O “sujeito científico” no sistema filosófico de A. Badiou: o caso da biolinguística chomskyana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2016.3.26228Palabras clave:
ontologia, subjetividade, genericidade, biolinguística, Chomsky, identidade.Resumen
Neste artigo argumenta-se que o programa biolinguístico de Noam Chomsky contém uma ontologia subjacente cuja implicação diz respeito a uma transformação radical da noção de sujeito e da categoria de identidade que lhe sustenta, assim como da noção kuhniana de ciência normal. De fato, um dos desafios de uma ontologia estruturalista da qual Chomsky é pessoalmente distante, mas formalmente próximo, é de transpor as teses sobre o real da questão do ser e do acontecimento para um realismo, campo que proporciona as condições de criação de um sujeito diferencial e genérico pela geração de estruturas sintáticas elementares projetadas em séries de palavras. Desta forma, a capacidade linguística auxilia na produção e na criação da identidade. Argumenta-se que o programa biolinguístico é ainda revolucionário no sentido em que despertou e perpetuou uma nova figura subjetiva da ciência, isto é, uma figura emancipadora do sujeito pensado pela ciência em relação à qual uma ontologia fundamental só pode se adequar na base da multiplicidade, tal como tem feito Alain Badiou.
Descargas
Citas
ANTONY, L. B.; HORNSTEIN, N. Chomsky and his Critics. New York: Routledge, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690024
ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. Org. G. Reale. Trad. M. Perini. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.
BADIOU, A. L’Être et l’événement. Paris: Éd. du Seuil, 1988.
______. Manifeste pour la philosophie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1989.
______. "Y a-t-il une théorie du sujet chez Canguilhem”. In: L’Aventure de la philosophie française: depuis les années 1960. Paris: La Fabrique, 2012.
BERWICK, R.; CHOMSKY, N. “Foreword”. In: BOLHUIS, J.; EVERAERT, M. Birdsong, Speech and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2013. pp. ix-xii.
______. Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2016.
BERWICK, R.; CHOMSKY, N.; PIATTELLI-PALMARINI, M. “Poverty of the stimulus Stands: Why recent Challenges Fail”. In: PIATTELLI-PALMARINI, M.; BERWICK, R. (eds.). Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. London: Oxford University Press, 2015. p. 19-42.
BOECKX, Cedric. “Some Reflections on Darwin’s Problem in the Context of Cartesian Biolinguistics”. In: BOECKX, C.; SCULLY, A.-M. The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. London: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 42-64.
BOECKX, C. “Some Thoughts on Biolinguistics”. In: Veritas, 60, 2 (2015), p. 207-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2015.2.22006
BOECKX, C.; SCULLY, A.-M. (eds.). The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. London: Oxford University Press, 2011.
CANGUILHEM, G. Le concept et la vie. In: Revue Philosophique de Louvain, troisième série, 64, 82 (1966), p. 193-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/phlou.1966.5347
______. Études d’histoire et de philosophie de la science. Paris: Librairie J. Vrin, 1968.
______. Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings from Georges Canguilhem. Edited by François Delaporte and translated by Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Zone Books, 1994.
CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957. (2nd ed., 2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009
______. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988.
______. The Minimalist Project. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995.
______. Perspectives on Power. Reflections on Human Nature and the Social Order. Montréal: Black Rose Books, 1997.
______. “The Mysteries of Natures”. The Journal of Philosophy, CVI, 4 (Apr. 2009), p. 167-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2009106416
______. “Three Factors in Language Design”. In: Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1 (Winter, 2005), p. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655
______. Sobre natureza e linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
______. The Science of Language. Interviews with James MacGilvray. Edited by N. Chomsky and J. MacGilvray. London: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
______. “What Kind of Creatures are We?: i. What is Language? ii. What Can we Understand? iii. What is Common Good?” In: The Journal of Philosophy, CX, 12 (Dec. 2013), p. 645-700.
CHOMSKY, N.; BERWICK, R. “The Biolinguistic Program: The Current State of its Development”. In: The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. Edited by Anna Maria di Sciullo and Cedric Boeckx. London: Oxford University Press, 2011.
CHOMSKY, N.; HAUSER, M.; FITCH, T. W. Appendix. The Minimalist Program. Supplement (online) to Fitch, Hauser and Chomsky’s (2005) reply to Jackendoff and Pinker. (2004).
DEHAENE, S. La bosse des maths. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2010.
______. Le Code de la conscience. Paris: Odile Jacob/Sciences, 2014.
DE LANDA, M. A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. New York: Swerve Books, 2000.
FITCH, W. T.; HAUSER, M.; CHOMSKY, N. “The Evolution of the Language Faculty: Clarifications and Implications”, In: Cognition, 97 (2005), p. 179-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.005
FOUCAULT, M. Les Mots et les Choses. Une arquéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.
______. L’ Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.
FREGE, G. Les fondements de l’arithmétique. Trad. par C. Imbert. Paris: Le Seuil/L’ordre philosophique, 1969.
______. (1919). Recherches logiques: La Pensée. In: Écrits logiques et philosophiques. Trad. Claude Imbert. Paris: Points/Essais, 1971.
HALLWARD P.; PENDEN, K. (ed.). Concept and Form. 2 v. New York: Verso, 2012.
HAUSER, M.; CHOMSKY, N.; FITCH, T. “The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did it Evolve?”. Science, 298, issue 5598 (2002), p. 1569-1579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
JACKENDOFF, R. Foundations of Language. Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. London: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
______. A User’s Guide to Thought and Meaning. London: Oxford University Press, 2012.
KUHN, T. The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
LASNIK, Howard (with Marcela Depiante and Arthur Stepanov). Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6592.001.0001
LENNEBERG, Eric H. Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
MAMPE, Birgit; FRIEDERICI, Angela D.; WERMKE, Anne Christophe; WERMKE, Kristine. Newborns’ cry melody is shaped by their native language. Current Biology, 19, 23 (2009), p. 1994-1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.064
PÄÄBO, S. Neanderthal Man: In Search of Lost Genome. New York: Basic Books, 2014.
PETITTO, Laura Anne. “How the brain begets language”. In: The Chomsky Reader. Ed. James McGilvray. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. p. 85-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521780136.005
PIATTELLI-PALMARINI, M.; URIAGEREKA, J. “A Geneticist’s Dream, a Linguist’s Nightmare: The Case of FOXP2”. In: BOECKX, C.; SCULLY, A.-M. The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. London: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 100-125.
PINKER, S.; JACKENDORFF, R. “The Faculty of Language: What’s Special about it?”. In: Cognition, 95 (2005), p. 201-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004
PUTNAM, H. The Many Faces of Realism. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court Press, 1987.
RORTY, R. Philosophy and the Mirror of Natures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979.
TAYLOR, C, The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674970250
VAN FRASSEN, B. “The Transcendence of the Ego: the non-Existent Knight”. In: Ratio (new series), XVII, 4 (Dec. 2004), p. 453-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00265.x
______. “Structuralism(s) About Science: Some Common Problems”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, LXXXI (2007), p. 45-61.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Revista Veritas implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Revista Veritas como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS
