Amartya Sen's Rational Fools
a commented translation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2025.1.46767Keywords:
Rational Choice, Behaviour, Sympathy, Empathy, Behavioral economicsAbstract
This article presents a commented translation of Amartya Sen's seminal work, "RATIONAL FOOLS: A CRITIQUE OF THE BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATIONS OF ECONOMIC THEORY" (1977), translated into Portuguese as "OTÁRIOS RACIONAIS: UMA CRÍTICA DOS FUNDAMENTOS COMPORTAMENTAIS DA TEORIA ECONÔMICA". Sen's work is described as a manifesto that challenges the concept of the homo economicus—an agent motivated solely by self-interest—and critiques the foundations of dominant economic theory. The article's introduction contextualizes Sen's revolutionary impact, exploring his critique of preference theory, his questioning of methodological egocentrism, and his deconstruction of the problem of transitivity. The text also discusses the translation choices made, with an emphasis on the selection of "otários racionais" for the title, which, according to the translators, better represents Sen's satire on the limited description of the rational actor in classical economic theory. The choice of the term "otário" is justified as describing a person who is deliberately unpleasant and calculating, as opposed to terms like "tolo" or "bobo," which suggest naïveté or an unthinking behavior. Another crucial translation decision was the differentiation between "simpatia" (sympathy) and "compromisso" (commitment), which are central concepts in Sen's critique. The translators chose "comprometimento" to capture the idea of an individual acting out of a sense of social responsibility rather than a formal obligation, often influenced by the fear of social retaliation. The article argues that Sen's view leads to a richer and more human conception of rationality, reintegrating ethics, context, and psychology into economic and political analysis.
Downloads
References
ARROW, Kenneth. Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Commission for Economics Research, 1951.
ARROW, Kenneth; HAHN, Frank. General Competitive Analysis. São Francisco: Holden-Day, 1971.
EDGEWORTH, Francis. Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences. Londres, C. Kegan Paul and Co., 1881.
NAGEL, Thomas. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton University Press, p. 81, 1970.
SAMUELSON, Paul. The Problem of Integrability in Utility Theory. Economica, New Series, Vol. 17, No. 68, p. 355-385, nov. 1950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2549499
SEN, Amartya. Maximization and The Act of Choice. Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 4, p. 745-779, jul. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2171939
SEN, Amartya. Behavior and The Concept of Preference. Economica, New Series, Vol. 40, No. 159, p. 241-259, ago. 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2552796
SEN, Amartya. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 317-344, 1977.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Veritas (Porto Alegre)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





