Evaluation of adherence to immunosuppressive therapy by self-report of patients submitted to renal transplantation

Authors

  • Dagoberto França Rocha Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS
  • Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Simone Travi Canabarro Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA
  • Aline Winter Sudbrack Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28181

Keywords:

medication adherence, patient compliance, kidney transplantation.

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the characteristics and risk factors related to the adherence to immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant patients using the self-report method by means of the Basel Assessment of Adherence Scale for Immunosuppressives (BAASIS).

METHODS: A prospective cohort study with a quantitative approach was performed at the Nephrology and Transplantation Service of São Lucas Hospital of the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, with patients older than 18 years, transplanted from kidneys from deceased or living donors, with a minimum transplant time of three months and a maximum of 12 months. The BAASIS instrument was applied to evaluate adhesion. For statistical analysis, Fisher exact test (Monte Carlo simulation) was used to verify the association between the categorical variables, Student t test for independent sample means and Mann Whitney test in the variables without normality. A p<0.05 was adopted for the results to be considered significant.

RESULTS: The sample consisted of 59 patients, 57.6% of whom were male, 79.7% were white, the mean age was 45.8 years, 57.6% had elementary school and 72.9% were catholic. Hemodialysis was the most used method, in 86.4% of patients before transplantation, and the mean time in the waiting list was 19.5 months. After transplantation, the mean time of hospitalization was 17.2 days. The assessment of adherence by BAASIS characterized 83% of patients as non-adherent. The main fact considered as non-adherence was to take the immunosuppressive drugs with more than two hours difference from the prescribed time, at least once a week, in the last four weeks. There was no significant difference when the statistical analysis was performed to compare the adhesion rate among the various categories of the demographic and clinical variables of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of patients not adherent to the immunosuppressive treatment was identified, and the change in the schedule of immunosuppressants was the main fact that characterized this behavior. A shorter waiting time in the transplant queue was associated with non-adherence. The other variables, demographic and clinical, were not associated to the classification of adherent or non-adherent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dagoberto França Rocha, Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS

Mestre em Ensino na Saúde pela Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA. Especialista em Captação, Doação e Transplantes pelo Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein. Enfermeiro da Organização de Procura de Órgãos do Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS.

Ana Elizabeth Figueiredo, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

Enfermeira, Professora Doutora em Ciências da Saúde - Programa de Pós Graduação em Clínica Médica e Ciências da Saúde da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul- PUCRS.

Simone Travi Canabarro, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA

Enfermeira, Professora, Doutora em Medicina Saúde da Criança/ Pediatria, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ensino na Saúde da Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA

Aline Winter Sudbrack, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA

Socióloga, Professora, Doutora em Sociologia, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ensino na Saúde da Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre - UFCSPA.

References

Tonelli M, Wiebe N, Knoll G, Bello A. Systematic Review : Kidney Transplantation Compared With Dialysis in Clinically Relevant Outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2093-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03686.x

Ball S, Dallman MJ. Immunology of Graft Rejection. In: Sciences EH, editor. Kidney Transplantation - Principles and Practice. 7th ed. 2013. p. 880.

Landreneau K, Lee K, Landreneau M. Quality of life in patients undergoing hemodialysis and renal transplantation: a meta-analytic review. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010;37(1):37-44.

Garcia CD, Pereira JD, Zago MK, Garcia VD. Manual de Doação e Transplantes. 1a. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Editora Ltda; 2013. 352 p.

Mercado-Martinez FJ, Ibarra-Hernández E, Asencio-Mera CD, Diaz-Medina B a., Padilla-Altamira C, Kierans C. Viviendo con Trasplante Renal, Sin Protección Social en Salud. ¿Qué Dicen los Enfermos sobre las Dificultades Económicas que Enfrentan y sus Efectos? Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(10):2092-100. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00150713

Robinson BM, Akizawa T, Jager KJ, Kerr PG, Saran R, Pisoni RL. Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):294-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30448-2

Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. Censo da Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia 2016 [Internet] São Paulo; 2017 [cited 2017 jun 10]. Available from: http://censo-sbn.org.br/censosAnteriores

Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos - ABTO. Registro Brasileiro de Transplantes 2016 [Internet]. São Paulo; 2017 [cited 2017, jun 8]. Available from: http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/file/RBT/2016/RBT2016-leitura.pdf

Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos - ABTO. Registro Brasileiro de Transplantes, Janeiro/Marco-2017 [Internet]. São Paulo; 2017 [cited 2017, jun 8]. Available from: http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/file/RBT/2017/2017_leitura_1T.pdf

Denhaerynck K, Steiger J, Bock A, Schäfer-Keller P, Köfer S, Thannberger N, De Geest S. Prevalence and risk factors of non-adherence with immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(1):108-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01611.x

Prendergast MB, Gaston RS. Optimizing medication adherence: An ongoing opportunity to improve outcomes after kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(7):1305-11. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.07241009

