That’s enough about ethnography! An education of attention as purpose of anthropology

Authors

  • Tim Ingold Universidade de Aberdeen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2016.3.21690

Keywords:

Correspondence. Education. Ethnography. Fieldwork. Method. Observant participation. Theory.

Abstract

In anthropology and other disciplines, “ethnography” has become so over-used a term that it has lost much of its meaning. It is argued that attributing “ethnography” to encounters with those among whom the research is done – and field work in general – is to jeopardize the ontological commitment and educational purpose of anthropology as a discipline, as well as its main way of working, participant observation. It also means reproducing a pernicious distinction between hose with whom one studies and learns in and out of academia, respectively. It is this obsession of anthropology with ethnography that has, more than anything else, undermined its public voice. To recover it, one must reaffirm its value as a future-oriented discipline, dedicated to reshaping the rupture between imagination and real life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tim Ingold, Universidade de Aberdeen

Tim Ingold is currently professor of Social Anthropology at the University of Aberdeen.

References

ALPERS, Svetlana. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. London: Penguin, 1983.

BESTEMAN, Catherine; HAUGERUD, Angelique. The desire for relevance. AnthropologyToday, v. 29, n. 6, p. 1-2, 2013.

BURRIDGE, Kenelm. Other people’s religions are absurd. In explorations in the anthropology of religion: essays in honour of Jan Van Baal, edited by E. A. VAN BEEK, Walter and SCHERER, J. H. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975. p. 8-24.

DA COL, Giovanni; GRAEBER, David. Foreword: The return of ethnographic theory. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, v. 1, n. 1, p. vi–xxv, 2011. https:/doi.org/10.14318/hau1.1.001

DURANTI, Alessandro. Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropological Theory, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-20, 2010. https:/doi.org/10.1177/1463499610370517

FABIAN, Johannes. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

HOCKEY, Jenny; FORSEY, Martin. Ethnography is not participant observation: reflections on the interview as participatory qualitative research. In the interview: an ethnographic approach, edited by Jonathan Skinner. New York: Berg, 2012. p. 69-87.

INGOLD, Tim. Editorial. Man, New Series, v. 27, n. 4, p. 693-696, 1992.

______. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling, and skill. London: Routledge, 2000.

______. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge, and description. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.

______. Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and, architecture. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.

INGOLD, Tim; PÁLSSON, Gísli (eds.). Biosocial becomings: integrating social and biological anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

JACKSON, Michael. Paths toward a clearing: radical empiricism and ethnographic inquiry. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989.

______. Essays in existential anthropology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

MASSCHELEIN, Jan. The idea of critical e-ducational research – e-ducating the gaze and inviting to go walking. In the possibility/impossibility of a new critical language of education, edited by Ilan Gur-Ze’ev. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2010a. p. 275-291.

______. E-ducating the gaze: the idea of a poor pedagogy. Ethics and Education, v. 5, n. 1, p. 43-53, 2010b. https:/doi.org/10.1080/17449641003590621

MACLEAN, Stuart. All the difference in the world: liminality, montage, and the reinvention of comparative anthropology. In: Transcultural montage, edited by Christian Suhr and Rane Willerslev. New York: Berghahn, 2013, p. 58-75.

MILLS, C. Wright. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959.

RORTY, Richard. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.

SPERBER, Dan. On anthropological knowledge: three essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, 1985.

Published

2016-12-22

How to Cite

Ingold, T. (2016). That’s enough about ethnography! An education of attention as purpose of anthropology. Educação, 39(3), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2016.3.21690

Issue

Section

Other Topics