W. (2017). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Teachers College Press.

Estrada Mejía, P., & Kohls-Santos, P. (2022). Permanência estudantil e articulação entre educação básica e superior: estado do conhecimento. In, P. Kohls-Santos, & P. Estrada Mejía (Ed.), Modelo integracionista para a permanência estudantil: variáveis e perspectivas (1. ed., pp. 23-38). Editora CRV.

Gale, T., Mills, C., & Cross, R. (2017). Socially inclusive teaching: Belief, design, action as pedagogic work. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116685754

Gabriel, K. F. (2008). Teaching unprepared students: Strategies for promoting success and retention in higher education. Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Gómez, Á. I. P. (2015). Educação na era digital: a escola educativa. Penso Editora.

Klemenčič, M., & Chirikov, I. (2015). How do we know how students experience higher education? On the use of student surveys. In The European Higher Education Area (pp. 361-379). Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_24

Kohls-Santos, P. (2020). Permanência na Educação Superior: desafios e perspectivas. Brasília: Cátedra UNESCO de Juventude, Educação e Sociedade.

Kohls-Santos, P. (2022). Modelo integracionista para a permanência estudantil. In P. Kohls-Santos & P. Estrada Mejía (Ed.), Modelo integracionista para a permanência estudantil: variáveis e perspectivas (1. ed., pp. 23-38). Editora CRV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24824/978652512046.1

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of management learning & education, 4(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566

Malhotra, N. K. (2006). Pesquisa de Marketing: Uma Orientação Aplicada. Bookman Editora.

Marconi, M. D. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (1992). Metodologia do trabalho científico. São Paulo: Atlas, 6.

Martins, L. M., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017). Engajamento do estudante no ensino superior como indicador de avaliação. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, 22(1), 223-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-40772017000100012

Moraes, R., & Galiazzi, M. C. (2007). Análise textual discursiva. Ed. Unijuí.

Nóvoa, Antonio (Coord). (1997). The teachers and their formation. Dom Quixote.

Parra, C. M. P., Gónzalez, G. R., Manco, O. C. U., Gómez, E. C., Mejía, P. E., Zuleta, E. M. U., ... & Herrera, R. R. M. (2015). Relación del Autoconcepto y del acompañamiento psicopedagógico con el rendimiento académico en estudiantes de primer semestre de ingeniería. Ingeniería y Sociedad, 1(9), 40-66. https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/ingeso/article/view/25046

Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current issues in education, 14(1). http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/download/745/162

Santos, P. K. D. (2015). Permanência na graduação a distância na perspectiva dos estudantes: um estudo a partir da experiência do projeto Alfa Guia.

Solís, P., Rodríguez Rocha, E., & Brunet, N. (2013). Orígenes sociales, instituciones, y decisiones educativas en la transición a la educación media superior: el caso del Distrito Federal. Revista mexicana de investigación educativa, 18(59), 1103-1136. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-66662013000400005

Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change (Vol. 219). CreateSpace.

Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226804545.001.0001

Tinto, V. (2017b). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115621917

Tinto, V. (2017). Reflections on student persistence. Student Success, 8(2), 1-9. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A501403011/AONE?u=anon~90e3cf64&sid=googleScholar&xid=7fe4e448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.376

Tinto, V. (2020). Learning better together. Transitioning Students in Higher Education: Philosophy, Pedagogy and Practice. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429279355-3

Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. The higher education academy, 11(1), 1-15.

Published

2022-12-13

How to Cite

Kohls-Santos, P. (2022). Student permanence and academic success: The voice of the actors. Educação, 45(1), e43977. https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2022.1.43977

Issue

Section

50 years PPGEDU PUCRS