Production of GT 20 Educational Psychology at ANPEd
expression of science, school education, and contemporary society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1981-2582.2023.1.44760Keywords:
Educational psychology, (auto)biographic research, school educationAbstract
This paper presents the results of a study about the production of the GT20 - Psicologia da Educação da ANPEd, based on readings and analysis of 79 papers presented at annual meetings from 2013 to 2021. The study takes place in a moment of mobilization in the resumption of democratic practices in public policy, and attention is focused on structural inequality - which is materialized in real people who teach and learn. It is justified by the need to take stock of the course taken by the GT20 and debate on new demands and future directions. It is understood that the presented papers express the academic research about Educational Psychology as a field of study and a discipline of educational foundations. The objective of the study is to identify what the GT20 investigates, how it does it, the results achieved and their implications and unfoldings, the theoretical bases that subsidize it. Methodologically, this is a documental study, in which the papers presented in national meetings (communications or posters) were mapped and analyzed. We established the focus of attention: titles, authorship, institutional affiliation, keywords, objectives, methodology, theoretical framework, and results, as well as the sources used (authors and works). The analyses and syntheses were done by identifying the frequency in which they were presented, and the descriptions made. As results of the study of the production of the GT20, the following can be highlighted (a) identification of criticism to the theories of Psychology; (b) highlights to possible contributions of critical theories to subsidize the formation and teaching performance; (c) conceptions of learning and development; (d) contributions to the consolidation of theoretical matrixes that may face the discussion of current problems; (e) development of theoretical studies and field/applied research, involving burning issues of contemporary society that manifest themselves at school; (f) integration of different fields of knowledge to compose the theoretical and methodological corpus of educational psychology; (g) area’s commitment to inclusive society and education in tackling inequalities; (h) attention to individual suffering (of teachers and students) linked to socio-historical issues and, (i) identification of the multiple determinations that contribute for schooling to act in a more or less incisive way in the human-generic formation of those who are served by the school or work in it. We conclude on the importance of this GT20 as a space for aggregation and expression of science/ academia directions, its relevance for education (in its two levels, its stages and modalities) and for society in general. And, above all, that educational psychology constitutes an exponential field for the understanding and analysis of educational problems.
Downloads
References
Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação. (1990). 13ª Reunião Anual. Boletim da ANPEd, 12(1-2), 1-91. https://anped.org.br/sites/default/files/ boletim_anped_v.12_n.1_2_jan._dez.1990.pdf
Carvalho, D. C. de, Facci, M. G. D., & Barroco, S. M. S. (2010). A produção científica do GT de Psicologia da Educação da ANPEd e a apropriação de teorias psicológicas. Psicologia da Educação, (31), 79-104.
Delari Júnior, A. (2019). Questões de Método em Vigotski: busca da verdade e caminhos da cognição. In S. C. Tuleski, & M. Chaves, H. A. Leite (Orgs.), Materialismo histórico-dialético como fundamento da teoria históricocultural: método e metodologia de pesquisa. EDUEM.
Grazziotin, L. S., Klaus, V., & Pereira, A. P. M. (2022). Pesquisa documental histórica e pesquisa bibliográfica: focos de estudo e percursos metodológicos. ProPosições, 33, e20200141. https://www.scielo.br/j/pp/a/ GJCbBcY4rdVdvQY56T9qLRQ/?lang=pt DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-6248-2020-0141
Günther, H. (2006). Pesquisa qualitativa versus pesquisa quantitativa: esta é a questão? Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 22(2), 201-210. https://www.scielo.br/j/ptp/a/ HMpC4d5cbXsdt6RqbrmZk3J/?format=pdf&lang=pt DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722006000200010
Brasil. (2014). Lei n.13.005, de 25 de junho de 2014. Aprova o Plano Nacional de Educação–PNE e dá outras providências. Casa Civil; Presidência da República. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011- 2014/2014/lei/l13005.htm
Lima, T. C. S. de, & Mioto, R. C. T. (2007). Procedimentos metodológicos na construção do conhecimento científico: a pesquisa bibliográfica. Rev. Katál., 10(esp.), 37- 45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-49802007000300004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-49802007000300004
Patto, M. H. S. (2022). A produção do fracasso escolar: histórias de submissão e rebeldia. Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/9786587596334
Paulo. https://www. livrosabertos.sibi.usp.br/portaldelivrosUSP/catalog/ view/932/844/3069
Pereira, M. V. (2021). Educação e arte. dez anos de trajetória do GT24. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 26, e260043. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413- 24782021260043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-24782021260043
Schlindwein, L. M., & Cordeiro, M. H. B. V. (2010). O Grupo de Trabalho Psicologia da Educação e sua produção entre os anos de 2005 e 2009. Psicologia da Educação, (31), 53-64.
Schlindwein, L. M., Souza, M. P. R., Silva, L. H., Asbahr, F. S. F., & Nadaleto, C. (2006). Grupo de Trabalho Psicologia da Educação: uma análise da produção acadêmica (1998-2004). Psicologia da Educação, (22), 141-160.
Severino, A. J. (2016). Metodologia do trabalho científico (24. ed. rev. e atual.).
Cortez. Souza, M. P. R., Miranda, M. G., & Placco, V. M. N. S. (2007). A Psicologia da Educação no contexto de novos desafios. Anais da 30a Reunião Anual da Anped. ANPEd. http://30reuniao.anped.org.br/trabalhos_encomendados/-trabalho%20encomendado%20encomendado%20gt20%20%20marilene%20vera-%20marilia%20-%20int.pdf
Tziminadis, J. L. F. (2017). Modernidade dessincronizada: aceleração social, destemporalizaçao e alienação: uma entrevista com Harmut Rosa. Estudos de Sociologia, 22(43), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.52780/res.10462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52780/res.10462
Wood Jr., T. (2016). Origens do produtivismo acadêmico e o caminho do impacto social do conhecimento. Ensino Superior Unicamp, 16, 1. https://www.revistaensinosuperior.gr.unicamp.br/artigos/origensdo-produtivismo-academico-e-o-caminho-doimpacto-social-do-conhecimento.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Educação
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Educação implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Educação as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.