From the colonial cradle to non-linear dynamics
The awakening of speech perception in phonology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2022.1.42641Keywords:
phonology, speech perception, complexityAbstract
Although we know speech perception plays a central role in language development, its adoption in the phonological theory has faced theoretical and methodological-technological resistance. However, interest in the area has increased for two main reasons: technological advances in speech sciences and the attempts to incorporate perceptual principles into traditional phonological models. In this article, we advocate that the late awakening of speech perception in phonology is related to its colonial cradle and to the way in which some Cartesian linguistic theories/models see and validate the individual and the individual acts, and, consequently, speech production and perception, constructs that in classical models of phonology do not fit in the definitions of language. The marginalization of perception is related to the “epistemicide” (SANTOS, 2019, p. 28) caused by hegemonic scientific (linguistic) paradigms supported by the privileged modern science. Thus, in this work, we seek to decolonize phonology, based on a scientific proposal grounded in Complexity, bringing to light a critical interpretation of the langue-parole dichotomy. In the perspective adopted in this text, the phonological grammar is guided by individual surface actions, and the perception of its phonic units becomes essential in order for it to be instantiated.
Downloads
References
ALBANO, E. O gesto e suas bordas: esboço de fonologia acústico-articulatória do português brasileiro. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2001.
ALBANO, E. O tear encantado: tecnologia, complexidade e imaginário interdisciplinar sobre a linguagem. Remate de Males, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 1, p. 41-57, 2009. Dossiê Tecnologia das Letras. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/remate.v29i1.8636287
ALBANO, E. O gesto audível: fonologia como pragmática. São Paulo: Cortez, 2020.
ASHBY, M.; MAIDMENT, J. Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808852
BECKNER, C.; BLYTHE, R.; BYBEE, J.; CHRISTIANSEN, M. H.; CROFT, W.; ELLIS, N. C.; HOLLAND, J.; KE, J.; LARSEN-FREEMAN, D.; SCHOENEMANN, T. Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Language Learning, [S. l.], v. 59, p. 1-26, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x
BERTICELLI, I. Educação em perspectivas epistemológicas pós-modernas. Chapecó: Editora Argos, 2010.
BOERSMA, P; WEENINK, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (programa computacional, versão 6.2.05). [S. l.]: Praat, 2022. Disponível em: http://www.praat.org. Acesso em: 2022.
BRESCANCINI, C.; GOMES, C. Fonética versus Fonologia? Letras de Hoje, Porto Alegre, v. 49, p. 5-10, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2014.1.17283
BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology, [S. l.], v. 3, p. 219-252, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000658
BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, [S. l.], v. 6, p. 201-251, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001019
BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, [S. l.], v. 49, p. 155-180, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913
BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Dynamics and articulatory phonology. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, [S. l.], SR-113, p. 51-62, 1993.
BYBEE, J. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886
BYBEE, J. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526
CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
CHOMSKY, N.; HALLE, M. The sound pattern of English. Nova Iorque: Harper and Row, 1968.
CILLIERS, P. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012253
COELHO, O.; FINBOW, T. Apontamentos para uma história linguística transatlântica e descolonizada do português no Brasil: o contato e a diversidade em foco. In: VIEIRA, F. E.; BAGNO, M. (org.). História das línguas, histórias da linguística: homenagem a Carlos Alberto Faraco. São Paulo: Parábola, 2020. p. 61-84.
COHN, A. Phonetics in phonology and phonology in phonetics. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, [S. l.], v. 16, p. 1-31, 2007.
CRISTÓFARO-SILVA, T.; GOMES, C. Fonologia na perspectiva dos modelos de exemplares. In: GOMES, C. (org.). Fonologia na perspectiva dos modelos de exemplares. São Paulo: Contexto, 2020. p. 13-36.
DE BOT, K.; LOWIE, W.; VERSPOOR, M. Introduction. In: VERSPOOR, M.; DE BOT, K.; LOWIE, W. (org.). A dynamic approach to second language development: methods and techniques. Amsterdã: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2011. p. 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.00toc
FERREIRA-GONÇALVES, G.; KUPSKE, F. Um caso de opacidade fonológica na aquisição do PB: um problema ótimo ou uma questão exemplar? Leitura: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras (UFAL), [S. l.], v. 2, p. 125-148, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28998/0103-6858.2010v2n46p125-148
FOWLER, C. Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing control. Journal of Phonetics, [S. l.], v. 8, p. 113-133, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31446-9
FOWLER, C. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, v. 14, p. 3-28, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2
GOLDSTEIN, L.; FOWLER, C. Articulatory phonology: a phonology for public language use. In: MEYER, A.; SCHILLER, N. (org.). Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities. Berlim: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. p. 159-207.
HAUGEN, E. The ecology of language. In: FILL, A; MÜHLHÄUSLER, P. (org.). The ecolinguistics reader. Londres: Continuum, 2001. p. 57-66.
