The three-dimensional structure of contemporary virtue ethics

An analysis based on Alasdair MacIntyre

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.45457

Keywords:

Human Animality, Virtues of Independence, Virtues of Acknowledged Dependence, Virtues of Shared Responsibility

Abstract

Alasdair MacIntyre elaborates his proposal for ethics of virtues anchored in recognition of the animal identity of the human being, together with the vulnerability and dependence to which we are subjected as biologically constituted animals, but without relating it to the environmental issues arising from our animal condition. Thus, we intend to expand MacIntyre’s virtue ethics through the interweaving of his concepts of human animality, flourishing and virtues, which expose a type of relationship between the human being and nature that requires an entirely new and different set of virtues than those until then thematized by him: the virtues of shared responsibility.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Elielton de Sousa, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI),Teresina, PI, Piauí.

PhD in Philosophy (2016) from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Master in Philosophy (2010) and Graduate in Philosophy (2007) from the Federal University of Piauí (UFPI). Adjunct Professor at the Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), working in the Undergraduate Program in Philosophy and in the Graduate Program in Philosophy (PPGFIL). He has experience and interest in Contemporary Philosophy, with an emphasis on Ethics, working mainly on the following authors and themes: Friedrich Nietzsche, Alasdair MacIntyre, Critique of Modernity, Nihilism, Virtue Ethics, Vitalism, Philosophy and Education, Brazilian Philosophical Thought.

References

ARENDT, Hannah. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. London, UK: Penguin Books, 2006.

ARENDT, Hannah. Responsability and Judgment. New York: Schocken, 2009.

ARISTOTLE. Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

CARVALHO, Helder B. A. Nota bibliográfica: A antropologia dos animais racionais dependentes. Pensando, v. 1, p. 106-154, 2010.

CARVALHO, Helder B. A. Tradição e Racionalidade na Filosofia de Alasdair MacIntyre. 2ª ed. Teresina, PI: EDUFPI, 2011.

DÍAZ, Francisco J. T. Alasdair MacIntyre um crítico del liberalismo? Creencias y virtudes entre las fracturas de la modernidade. Madrid: Dykinson, 2005.

FAO. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO) AND THE WORLD WATER COUNCIL (WCC): Towards a water and food secure future: Critical perspectives for policy-makers. Rome And Marseille: FAO, 2015. Available in http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/world_water_council/documents/publications/forum_documents/FAO_WWC_Water_and_Food_WhitePaper.pdf Accessed on Oct. 1 2023.

FULLER, M. Making sense of MacIntyre. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.

GÓMES-HERAS, J. M. García (Coord.). La dignidad de la natureza: ensayos sobre ética y filosofía del Medio Ambiente. Granada: Editorial COMARES, 2000.

IZQUIERDO, David. L. Comunitarismo contra individualismo: una revisión de los valores Occidente desde el pensamiento de Alasdair MacIntyre. Cizur Menor: Editorial Aranzadi, 2007.

JONAS, Hans. The Imperative of Responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984.

KNIGHT, Kelvin. Practices: The Aristotelian Concept. Analyse & Kritik, v. 30, p. 317-329, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2008-0118

KRIEGER, Martin. H. What’s wrong with Plastic Trees? Science, v. 179, p. 446-453, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.179.4072.446

LEOPOLD, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac: With Essays on Conservation from Round River. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1966.

LOVELOCK, James. Gaia: a new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.

MACINTYRE, Alasdair. C. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.

MACINTYRE, Alasdair. C. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company, 1999.

MACINTYRE, Alasdair. C. After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd ed. London: Duckworth, 2007.

NICHOLAS, Jeffery. L. Mitakuye Oyasun as a Foundation for the well-being of animal life: reason, nature and oppression in Horkheimer, MacIntyre and Midgley. Pensando, v. 6, n. 11, p. 31-48, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26694/pensando.v6i11.3335

PEIXOTO, Miriam C. Diniz. A emergência da reflexão sobre a responsabilidade moral na Grécia antiga: Homero e Demócrito. Síntese, v. 29, n. 95, p. 301-322, 2002.

PLATO. Republic. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Kackett Pub Co. Inc., 1992.

POPE FRANCIS. Encyclical Letter Laudato Si – Of the Holy Father. Vatican: Vatican Press, 2015.

SANDLER, Ronald. Character and Environment: A Virtue-Oriented Approach to Environmental Ethics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.

SOUSA, José Elielton de. As virtudes da responsabilidade compartilhada: uma ampliação da teoria das virtudes de Alasdair MacIntyre. Curitiba: CRV, 2017.

TAYLON, Paul W. A theory of environmental ethics. 25th Anniversary Edition. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2011.

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION (UNESCO). The Earth Charter. Paris: UNESCO, 2000. Available in http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/invent/images/uploads/echarter_portuguese.pdf Accessed on Oct. 1 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-23

How to Cite

de Sousa, J. E. (2024). The three-dimensional structure of contemporary virtue ethics: An analysis based on Alasdair MacIntyre. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 69(1), e45457. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.45457

Issue

Section

Ethics and Political Philosophy