Más allá de la superficie
sobre el concepto de Sistema Internacional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2025.1.46232Palabras clave:
Sistema Internacional, Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales, Política InternacionalResumen
El concepto de Sistema Internacional es sobre valorizado como forma de describir el nivel sistémico de análisis de las relaciones internacionales. Esto conduce a un uso superficial del término, que a menudo lo sitúa como sinónimo de las propias relaciones internacionales o incluso de una supuesta estructura de las relaciones internacionales. Por ello, este artículo pretende discutir el concepto de Sistema Internacional, con el fin de presentar sus elementos constitutivos y las corrientes teóricas que lo utilizan. Señala la idoneidad limitada de la noción de Sistema Internacional frente a las múltiples exigencias del análisis de las relaciones internacionales; concluye que la reificación de este concepto sucumbe a una deficiencia teórica y, respectivamente, a un fracaso analítico.
Descargas
Citas
Ashley, Richard. 1995. “The powers of anarchy: theory, sovereignty and the domestication of global life.” In International theory: critical investigations, organizado por James der Derian. New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_6
Boulding, Kenneth. 1956. “General systems theory – the skeleton of science.” Management Science 2 (3): 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2.3.197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2.3.197
Braudel, Fernand. 1984. Civilization and capitalism. The perspective of the world. Vol. 3. Harper & Row.
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9_2
Bull, Hedley. 1966. The grotian conception of international society. In Diplomatic investigations: essays in the theory of international politics, organizado por Herbert Butterfield e Martin Wight. Allen and Unwin.
Buzan, Barry. 2018. Revisiting world society. International Politics 55 (1): 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0065-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0065-5
Buzan, Barry e James Little. 2000. International systems in world history: remaking the study of international relations. Oxford University Press.
Buzan, Barry e James Little. 1994. The idea of international system: theory meets history. International Political Science Review 15 (3): 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219401500302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219401500302
Carr, Edward. 2001. Vinte anos de crise: 1919-1939. Uma introdução ao estudo das Relações Internacionais. Editora da UnB.
Cox, Robert. 1986. Gramsci, hegemony and International Relations: an essay in method. In Gramsci, historical materialism and International Relations, organizado por Stephen Gill. Cambridge University Press.
Cox, Robert. 2000. Social forces, states and world orders: beyond International Relations theory. In International Relations: critical concepts in political cience, organizado por Andrew Linklater. Routledge.
Der Derian, James. 1995. A reinterpretation of realism: genealogy, semiology, dromology. In International theory: critical investigations, organizado por James Der Derian. New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_14
Goodman, Jay. 1965. The concept of ‘system’ in International Relations Theory. Background 8(4):257-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/3013730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3013730
Grotius, Hugo. 2004. O direito da guerra e da paz. Editora Unijuí.
Guimarães, Feliciano de Sá. 2021. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Editora Contexto.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. A constelação pós-nacional: ensaios políticos. Littera Mundi.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2012. Sobre a constituição da Europa: um ensaio. Editora Unesp.
Halliday, Fred. 1999. Repensando as Relações Internacionais. Editora da Ufrgs.
Jackson, Robert e Georg Sorensen. 2018. Introdução às Relações Internacionais. Editora Zahar.
Jung, João. 2020. A insuficiência lógica nas três imagens de Kenneth Waltz: uma crítica através do silogismo hegeliano. Opinião Filosófica 11 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v11i1E.912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v11i1E.912
Jung, João e Nythamar de Oliveira. 2023. Beyond International Society: The World Society idea from the english school to critical theory. Contexto Internacional 45 (2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.20234502e20220011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-8529.20234502e20220011
Keohane, Robert e Joseph Nye. 2001. Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little, Brown and Co.
Lapid, Yosef. 1989. The third debate: on the prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 235–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600457
Linklater, Andrew. 2000. The question of the next stage in International Relations theory: a critical-theoretical point of view. In International Relations: critical concepts in Political Science, organizado por Andrew Linklater. Routledge.
Morgenthau, Hans. 2003. A política entre as nações: a luta pelo poder e pela paz. Editora da UnB.
Nogueira, João P. e Nizar Messari. 2005. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Elsevier.
Rosenau, James e Ernst-Otto Czempiel. 2000. Governança sem governo. Editora da UnB.
Ruggie, John. 2000. Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in International Relations. In International Relations: critical concepts in Political Science, organizado por Andrew Linklater. Routledge.
Sarfati, Gilberto. 2005. Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Saraiva.
Singer, David. 1961. The level-of-analysis problem in International Relations. World Politics 14 (1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009557
Walker, Rob. 1989. History and structure in the theory of International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 18 (2): 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298890180020601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298890180020601
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. O sistema mundial moderno. A agricultura capitalista e as origens da economia-mundo europeia no século 16. Vol. I. Editora Afrontamentos.
Walt, Stephen. 2005. The relationship between theory and policy in International Relations. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 23–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104904
Waltz, Kenneth. 1959. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of international politics. Addison-Weasley.
Watson, Adam. 2004. A evolução da sociedade internacional. Editora da UnB.
Weber, Max. 2011. Ciência e política: duas vocações. Cultrix.
Wendt, Alexander. 1995. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. In International theory: critical investigations, organizado por James der Derian. New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_7
Wendt, Alexander. 1987. The agent-structure problem in International Relations theory. International Organization 41 (3): 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X
Wight, Martin. 2000. De systematibus civitatum. In International Relations: critical concepts in Political Science, organizado por Andrew Linklater. Routledge.
Wight, Martin. 1991. International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press.
Wight, Martin. 1960. Why is there no international theory? International Relations 2 (1): 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/004711786000200104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004711786000200104
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 João Henrique Salles Jung
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
