“Stress and Coping Questionnaire against COVID-19 – Adolescents”:
Evidences of Validity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2024.1.42866Keywords:
stress and coping measures, psychological assessment, adolescence, coronavirus.Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic triggered stressful events for the entire population. However, as it is a critical stage of development, adolescents do not have all the regulatory skills yet developed to face Pandemic stressors. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the evidence of validity of the “Stress and Coping Questionnaire against of COVID-19” for adolescents between 11 and 18 years old. The content validity coefficient was .96 refers to the global scale. The judges evaluated both the stressors and the coping alternatives. Reliability coefficients were .81 and .82 to coping and stress dimensions, respectively Although it is suggested that the assessment occurs in a way that integrates the two dimensions, they can still be assessed separately. A Principal Component Analysis showed three distinct components: restriction of means and information, family support (concerns family support for coping with stress), and competencies, which presents coherence with the Motivational Theory of Coping, theoretical basis for the instrument. Further studies with different sociodemographic characteristics are suggested for more evidence of validity and its interpretation
Downloads
References
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Connor-Smith, J. K., Compas, B. E., Wadsworth, M. E., Thomsen, A. H., & Saltzman, H. (2000). Responses to stress in adolescence: Measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 976-992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.68.6.976
Dawis, R. V. (2000). Scale construction and psychometric considerations. In Howard E. A. Tinsley & Steven D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling (pp. 65-94). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50004-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50004-5
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behavior. (Vol. 66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Fegert, J. M., Vitiello, B., Plener, P. L., & Clemens, V. (2020). Challenges and burden of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: a narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-020-00329-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-020-00329-3
Gamba, J. R. G. (2020). The social importance of technology and the fundamental right of internet access. Electronic Magazine Sapere Aude, 1(2), 45-57. http://revistaeletronicasapereaude.emnuvens.com.br/sapere/article/view/47/27
Gavazzi, S. M., Anderson, S. A., & Sabatelli, R. M. (1993). Family differentiation, peer differentiation, and adolescent adjustment in a clinical sample. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8(2), 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489382005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489382005
Guessoum, S. B., Lachal, J., Radjack, R., Carretier, E., Minassian, S., Benoit, L., & Moro, M. R. (2020). Adolescent psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. Psychiatry Research, 113264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113264
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Minor, V., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M. O’Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delaqcua F., Kirby, J., Duda, S. N., REDCap Consrotium. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software partners. J Biomed Inform, 95, 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Jackson, S., & Goossens, L. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of adolescent development. Psychology press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969861
Jiao, W. Y., Wang, L. N., Liu, J., Fang, S. F., Jiao, F. Y., Pettoello-Mantovani, M., & Somekh, E. (2020). Behavioral and Emotional Disorders in Children during the COVID-19 Epidemic. The Journal of Pediatrics, 221, 264-266.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.013
Reis, E. A., & Reis A. A. (2002) Descriptive Data Analysis. Technical Report of the Department of Statistics of UFMG. https://www.est.ufmg.br/portal/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/RTE-02-2002.pdf
Magson, N. R., Freeman, J. Y., Rapee, R. M., Richardson, C. E., Oar, E. L., & Fardouly, J. (2021). Risk and protective factors for prospective changes in adolescent mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of youth and adolescence, 50, 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01332-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01332-9
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, Taylor, R. Thielke, J Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde J. G. (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform, 42(2), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Pasquali, L. (2010). Instrumentação psicológica: Fundamentos e práticas. Artmed.
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
R Core Team. (2020). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.0.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Rosanbalm, K. D., & Murray, D. W. (2018). Co-regulation from birth through young adulthood: A practice brief. Duke University, 1-10. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/resource/self
Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81(1), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x
Shirtcliff, E. A., Dahl, R. E., & Pollak, S. D. (2009). Pubertal development: correspondence between hormonal and physical development. Child development, 80(2), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01263.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01263.x
Silva, A. M. B., Weide, J. N., Valandro, G. S., Markus, J., Cardoso, N. O., & Machado, W. L. (2020). Instruments for assessing coping in children and adolescents: a systematic review. [Manuscript submitted for publication].
Skinner, E. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2016). The Development of Coping (eBook). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41740-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41740-0
Skinner, E. A., & Wellborn, J. G. (1994). Enfrentamento durante a infância e adolescência: Uma perspectiva motivacional. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lerner, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Desenvolvimento e comportamento ao longo da vida (Vol. 12, pp. 91–133). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological methods, 16(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Zinbarg, R. E., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., McDonald, R. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale's indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(2), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621605278814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621605278814
Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of modern applied statistical methods, 6(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Psico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Psico implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Psico as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.