Merleau-Ponty and the Heritage of the Hegelian Dialectic

Authors

  • Claudinei Aparecido de Freitas da Silva UNIOESTE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2014.2.12248

Keywords:

Merleau-Ponty. Hegel. Dialetic. History. Contingency. Ambiguity.

Abstract

As it gained expression in Hegel’s work, the dialectic went on to have a decisive repercussion in the contemporary debate. An example is its reception in the phenomenological tradition created by Husserl in the work of Sartre and Merleau-Ponty. My purpose here is to make a summary balance of that conceptual heritage in the hands of the latter author. Starting from the Hegelian matrix, situating its range and its limits, this essay seeks to present the Merleau-Pontyan inflection on the notion of the “hyperdialectical”, i.e., “dialectics without synthesis”. What Merleau-Ponty portrays is acknowledgment in the dialectic of a “self-critical” attitude in the sense that it can be neither “being for itself” nor “being itself”. Its “hyper” dimension enormously accentuates a move to “go beyond” and “transcend” all rigid polarity, that is, to deconstruct every positive final synthesis indifferent to the ambiguous meaning of experience and history in the heart of contingency. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Claudinei Aparecido de Freitas da Silva, UNIOESTE

Pós-Doutorado em Filosofia pela Université Paris I - Panthéon/Sorbonne. Professor do Colegiado de Graduação e Mestrado em Filosofia da UNIOESTE.

References

BAVARESCO, A.; COSTA, A. O. “Movimento lógico da figura hegeliana do senhor e do servo”. In: Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, 36, 1 (jan.-abr. 2013), p. 37-60.

BENOIT, A. H. R. “A dialética hegeliana como superação da dialética platônica”. In: Revista Idéias, IFCH-Unicamp, 1 (1995), p. 79-93.

BERGSON, H. La pensée et le mouvant: essais et conférences. Paris: PUF, 1969.

CUEILLE, J-N. “La profondeur du négatif: Merleau-Ponty face à la dialectique de Hegel”. In: Chiasmi International, from nature to ontology, 2 (2000), p. 301-335.

DASTUR, F. “Merleau-Ponty et Hegel: ontologie et dialectique”. In: Chiasmi International, thinking without dualisms today, 11 (2009), p. 33-48.

HEGEL, G.W.F. Nürnberger und Heidelberger Schriften (1808-1817). Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1986, (Werke 4).

______. Wissenschaft der Logik (Bd II). Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1990, (Werke 6).

______. Enciclopédia das ciências filosóficas em compêndio (1830): I – A Ciência da Lógica. Trad. Paulo Menezes. São Paulo: Loyola, 1995.

______. Fenomenologia do espírito. 4. ed. Trad. P. Meneses. Petrópolis (RJ): Vozes, 2007.

______. Filosofia do direito. 2. ed. Trad. Agemir Bavaresco et al. São Paulo/Recife/São Leopoldo: Loyola/Editora UNISINOS/UNICAP, 2010.

HYPPOLITE, J. Figures de la pensée philosophique (T. I e II). Paris: PUF, 1991.

HUSSERL, E. Ideen zu einer reinen phänomenologie und phänomenologischen philosophie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.

KESSELRING, T. “Reconstrução racional da dialética no sentido de Hegel”. In: STEIN, E.; BONI, L. Dialética e liberdade. Petrópolis (RJ)/Porto Alegre: Vozes/Editora da UFRS, 1993, p. 556-587.

KOJÈVE, A. Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Paris: Gallimard, 1947.

LEBRUN, G. O avesso da dialética: Hegel à luz de Nietzsche. Trad. Renato Janine Ribeiro. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1988.

MARCEL, G. “Les conditions dialectiques de la philosophie de l’intuition”. In: Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, XX, 5 (1912), p. 638-652.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. La structure du comportement. Paris: PUF, 1942.

______. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.

______. Éloge de la philosophie. Paris: Gallimard, 1953.

______. Signes. Paris: Gallimard, 1960.

______. Le visible et l’invisible. Paris: Gallimard, 1964.

______. Les aventures de la dialectique. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.

______. Résumés de cours: Collège de France (1952-1960). Paris: Gallimard, 1968.

______. Humanisme et terreur. Paris: Gallimard, 1972.

______. Sens et non-sens. Paris: Gallimard, 1996.

______. Notes de cours (1959-1961). Paris: Gallimard, 1996.

______. Parcours deux (1951-1961). Lagrasse: Verdier, 2000.

______. L’institution/La passivité: notes de cours au Collége de France

(1954-1955). Paris: Belin, 2003.

_____. “Inédits”. In: DUPOND, P. Vocabulário de Merleau-Ponty. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2010.

STANGUENNEC, A. “O dialético, a dialética, as dialéticas em Hegel”. Trad. Agemir Bavaresco/Danilo V. C. Costa/Paulo R. Konzen. In: Revista Opinião Filosófica, 2, 1 (jan.-jun. 2011), p. 33-49.

TAGGART, J. E. M. “Do verdadeiro sentido da dialética de Hegel”. Trad. Danilo V. C. R. M. Costa. In: Problemata Rev. Int. de Filosofia, 4, 1 (jan.-jun. 2013), p. 315-333.

TAMINIAUX, J. “Merleau-Ponty: de la dialectique à l’hyperdialectique”. In: Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 01 (mar. 1978), p. 34-55. Também em Recoupements. Bruxelles: Ousia, 1982.

VAZ, H. C. L. “Senhor e escravo: uma parábola da filosofia ocidental”. In: Síntese – Nova Fase, 21 (jan.-abr. 1981), p. 7-29.

WAHL, J. Le malheur de la conscience dans la philosophie de Hegel. 2. ed. Paris: PUF, 1951.

Published

2015-03-24

How to Cite

Silva, C. A. de F. da. (2015). Merleau-Ponty and the Heritage of the Hegelian Dialectic. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 59(2), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2014.2.12248