Amartya Sen's Rational Fools

a commented translation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2025.1.46767

Keywords:

Rational Choice, Behaviour, Sympathy, Empathy, Behavioral economics

Abstract

This article presents a commented translation of Amartya Sen's seminal work, "RATIONAL FOOLS: A CRITIQUE OF THE BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMIC THEORY" (1977), translated into Portuguese as "OTÁRIOS RACIONAIS: UMA CRÍTICA DOS FUNDAMENTOS COMPORTAMENTAIS DA TEORIA ECONÔMICA". Sen's work is described as a manifesto that challenges the concept of the  homo economicus—an agent motivated solely by self-interest—and critiques the foundations of dominant economic theory. The article's introduction contextualizes Sen's revolutionary impact, exploring his critique of preference theory, his questioning of methodological egocentrism, and his deconstruction of the problem of transitivity. The text also discusses the translation choices made, with an emphasis on the selection of "otários racionais" for the title, which, according to the translators, better represents Sen's satire on the limited description of the rational actor in classical economic theory. The choice of the term "otário" is justified as describing a person who is deliberately unpleasant and calculating, as opposed to terms like "tolo" or "bobo," which suggest naïveté or an unthinking behavior. Another crucial translation decision was the differentiation between "simpatia" (sympathy) and "compromisso" (commitment), which are central concepts in Sen's critique. The translators chose "comprometimento" to capture the idea of an individual acting out of a sense of social responsibility rather than a formal obligation, often influenced by the fear of social retaliation. The article argues that Sen's view leads to a richer and more human conception of rationality, reintegrating ethics, context, and psychology into economic and political analysis.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fabricio Pontin, La Salle University, Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Doctor of Philosophy (Southern Illinois University, 2013), Professor in the Graduate Program in Education and the Graduate Program in Law at LaSalle University.

Rafaela Lemos da Silva, La Salle University, Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Bachelor's degree in International Relations (LaSalle University, 2023).

References

ARROW, Kenneth. Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission for Economics Research, 1951.

ARROW, Kenneth; HAHN, Frank. General Competitive Analysis. São Francisco: Holden-Day, 1971.

EDGEWORTH, Francis. Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. Londres, C. Kegan Paul and Co., 1881.

NAGEL, Thomas. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton University Press, p. 81, 1970.

SAMUELSON, Paul. The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory. Economica, New Series, Vol. 17, No. 68, p. 355-385, nov. 1950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2549499

SEN, Amartya. Maximization and The Act of Choice. Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 4, p. 745-779, jul. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2171939

SEN, Amartya. Behavior and The Concept of Preference. Economica, New Series, Vol. 40, No. 159, p. 241-259, ago. 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2552796

SEN, Amartya. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 317-344, 1977.

Published

2025-11-13

How to Cite

Pontin, F., & Lemos da Silva, R. (2025). Amartya Sen’s Rational Fools: a commented translation. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 70(1), e46767. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2025.1.46767

Issue

Section

Translation