Gordon EJ, Gallant M, Sehgal AR, Conti D, Siminoff LA. Medication-taking among adult renal transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 2009;22(5):534-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00827.x

Fine RN, Becker Y, De Geest S, Eisen H, Ettenger R, Evans R, Rudow DL, McKay D, Neu A, Nevins T, Reyes J, Wray J, Dobbels F. Nonadherence consensus conference summary report. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02495.x

Schafer-Keller P, Steiger J, Bock A, Denhaerynck K, De Geest S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Measurement Methods to Assess Non-Adherence to Immunosuppressive Drugs in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:616-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02127.x

Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. Nejm. 2005;353:487-97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra050100

Chisholm MA, Lance CE, Williamson GM, Mulloy LL. Development and validation of the immunosuppressant therapy adherece instrument (ITAS). Patient Educ Couseling. 2005;59:13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.003

Marsicano Ede O, Fernandes Nda S, Colugnati F, Grincenkov FR, Fernandes NM, De Geest S, Sanders-Pinheiro H. Transcultural adaptation and initial validation of Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Basel assessment of adherence to immunosuppressive medications scale (BAASIS) in kidney transplants. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:108. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-14-108

Dobbels F, Berben L, De Geest S, Drent G, Lennerling A, Whittaker C, Kugler C; Transplant360 Task Force. The psychometric properties and practicability of self-report instruments to identify medication nonadherence in adult transplant patients: a systematic review. Transplantation. 2010;90(2):205-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e346cd

Lennerling A, Forsberg A. Self-reported non-adherence and beliefs about medication in a Swedish kidney transplant population. Open Nurs J. 2012;6:41-6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601206010041

Dew MA, DiMartini AF, De Vito Dabbs A, Myaskovsky L, Steel J, Unruh M, Switzer GE, Zomak R, Kormos RL, Greenhouse JB. Rates and Risk Factors for Nonadherence to the Medical Regimen After Adult Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation. 2007;83(7):858-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000258599.65257.a6

De Geest S, Burkhalter H, Bogert L, Berben L, Glass TR, Denhaerynck K. Describing the evolution of medication nonadherence from pretransplant until 3 years post-transplant and determining pretransplant medication nonadherence as risk factor for post-transplant nonadherence to immunosuppressives: The Swiss Transplant Cohort S. Transpl Int. 2014;27(7):657-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.12312

Massey EK, Tielen M, Laging M, Timman R, Beck DK, Khemai R, van Gelder T, Weimar W. Discrepancies between beliefs and behavior: a prospective study into immunosuppressive medication adherence after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2015;99(2):375-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000608

Massey EK, Tielen M, Laging M, Beck DK, Khemai R, van Gelder T, Weimar W. The role of goal cognitions, illness perceptions and treatment beliefs in self-report adherence after kidney transplantation: A cohort study. J Psychosom Res. 2013;229-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.006

Couzi L, Moulin B, Morin M-P, Albano L, Godin M, Barrou B, Alamartine E, Morelon E, Girardot-Seguin S, Mendes L, Misdrahi D, Cassuto E, Merville P. Factors Predictive of Medication Nonadherence After Renal Transplantation: A French Observational Study. Transplant J. 2013;95(2):326-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e318271d7c1

Massey EK, Meys K, Kemer R, Weimar W, Roodnat J, Cransberg K. Young Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients: Nonadherent and Happy. Transplantation. 2015;99(8):89-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000000639

Spivey CA, Chisholm-Burns MA, Damadzadeh B, Billheimer D. Determining the effect ofimmunosuppressant adherence on graftfailure risk among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12283

Burkhalter H, Wirz-Justice A, Cajochen C, Weaver TE, Steiger J, Fehr T, Venzin RM, De Geest S. Daytime sleepiness in renal transplantrecipients is associated with immunosuppressive non-adherence: across-sectional, multi-center study. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:58-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12279

Akman B, Uyar M, Afsar B, Sezer S, Ozdemir FN, Haberal M. Adherence, depression and quality of life in patients on a renal transplantation waiting list. Transpl Int. 2007;20(8):682-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00495.x

Silva AN, Moratelli L, Tavares PL, Marsicano E de O, Pinhati RR, Colugnati FA, Lucchetti G, Sanders-Pinheiro H. Self-efficacy beliefs, locus of control, religiosity and non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplant patients. Neprology. 2016;21(11):938-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12695

Tielen M, van Exel J, Laging M, Beck DK, Khemai R, van Gelder T, Betjes MG, Weimar W, Massey EK. Attitudes to medication after kidney transplantation and their association with medication adherence and graft survival: a 2-year follow-up study. J Transpl. 2014;2014:675301. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/675301

Published

2017-11-25

How to Cite

Rocha, D. F., Figueiredo, A. E., Canabarro, S. T., & Sudbrack, A. W. (2017). Evaluation of adherence to immunosuppressive therapy by self-report of patients submitted to renal transplantation. Scientia Medica, 27(4), ID28181. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28181

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)