Avicenna and the problem of the subject-matter of metaphysics

the hypothesis of the causes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2023.1.44458

Keywords:

Aristotle, Arabic philosophy, Metaphysics, Aitiology.

Abstract

An issue the readers of Aristotle’s Metaphysics must deal with is the delimitation of the subject-matter of the wisdom. An attempt to answer this problem was proposed by Avicenna (10th Century) in his metaphysical treatise On Divine Things (Ilāhiyyāt). In its first book, the philosopher investigates each one of the three candidates for the position of the subject-matter of this science (i.e., God, causes, and being). Having in mind the difficulties of this topic, the following analysis is limited to the second hypothesis, namely, if the first philosophy is the science of the causes (an aitiology). I will start contextualizing the Ilāh. I since it precedes the analysis of the hypothesis of the causes. Then, I will discuss the hypothesis of the causes and show Avicenna’s arguments against it. Finally, I will conclude this investigation discussing briefly the relation between causes and being in view of Avicenna’s ontological answer to the main problem and the problems emerging from it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Meline Sousa, Professora da Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brasil.

Graduated in Philosophy from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (2011), a Master's degree in Philosophy from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (2013) and a PhD in Philosophy from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (2016). She is currently a professor at the Federal University of Lavras. He has experience in the area of ​​Philosophy, with an emphasis on Medieval Philosophy. Member of the Société Internationale pour l’Étude de la Philosophie Médiévale, the GT on the History of Philosophy of Nature and the Research Group on Metaphysics and Politics. She is coordinator of the Center for Studies in Arab Philosophy (UFLA).

References

AL-BADAWĪ, A. R. Al-Aflaṭūnīyah al-Muḥdathah ʿindā al-ʿArab. Cairo: [s.n.], 1977 [1955].

AL-FARABI. Book of Letters (Kitab al-huruf): commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Arabic Text, Edited with Introduction and Notes by M. Mahdi. Beirut: Dar el-Mashreq, 1970. p. 110-128.

AL-FARABI. Maqala fI aghrad ma ba’d al-thabi’a. Dairat al-ma’arif al-‘Uthmaniyyat. Hyderabad: [s.n.], 1930.

ARAÚJO, D. A. O estabelecimento da Metafísica como ciência filosófica no Liber de Philosophia Prima sive Scientia Divina, de Avicena. 2015. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2015.

ARISTOTLE. Posterior Analytics. Translated with a Commentary by J. Barnes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993 [1975].

AVICENNA. Libro della guarigione. Le cose divine. A cura di Amos Bertolacci. Torino: UTET, 2008.

AVICENNA. Metafisica. Trad. dall’arabo, introduzioni, note e apparato di Olga Lizzini e Pasquale Porro. Milano: Bompiani, 2002.

AVICENA. Metafísica do Livro da cura (Kitab al-shifa). Trad. T. M. Verza. Revista Reflexões, Fortaleza, ano 8, n. 14, p. 233-250, 2019.

AVICENNA. The Metaphysics of The Healing. A Parallel English-Arabic Text. Translated, Introduced, and Annoted by Michael E. Marmura. Provo: Brighan Young University Press, 2005. 60

BERTOLACCI, A. God’s Existence and Essence: The Liber de causis and School Discussions in the Metaphysics of Avicenna. In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022. v. 3, p. 251-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501331_012

BERTOLACCI, A. The Reception of Aristotle’s Metaphysics in Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Šifā’: a Milestone of Western Metaphysical Thought. Leiden: Brill, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047408710

DODGE, B. (ed.). The Fihrist of al-Nadim. A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1970. v. II.

GUERRERO, R. R. Avicena. Madrid: Ediciones del Orto, 1994.

GUTAS, D. Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition. Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Second, Revised and Enlarged Edition, Including an Inventory of Avicenna’s Authentic Works. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004262072

GUTAS, D. Greek Thought, Arabic Culture. The Graeco-Arabi Translation Movement in Baghdad and Early ‘Abbasid Society (2nd-4th/8th -10th centuries). London: Routledge, 1998.

IBN AL-NADIM. Kitāb al-fihrist. Editado e traduzido por Muḥammad Riḍā Taǧaddud. Tehran: Chāpkhānehyi Bānk-i Bāzargānī-yi, 1971.

IBN SINA. Al-Shifāʾ [Healing]: Al-Ilāhiyyāt [Metaphysics]. Edited by Georges C. Anawati, et al. 2 vols. Cairo: Al-Hayʾa al-ʿAmma li-Shuʾun al-Mutabiʿ al-Amiriya, 1960.

KIANKHAH, L. Análise e edição crítica de “Os objetivos da Metafísica”. Sophia Perennis, Tehran, v. 11, n. 26, p. 119-157, 1993 [2014 EC] [em persa e árabe].

LIZZINI, O. L. Causalité et pouvoir: autour des traces du Liber de causis dans la Métaphysique d’Avicenne. In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022. v. 3, p. 217-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501331_011

MARMURA, M. Avicenna on the division of the sciences in the Isagoge of his Shifa. Journal for the history of Arabic science, Aleppo, n. 4, p. 239-251, 1980.

MENN, S. Al-Fārābī’s Kitāb al-Ḥurūf and His Analysis of the Senses of Being. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, Cambridge, v. 18, p. 59-97, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423908000477

MENN, S. Avicenna’s Metaphysics. In: ADAMSON, P. (ed.). Interpreting Avicenna. Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. p. 143-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047890.009

PEREIRA, R. H. S. Busca do conhecimento. Ensaios de Filosofia Medieval no Islã. São Paulo: Paulus, 2007.

RAMÓN, R. Al-Farabi: el concepto del ser. Revista de Filosofía, Madrid, v. 7, n. 11, p. 27-49, 1994.

TAYLOR, R. C. Contextualizing the Kalām f ī maḥḍ al-khair / Liber de causis. In: CALMA, D. (ed.). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2020. v. 2, p. 211-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440685_011

TAYLOR, R. C. The Liber de Causis (Kalām f ī Maḥḍ al-Khair). A Study of Medieval Neoplatonism. 1981. Thesis (Degree of Doctor of Philosophy) – University of Toronto, Toronto, 1981.

VASILIU, A. Regards croisés sur la cause première: Plotin, Porphyre, Victorinus, Saloustios, Proclus. In: CALMA, D. (ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022. v. 3, p. 60-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501331_005

VERZA, T. M. “Do agente deriva apenas a existência”: Avicena e a concepção comum de causa eficiente na Metafísica VI.1. Analytica, Rio de Janeiro, v. 14, n. 2, p. 27-43, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35920/arf.v14i2.596

Downloads

Published

2023-11-13

How to Cite

Sousa, M. (2023). Avicenna and the problem of the subject-matter of metaphysics: the hypothesis of the causes. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 68(1), e44458. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2023.1.44458

Issue

Vol. 68 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume

Section

Varia

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Veritas (Porto Alegre)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.


Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p