HAYES, B. Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In: DARNELL, M.; MORAVCSIK, E.; NOONAN, M.; NEWMEYER, F.; WHEATLEY, K. (org.). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics: Volume I: General papers. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 243-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.41.13hay
HAYES, B.; STERIADE, D. Introduction: The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In: HAYES, B.; KIRCHNER, R.; STERIADE, D. (org.). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486401.001
HORN, J. Human research and Complexity Theory. Educational philosophy and theory, [S. l.], v. 40, n.1, p. 130-143, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00395.x
HUME, E.; JOHNSON, K. The role of speech perception in phonology. São Diego: Academic Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454095
JOOS, M. Acoustic phonetics. Language, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 2, 1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/522229
KEATING, P. The phonology-phonetics interface. In: NEWMEYER, F. (org.). The Cambridge linguistic survey: Linguistic theory: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 281-302.
KENT, R.; READ, C. The acoustic analysis of speech. Londres: Cengage Learning, 1992.
KINGSTON, J. The phonetics-phonology interface. In: LACY, P. (org.). The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 401-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.018
KUPSKE, F. A complex approach on integrated late bilinguals’ English VOT production: a study on South Brazilian immigrants in London. Ilha do Desterro, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 3, p. 81-93, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p81
KUPSKE, F. Destabilizing effects of L2 explicit pronunciation instruction on L1 speech: Voice Onset Time production by Brazilian intermediate users of English. Gradus: Revista Brasileira de Fonologia de Laboratório, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 32-49, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47627/gradus.v6i2.174
KUPSKE, F.; PEROZZO, R.; ALVES, U. Sound change as a Complex Dynamic phenomenon and the blurriness of grammar stability. Macabéa: Revista Eletrônica do Netlli, v. 8, n. 2, p. 158-172, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47295/mren.v8i2.1966
LADD, R. Phonetics in phonology. In: GOLDSMITH, J.; RIGGLE, J.; YU, A. (org.). Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2011. p. 348-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch11
LADEFOGED, P. A Course in Phonetics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 2001.
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. Complexity theory: a new way to think. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 363-373, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982013000200002
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. Complexity theory: the lessons continue. In: ORTEGA, L.; HAN, Z. (org.). Complexity theory and language development: in celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdã: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. p. 11-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.02lar
LEGENDRE, G.; MIYATA, Y.; SMOLENSKY, P. Can connectionism contribute to syntax? Harmonic Grammar, with an application. In: ZIOLKOWSKI, M.; NOSKE, M.; DEATON, K. (org.). Proceedings of the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1990.
LIMA JR., R.; ALVES, U.; KUPSKE, F. Introdução a pesquisas de sons não nativos. In: KUPSKE, F.; ALVES, U.; LIMA JR., R. (org.). Investigando os sons de línguas não nativas: uma introdução. Campinas: Editora da Abralin, 2021. p. 15-40.
LISKER, L.; ABRAMSON, A. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 3, p. 384-422, 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
MORIN, E. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.
MORIN, E. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. São Paulo: Sulina, 2015.
PEROZZO, R. Sobre as esferas cognitiva, acústico-articulatória e realista indireta da percepção fônica não-nativa: Para além do PAM-L2. 2017. 225 f. Tese (Doutorado em Estudos da Linguagem) — Instituto de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2017.
PEROZZO, R.; KUPSKE, F. Speech perception and production as constructs of action: Implications for models of L2 development. Revista X, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 5, p. 1231-1257, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rvx.v16i5.81296
PIERREHUMBERT, J. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In: BYBEE, J.; HOPPER, H. (org.). Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 2001. p. 137-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie
PIERREHUMBERT, J. Probabilistic Phonology: Discrimination and Robustness. In: BOD, R.; HAY, J.; JANNEDY, S. (org.). Probability Theory in Linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003. p. 177-228.
PIERREHUMBERT, J. Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, [S. l.], v. 2, p. 33-52, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050
PRINCE, A.; SMOLENSKY, P. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report RuCCSTR-2. [S. l.]: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, 1993.
RAUBER, A; RATO, A; KLUGE, D; SANTOS, G; FIGUEIREDO, M. TP: Teste de percepção (programa computacional). [S. l.]: Worken, c2009. Disponível em: www.worken. com.br/tp_regfree.php. Acesso em: 2022.
SANTOS, B. O fim do império cognitivo: a afirmação das epistemologias do sul. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2019.
SAUSSURE, F. Curso de Linguística Geral. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006.
SILVA, J.; CARDOSO, R.; KUPSKE, F. Desenvolvimento linguístico e diferenças individuais: uma discussão dinâmico complexa sobre a generalização de dados. In: ALMEIDA, A.; BATISTA, A.; KUPSKE, F. F.; ZOGHBI, D. (org.). Língua em movimento: Estudos em linguagem e interação. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2020. p. 309-326.
STEWART, I. Em busca do infinito: uma história da matemática dos primeiros números à teoria do caos. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2014.
TRUBETSKOY, N. Principes de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck, 1949.
UBEROI, J. Science and Culture. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Letrônica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.