Vaza-Jato, modernity and the correlation between law and politics: is still law the medium between system and lifeworld?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2020.1.34729Keywords:
Democracy Law. Politics. Impersonal Power. Fascism.Abstract
In this paper, we argue and correlate two points. First, in contemporary political philosophy and in philosophy of right, the axiological-methodological impartiality, impersonality, neutrality and formalism of and by public-political institutions, of and by social systems law and politics, is the only basis that guarantees (a) the anti-fascist, anti-totalitarian and anti-massifying character of institutions law and politics; (b) the separation, autonomy and overposition of social systems right and politics in relation to comprehensive doctrines of world from civil society, as well as the separation, autonomy and overposition of right – as final basis of validation of democracy in general – regarding to politics; (c) the control of fascist perspectives assumed by political-cultural groups raised in civil society; and (d) the foment and effectiveness of basic rights and liberties and of wide, inclusive and participative processes of social criticism, cultural recognition, political struggle and pedagogical praxis of and by different social-political subjects proper to civil society. Now, and that is our second argument, the “Operation Vaza-Jato” has showed to us that “Operation Lava-Jato” broke this fundamental presupposition that guarantees the Rule of Law, by weaken and even eliminating this institutionalist methodological-axiological basis. Thereby, it has correlated politics and moral with and as law, law with and as politics and moral, opening the door for the colonization of law by politics and moral, and, mainly, allowing that politics – now openly and blatantly assuming essentialist and naturalized perspectives as public-political legitimation of these institutions, of these institutionalized subjects and of social life – could instrumentalize law with political purposes. As consequence, no one has fear anymore – in fact people have proud, in current Brazil – to be fascist publicly, both institutionalized subjects and non-institutionalized subjects!Downloads
References
ARENDT, Hannah. Origens do totalitarismo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1989.
BOBBIO, Norbert. O futuro da democracia: uma defesa das regras do jogo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484903e.1985.1.60131
FORST, Rainer. Contextos da justiça: filosofia políticas para além de liberalismo e comunitarismo. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Teoria do agir comunicativo (Vol. I): racionalidade da ação e racionalização social. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012a. https://doi.org/10.11606/t.8.2013.tde-30102013-124407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2013.tde-30102013-124407
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Teoria do agir comunicativo (Vol. II): sobre a crítica da razão funcionalista. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012b.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade (Vol. I). Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2003a.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade (Vol. II). Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2003b.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. A inclusão do outro: estudos de teoria política. São Paulo: Loyola, 2002a.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. O discurso filosófico da modernidade: doze lições. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002b.
HALL, Stuart. A centralidade da cultura: notas sobre as revoluções culturais do nosso tempo. Educação e Realidade, Porto Alegre, v. 22, n. 2, p. 15-46, 1997.
HONNETH, Axel. Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2003.
HONNETH, Axel. Sofrimento de indeterminação: uma reatualização da “Filosofia do Direito” de Hegel. São Paulo: Editora Esfera Pública, 2007a. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v0i11p127-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v0i11p127-140
HONNETH, Axel. Reificación: un estudio en la teoría del reconocimiento. Buenos Aires: Katz, 2007b.
HONNETH, Axel. La educación y el espacio público democrático: un capítulo descuidado en la filosofía política. Isegoría, [S. l.], n. 49, p. 377-395, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2013.049.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2013.049.01
KRENAK, Ailton. Ailton Krenak. Rio de Janeiro: Azougue Editorial, 2017. (Coleção Tembetá).
MBEMBE, Achille. Crítica da razão negra. Lisboa: Antígona, 2014. https://doi.org/10.18223/hiscult.v6i3.2175.s271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18223/hiscult.v6i3.2175.s271
RANCIÈRE, Jacques. O ódio à democracia. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2014.
RAWLS, John. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000a.
RAWLS, John. Justiça e democracia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000b.
RAWLS, John. O liberalismo político. São Paulo: Ática, 2000c.
RAWLS, John. Justiça como equidade: uma reformulação. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
RORTY, Richard. A filosofia e o espelho da natureza. Rio de Janeiro: Relume-Dumará, 1994.
TAYLOR, Charles. Argumentos filosóficos. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2014.
VATTIMO, Gianni. Adeus à verdade. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Veritas (Porto Alegre)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Revista Veritas implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Revista Veritas as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS</p