The semantic underdetermination of metaphor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34859Keywords:
Metaphor. Semantic underdetermination. Linguistic code. Minimalism. Contextualism.Abstract
This work intends to sustain that the best concept to deal with the relationship between metaphor and language is the one of semantic underdetermination. However the most common way of dealing with the phenomenon of metaphors relegates to pragmatic (not to semantics as expected) the function of explaining how the metaphorical meaning of a phrase is a context-generated entailment. According to this picture, metaphors would be indeterminate semantically because pragmatic entailments are virtually infinite and do not need to refer to the semantically expressed proposition. We argue, however, that the best alternatives to handle with matter come from the debate between contextualism and semantic minimalism. Metaphors would be cases
of semantic flexibility also present in other linguistic phenomena. For minimalism, metaphors can be addressed through the introduction of a lexical operator that would guarantee the necessary contextual flexibility to contextually dependent semantic terms. For contextualism, metaphors occur when terms within a phrase function as ad hoc concepts and are amenable to pragmatic enrichments. Although they do not reach a single solution, the debate between minimalism and contextualism offers
explanations of the phenomenon that corroborate the hypothesis of the semantic underdetermination presented in this work.
Downloads
References
ARISTÓTELES. Poética. Tradução de Eudoro de Souza. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1984.
BEZUIDENHOUT, A. Metaphor and what is said: A defense of a direct expression view of metaphor. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25, p. 156-186, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4975.00044
BLACK, M. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501741326
BORG, E. Minimal semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199270252.001.0001
CAPPELEN, H. LEPORE, E. Insensitive semantics: a defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755792
EZCURDIA, M. STAINTON, R. J. The semantics-pragmatics boundary in philosophy. Peterborough: Broadview press, 2013.
GRICE, H. P. Logic and conversation. In. ____ The semantics-pragmatics boundary in philosophy. Peterborough: Broadview press, 2013, p. 47-59.
KAPLAN, D. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: ALMOG, J.; PERRY, J.; WETTSTEIN, H. (Ed.). Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 1989. p. 481-563.
LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 1980.
LEVINSON, S. Pragmática. Tradução Luiz Carlos Borges e Aníbal Mari. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
LEVINSON, S. Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
LEWIS, D. General Semantics, Synthese, 22(1–2): 18–67, 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413598
PERINI-SANTOS, E. Contextualismo. Compêndio em linha de problemas de filosofia analítica. p. 1-28, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51427/cfi.2021.0016
PERRY, J. The problem of essential indexical and other essays. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2000.
RECANATI, F. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226993.001.0001
REIMER, M. The direct expression of metaphorical content. In. STAINTON R. J. VIGER, C. (eds.). Compositionality, context and semantic values, Springer Science+Business Media B.V, p. 237-253, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8310-5_10
SEARLE, J. Metaphor. In: Ortony, A. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
SPERBER, D. & WILSON, D. Relevance: communication and cognition. 2. ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
STERN, J. Metaphor and minimalism. Springer, Science+business Media B.V, p. 273-298, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9486-3
STERN, J. Metaphor in Context. Cambridge, The MIT Press, 2000.
WEARING, C. Metaphor and what is said. In. EZCURDIA, M. STAINTON, R. J. The semantics-pragmatics boundary in philosophy. Peterborough: Broadview press, 2013, p. 492-510.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p