Léxico geopolítico e ordem no Leste Asiático
da Ásia-Pacífico ao Indo-Pacífico?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2025.1.47327Palavras-chave:
Indo-Pacífico, Ásia-Pacífico, Leste Asiático, Ordem regional, GovernançaResumo
O processo de reordenamento de poder global apresenta efeitos distintos sobre o Leste Asiático, com a emergência de um novo quadro referencial geopolítico, expresso no termo Indo-Pacífico, que busca suplantar o tradicionalmente concebido Ásia-Pacífico. A pesquisa, de vertente qualitativa e tipo exploratório-analítico, apresenta as origens estruturais da nova visão para a ordem regional, analisando as suas limitações diante do histórico imperativo econômico-securitário do Leste Asiático. Conclui-se que a reconceituação no Indo-Pacífico, que responde à reorganização do cenário regional, promovida por Beijing, continua frágil, pois não se alinha aos fundamentos sociais que caracterizam as Relações Internacionais do Leste Asiático.
Downloads
Referências
Arrighi, Giovanni. 1996. A ascensão do Leste Asiático e a desarticulação do sistema político mundial. Tempo 1 (2): 99-131.
Arrighi, Giovanni. 2008. Adam Smith in Beijing: lineages of the 21st century. Verso Books.
Baru, Sanjaya. 2012. Geo-economics and strategy. Survival: global politics and strategy 54 (3): 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2012.690978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2012.690978
Beeson, Mark e Troy Lee-Brown. 2021. Regionalism for realists? The evolution of the Indo-Pacific. Chinese Political Science Review 6 (2): 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00163-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00163-0
Clegg, Jenny. 2009. China’s global strategy: towards a multipolar world. Pluto Press.
Davidson, William e Joseph V. Montville. 1981. Foreign policy according to Freud. Foreign Policy 45: 145-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1148317
Demir, Emre. 2020. Competing regional visions: China’s belt and road Initiative versus the Indo-Pacific partnership. In Conflict and cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, organizado por Ash Rossiter e Brendon Cannon. Routledge.
Foot, Rosemary e Evelyn Goh. 2019. The International Relations of East Asia: a new research prospectus. International Studies Review 21 (3): 398-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy015
Goh, Evelyn. 2013. The struggle for order: hegemony, hierarchy, and transition in post-cold war East Asia. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599363.001.0001
Goh, Evelyn. 2019. Contesting hegemonic order: China in East Asia. Security Studies 28 (3): 614-644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2019.1604989
Heiduk, Felix e Gudrun Wacker. 2020. From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: significance, implementation and challenges. SWP Research Paper (9):1-44. https://doi.org/10.18449/2020RP09.
Huaigao, Qi e Li Kaisheng. 2020. The shifting power structure of northeast Asia and China’s strategic choices in the 2020s. Journal of International Analytics 11 (2): 45-67. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-2-45-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-2-45-67
Kang, David C. 2007. China rising: peace, power and order in East Asia. Columbia University Press.
Kang, David C. 2013. Getting Asia wrong: the need for new analytical frameworks. International Security 27 (4): 57-85. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/016228803321951090
Kang, David Chan-oong e Xinru Ma. 2018. Power Transitions: Thucydides didn’t live in East Asia. The Washington Quarterly 41 (1): 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1445905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2018.1445905
Köllner, Patrick, Robert Patman e Balazs Kiglics. 2022. From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: diplomacy in a contested region. In From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: diplomacy in a contested region, organizado por Patrick Köllner, Robert Patman e Balazs Kiglics. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7007-7_1
Lewis, Martin e Kären Wigen. 1997. The myth of continents: a critique of metageography. University of California Press.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2019. Bound to fail: the rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security 43 (4): 7-50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
Medeiros, Leonardo Bacher e Luana Margarete Geiger. 2016. China na Organização Mundial de Comércio: Revisionismo ou status quo? Século 21: Revista de Relações Internacionais 7 (1): 47-60.
Pautasso, Diego e Marco Cepik. 2021. Indo-Pacífico: entre a estratégia estadunidense e a resposta chinesa. Pensamiento Propio 54: 45-69.
Rossiter, Ash e Brendon Cannon. 2020. Conflict and cooperation in the Indo-Pacific: new geopolitical realities. In Conflict and Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, editado por Rossiter, Ash e Cannon, Brendon. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009269
Scott, David. 2018. The Indo-Pacific in US strategy: responding to power shifts. Rising Powers Quarterly 2 (2): 19-43.
Van Langenhove, Luk. 2013. What is a region? Towards a statehood theory of regions. Contemporary Politics 19 (4): 474-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.853392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.853392
Visentini, Paulo F. 2014. A Ásia no sistema internacional e a China como pivô. Conjuntura Internacional 11 (1): 83-91.
Visentini, Paulo F. 2015. O caótico século 21. Alta Books.
Wirth, Christian e Nicole Jenne. 2022. Filling the void: the Asia-Pacific problem of order and emerging Indo- -Pacific regional multilateralism. Contemporary Security Policy 43 (2): 213-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2036506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2036506
Zhang, Yongjin. 1991. China in the international system 1918–20: the Middle Kingdom at the Periphery. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21238-5
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.