Morphology and spelling in the process of learning to write in elementary school

a study in light of Karmiloff-Smith's Representational Redescription model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2025.1.47902

Keywords:

morphology, spelling, writing, elementary education

Abstract

This article, which focuses on the relationship between orthography and morphology in the learning of writing in Brazilian Portuguese, aims to analyze how morphological knowledge guides students' graphic choices in cases of homophonic structures, namely the derivational morpheme -ice and the verbal ending -sse, in order to reflect on the type of access to knowledge related to this level of grammar. The discussion is based on data from 3rd, 5th and 9th grade students from a municipal public school, collected from two instruments: a writing test developed for the study and a clinical interview. The results of the writing data are treated quantitatively, and the responses obtained in the interviews are used as input for qualitative analysis guided by Karmiloff-Smith's Representational Redescription Model (RRM) (1986, 1992). The results show that, as the grades progress, explicit access to morphological knowledge of the language increases, which contributes considerably to the production of correct spellings and, consequently, to learning spelling, thus demonstrating the importance of the role of schooling in the language teaching-learning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tamires Pereira Duarte Goulart, Catholic University of Pelotas (UCPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Supervising Professor at the Department of Education of Canguçu/RS. PhD in Education (UFPEL). Post-doctoral researcher in Inclusive Special Education (UFPEL). Master's degree in Applied Linguistics (UCPEL). Bachelor's degree in Letters - Portuguese/English. Bachelor's degree in Pedagogy. Trainer in courses for teachers, with themes in the area of ​​Education on Literacy, Early Childhood Education, Inclusion, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. She worked as a state trainer for LEEI-Sul. Her research interests lie in the area of ​​language acquisition, especially the acquisition of phonology and morphology of spoken and written languages, and in interdisciplinary research in education that includes literacy, alphabetization, learning difficulties and acquisition of the written system of the Portuguese language, neurodevelopmental disorders, early childhood education, and inclusive classroom practices. Author of the didactic material Trilhas PARC-RS, from the Alfabetiza Tchê/RS Program.

Ana Ruth Moresco Miranda, Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL), Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Full Professor at the Federal University of Pelotas (UFPEL). Holds a Bachelor's degree in Letters from UFPEL, and a Master's and Doctorate in Letters from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS). Completed postdoctoral studies in Linguistics at the University of Barcelona (2014) and the University of Lisbon (2024) on Language Acquisition (writing and phonology). Works in the Postgraduate Programs in Education and Letters at UFPEL, conducting research on writing acquisition, primarily on orthography and its relationship with phonology. Has experience in the areas of Linguistics and Education, with an emphasis on Psycholinguistics, working mainly on the following themes: phonology acquisition, writing acquisition, language acquisition, phonology, and mother tongue teaching. Coordinator of the Study Group on Written Language Acquisition (GEALE).

References

BARBOSA, V.; GUIMARAES, S.; ROSA, J. O Impacto do Ensino de Regras Morfológicas na Escrita. Psico-USF, Bragança Paulista, v. 20, n. 2, p. 309-321, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200211

BECHARA, E. Moderna gramática portuguesa. 3. ed. rev., ampl. e atual. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1999.

BRYANT, P.; DEACON, H.; NUNES, T. Morphology and spelling: what have morphemes to do with spelling? Handbook of ortography and literacy. [S. l.: s. n.], 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1731-1_6

CÂMARA JUNIOR, J. M. Estrutura da língua portuguesa. 23. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1995. Originalmente publicado em 1970.

CORREA, Jane. Metacognição e aprendizagem: considerações teóricas. In: CONGRESSO NORTE-NORDESTE DE PSICOLOGIA, 5., 2007, Maceió. Anais [...]. Maceió, 2007. p. 323-324.

CARRAHER, T. N. O método clínico: usando os exames de Piaget. São Paulo: Cortez, 1989.

GOMES. C. A.; BARBOSA, M. F. M. Aquisição de palavras complexas no português brasileiro: a emergência de morfologia derivacional na fala infantil. Semântica e terminologia. Rio de Janeiro: CIFEFIL, 2014.

KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. Beyond Modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1579.001.0001

KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. From Constructivism to Neuroconstructivism: The Activity Dependent Structuring of the Human Brain. [S. l.: s. n.], 2010.

KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. Más allá de la modularidad: la ciencia cognitiva desde la perspectiva del desarrollo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1994.

KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children´s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, [s. l.], n. 23, p. 95-147, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90040-5

LANDSMANN, L. T. Aprendizagem da linguagem escrita: processos evolutivos e implicações didáticas. São Paulo: Ática, 1995.

LAROCA, M. N. C. Manual de Morfologia do Português. 2. ed. São Paulo: Pontes, 2001.

LEMLE, M. Guia teórico do alfabetizador. 17. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2007.

LORANDI, A.; MARQUES, D. M. Subsídios teóricos e práticos para a elaboração de testes de consciência linguística. Revista Escrita, Rio de Janeiro, v. 21, p. 1-20, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.escrita.25993

LUFT, C. P. Moderna gramática brasileira. 11. ed. São Paulo: Globo, 1991. 193 p.

MARTINET, A. Elementos de linguística geral. 2. ed. São Paulo: Editora Livraria Sá da Costa, 1970. Originalmente publicado em 1960.

NUNES, T.; BRYANT, P. Improving literacy through teaching morphemes. London: Routledge, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969557

OLIVEIRA, M. C. O uso do modo verbal em estruturas de complementação no Português do Brasil. 2007. 141 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Instituto de Letras, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2007.

PERINI, Mário Alberto. Para que estudar gramática. In: PERINI, M. A. Gramática do português brasileiro. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2010. p. 29-41.

PEZATTI, E. G. A gramática da derivação sufixal: os sufixos formadores de substantivos abstratos. Alfa, São Paulo, n. 34, p. 153-174, 1990.

PIRES, F. O impacto do ensino de estratégias morfológicas no desenvolvimento da escrita: um estudo de intervenção. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências da Educação Especialidade Educação Especial) – Escola Superior de Educação de Lisboa, Lisboa, 2010.

SAID ALI, M. Gramática Histórica Portuguesa. 3. ed. São Paulo: Melhoramento, 1964.

SCHWINDT, L. C. Manual de Linguística: fonologia, morfologia e sintaxe. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2014.

SEYMOUR, P. H. K. O desenvolvimento inicial da leitura em ortografias europeias. In: SNOWLING, M. J.; HULME, C. (org.). A ciência da leitura. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2013. Originalmente publicado em 2005.

WUERGES, T. E. A Aquisição da Morfologia Verbal por Crianças Falantes de Português Brasileiro e o uso de Formas Variantes. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – USP, São Paulo, 2014.

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Pereira Duarte Goulart, T., & Moresco Miranda, A. R. (2025). Morphology and spelling in the process of learning to write in elementary school: a study in light of Karmiloff-Smith’s Representational Redescription model. Letrônica, 18(1), e47902. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2025.1.47902