MÖGLICHKEIT UND NOTWENDIGKEIT DER EXISTENZ GOTTES: ANSELMS ONTOLOGISCHER GOTTESBEWEIS IN DER MODALLOGISCHEN DEUTUNG VON CHARLES HARTSHORNE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2003.3.34809Keywords:
O argumento de Anselmo. Existência de Deus. Argumentos ontológicos a favor da existência de Deus. À versão de Charles Hartshome do argumento ontológico. Argumento lógico-modal.Abstract
O autor analisa a validade de uma certa variante do “argumento ontológico" de
Anselmo, a saber, a versão lógico-modal de Charles Hartshorne (1897-2000). Ele investiga, primeiramente, a origem dos argumentos de Hartshorne, partindo de uma interpretação de Anselmo; em segundo lugar, o argumento lógico-modal é apresentado, junto com as suas pressuposições e implicações. Finalmente, o autor propõe uma avaliação da abordagem de Hartshorne.
Downloads
References
ADAMS, R.M. The logical structure of Anselm's arguments. In: 7he Philosophica! Review, v. 80, p. 28-54, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2184310
ANSELM VON CANTERBURY. Zrosiogion (lat.-dt.), Stuttgart: ES. Schmitt ed., 1984.
BEDELL, G. The many faces of necessity in the many-faced argument. In: The New Scholasticism, v. 53, p. 1-21, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas197953141
BRECHER, R.: Hartshornes modaler Gottesbeweis. In: Ratio, v. 17, p. 134-140, 1975.
BUCHER, Th.G. Zur Entwicklung des Ontologischen Beweises nach 1960. In: MÓLLER, J. (Hg.). Der Streit um den Gott der Philosophen. Dusseldorf, 1985. p. 109-134.
. Einfúbrung in die angewandte Logik (Sammlung Góschen, 2231). Berlin-New York, 1987.
CLAYTON, J. Art. , Hartshorne, Charles“. In: Theologische Realenzykiopâdie, v. 14, 464-469, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867961-092
COBB, J.B. ,Perfection exists": a critique of Charles Hartshorne. In: eligion and' Life, v. 32, p. 294-304, 1962/63.
FINDLAY, J.N. Can God's existence be disproved? In: Mind, v. 57, p. 176-183, 1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LVII.226.176
GRIM, P Plantinga, Hartshorne, and the ontological argument. In: Sopa, v. 20, p. 12-16, 1981, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789922
HARTSHORNE, Ch. Man's vision of God and the logic of theism. Chicago, 1941.
- The formal validity and real significance of the ontological argument. In:
Phulosophical Review, v. 53, p. 225-245, 1944, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2182097
. Professor Hartshorne's syllogism: rejoinder. In: Philosophica! Review, v. 54, p. 506-508, 1945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2181297
. The logic of the ontological argument. In: 7he Journal of Philosophy, v. 58, p. 471-473, 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2023023
, The Logic of Perfection. La Salle, 1962.
. Anselm's Discovery. A re-examination of the ontological proof for God's existence. La Salle, 1965.
. Is the denial of existence ever contradictory? In: The Journal of Philosophy, v. 63, p. 85-93, 1966. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2024145
, The dipolar conception of Deity. In: 7he Review of Metaphysics, v. 21, p. 273-289,1967a.
. Necessity. In: 7he Review of Metaphysics, v. 21, p. 290-296, 1967b.
. What did Anselm discover? In: HICK, J.; McGILL, A. (Hgg.). The many-faced argument. Recent studies on the ontological argument for the existence of God. London-Melbourne, 1968a. p. 321-333.
. The irreducibly modal structure of the argument. In: HICK, J.; McGILL, A. (Hgg.).The many-faced argument. Recent studies on the ontological argument for the existence of God. London-Melbourne, 1968D. p. 334-340.
. À reply to my critics: R18. Hubbeling on the ontological argument. In: HAHN, L.E.(Hg.). The philosophy of Charles Hartshorne. La Salle, 1991. p. 664-669.
HARRISON, C. The ontological argument in modal logic. In: 7he Monist, v. 54, p. 302-313, 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197054222
HERRMANN, E. Ze Jogische Stellung des ontologischen Cottesbeweises in Charles Hartshornes Prozesstheologie und necklassischer Metaphysik. Gleerup, 1980.
HICK, J. À critique of the Second Argument". In: ders./McGILL, A. (Hgg.). 7he many-faced argument. Recent studies on the ontological argument for the existence of God. London-Melbourne, 1968. p. 341-356.
Hubbeling, H.G. Hartshorne and the ontological argument. In: HAHN, L.E. (Hg.). The philosophy of Charles Hartshorne. La Salle, 1991. p. 355-376.
HUME, D. Dialogues concerning natural religion., Oxford: J.V. Price ed., 1976.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p
