Between “emancipation” and domination: the global environmental narrative and the development policies of Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2020.2.32072Keywords:
Development. Global environmental narrative. AfricaAbstract
The article aims to understand the construction of the global environmentalist narrative and the place that the African continent occupies in it. To this end, it analyzes documents produced by the United Nations and the African Union, between 1972 and 2002, and which deal with the issue of development, nature and
the environment. The results of the analysis indicate that such a narrative obliged countries to incorporate the environmental dimension in their developmental policies. Given the prevailing poverty situation in Africa, however, the continent was seen as incapable of preserving nature and because of that should be under the tutelage of countries of the global north. It was suggested that these countries, through the expansion of their economic capital and technical assistance, would be able to eliminate the poverty of Africans and, consequently, prevent them from attacking nature. This situation, however, conflicted with the African development agenda initiated in the post-independence period, which saw in the exploration of
nature the path by which the continent would achieve its economic emancipation.
Downloads
References
Acslard, Henri. 2002. Justiça ambiental e construção social do risco. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 5: 49-60. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v5i0.22116.
Bertrand, M. L’Onu. 2004. Paris: La Découverte.
Brautigam, Deborah. 2009. The dragon gift: the real story of China in Africa. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cabral, Amílcar. 1980. A cultura nacional. In Amílcar Cabral, organizado por Carlos Comitini, 53-93. Rio de Janeiro: Codecri.
Dijk, Meine Pieter V. 2009. The new presence of China in Africa. Amsterdan: University Press.
Dos Santos, Theotonio. 2011. Imperialismo y dependencia. Caracas: Biblioteca Ayacucho.
Escobar, Arturo. 2004. Beyond the third world: imperial globality, global colonility and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly 25 (1): 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185417.
Giddens, Anthony. 2008. Sociologia. Lisboa: Galouste Gulbenkian.
Giddens, Anthony. 2009. The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hannigan, John. 2006. Environmental sociology. 2 ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203001806.
Hollander, Jack. 2003. The real environmental crisis: why poverty, not affluence, is the environment’s number one enemy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hovet Jr., Thomas. 1964. The role of Africa in the United Nations. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 354 n. 1: 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626435400114.
Johnson, Steve. 2004. The Tchumo Tchato project in Mozambique: community-based natural resource management in transition. In Rights, resources and rural development: community-based natural resource management in Southern Africa, editado por Christo Fabricius, Eddie Koch, Stephen Turner e Hector Magome, 210-222. London: Earthscan.
Leff, Enrique. 2006. Racionalidade ambiental: a reapropriação social da natureza. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Meneses, Maria. P. G. 1999. A natureza, a biodiversidade e o conhecimento local: qual o papel dos cientistas sociais? Estudos Moçambicanos 17: 257-276.
Mondlane, Eduardo. 1995. Lutar por Moçambique. Maputo: Centro de Estudos Africanos.
Monteiro, Armindo. 1939. Portugal in Africa. Journal of the Royal African Society 38 (151): 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a101200.
Moreira, Adriano. 1961. Política de integração. Lisboa: Bertrand.
Moreira, Adriano. 1956. Política ultramarina. Lisboa: Junta de Investigação do Ultramar.
Nayyar, Deepak. 2013. A corrida pelo crescimento: países em desenvolvimento na economia global. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
Nyerere, Julius. 1968. Ujamaa: essays on socialism. Dar-Es-Salam: Oxford University Press.
Vossole, J. V. 2013. A crise de legitimidade da governança climática global: combinação de uma perspectiva marxista e polanyiana. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 100: 153-176. https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.5275.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).