Philosophy of law and legal theory in Habermas: reconstructive implications for a theory of society

Authors

  • Marcio Renan Hamel UPF
  • Gilvan Luiz Hansen UPF

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2011.3.9815

Keywords:

Philosophy of Law. Sociology of Law. Legal Theory. Theory of Society.

Abstract

This text examines the distinction and relation between legal philosophy and legal theory in the book Law and Democracy by Jürgen Habermas. To that end, I seek at first to reflect on the concepts of law sociology and philosophy of justice from the dialogue that opposes Habermas to Dworkin and Rawls, on the philosophical basis of equality and distribution. Subsequently, we analyse the arguments about the social integrative function of law that Habermas develops from the works of Parsons and Weber, in order to see what Habermas meant by integrative function of law as well as the contribution of that category for a reconstructive theory of the society. The conclusion points to the link between his philosophy of right to a sociological theory, when, through the concept of communicative reason, he eschews metaphysical discussions of the absolute and seeks to develop a concept of society capable of resisting the dimensions of the life world and system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcio Renan Hamel, UPF

Professor da Faculdade de Direito da UPF, em Teoria do Direito, Hermenêutica e Argumentçaão Jurídica. Ética Geral e Profissional. Doutorando em Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais pela UFF/RJ.

Gilvan Luiz Hansen, UPF

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ, Mestre em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – PUCRS, Graduado em Filosofia pela UPF, Professor da Faculdade de Direito da UFF e do Programa de Pós-Graduação stricto sensu em Sociologia e Direito da UFF.

Published

2011-12-30

How to Cite

Hamel, M. R., & Hansen, G. L. (2011). Philosophy of law and legal theory in Habermas: reconstructive implications for a theory of society. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 56(3). https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2011.3.9815