YO RESPIRO
Experiencia y materialidades de información en objetos inteligentes y plataformas digitales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2020.1.37471Palabras clave:
Experiencia, Neomaterialismo, Algoritmos, Objetos Inteligentes, Plataformas DigitalesResumen
Este artículo explora las materialidades digitales de la información a partir de la experiencia de datificación de la ansiedad y el monitoreo respiratorio a través del uso del dispositivo vestible Spire Stone. Presentamos el informe de uso personal del wearable y un análisis descriptivo de la trayectoria de la producción de información en la asociación cuerpo-algoritmos-wearable. Argumentamos que las materialidades de la información se refieren menos a las esencias representativas (soft) o materiales (hard) de lo vestible-plataforma, y más a las cadenas de acción y consecuencias prácticas producidas durante la experiencia de monitoreo. Sugerimos la noción de experiencia en William James como un enfoque complementario a los estudios que eligen explorar las materialidades digitales de la información en el proceso dinámico de su propia formación, evitando perspectivas centradas en la especificidad técnica de los objetos inteligentes o restringidas a la percepción humana de su uso.
Descargas
Citas
BARAD, K. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press, 2007.
BENNET, J. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, London: Duke University Press Durham, NC, 2010.
BERRY, D. The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. [S. l.]: Springer, 2016.
BITENCOURT, E. C. QUEM GANHA QUANDO EU DURMO BEM?: a retórica procedimental como modo de midiatização dos cuidados de si na Fitbit Charge 2. Revista Observatório, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 113-148, 2018. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.2447-4266.2018v4n4p113.
BITENCOURT, E. C. SMARTBODIES CORPO, TECNOLOGIAS VESTÍVEIS E PERFORMATIVIDADE ALGORÍTMICA: Um estudo exploratório dos modos heurísticos de corporar na plataforma Fitbit. [S. l.]: Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), 2019.
BRAIDOTTI, R. The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2013.
BUCHER, T. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information Communication and Society, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 30-44, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.
BUCHER, T. If...Then Algorithimic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
CALLON, M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The sociological review, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 1_suppl, p. 196-233, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
CARD, S. K.; NEWELL, A.; MORAN, T. P. The psychology of human-computer interaction. [S. l.]: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203736166.
CHENEY-LIPPOLD, J. We are data. Algorithms and the making of our digital selves. New York: New York University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1gk0941.
COULDRY, N.; MEJIAS, U. A. Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television and New Media, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 4, p. 336-349, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632.
DRAUDE, C. Computing Bodies. Gender Codes and Anthropomorphic Design at the Human-Computer Interface. Kassel, Germany: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18660-9_2.
FERRIS, L.; DUGUAY, S. Tinder ’ s lesbian digital imaginary: Investigating ( im ) permeable boundaries of sexual identity on a popular dating app. Big Data & Society, [s. l.], p. 1-18, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819864903.
FOX, N. J.; ALLDRED, P. Sociology and the New Materialism. Theory, Research, Action. London, England: SAGE Publications, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526401915.
GERLITZ, C.; HELMOND, A. The Like Economy: Social Buttons and the Data-intensive Web. New Media & Society, [s. l.] n. 4, p. 1-29, February 2013.
GILLESPIE, T. Custodians Of The Internet. London: Yale University Press, 2018.
HANSEN, M. B. N. Bodies in Code: Interfaces with Digital Media. New York: Routledge, 2006. v. 1
HARMAN, G. Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. [S. l.]: Open Court Publishing, 2005.
HARMAN, G. The quadruple object. Hants, UK: Zero Books, 2011.
HARMAN, G. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. E-book.
HOLT, M. et al. Ambulatory monitoring of respiratory effort using a clothing-adhered biosensor. In: IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS (MEMEA). Anais [...]. [S. l.]: IEEE, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2018.8438678.
JAMES, W. Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York, London: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1912.
JAMES, W. A pluralistic universe. In: William James Writings 1902-1910. New York: The Library of America, 1987.
JAMES, W. Pragmatism (1907). In: Pragmatism and Other Writings. London: Penguin Books, 2000a.
JAMES, W. From The Meaning of Truth (1909). In: Pragmatism and Other Writings. London: Penguin Books, 2000b.
LAPOUJADE, D. William James Empirisme et pragmatisme. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond, 2007.
LATOUR, B. How to Talk About the Body? the Normative Dimension of Science Studies. Body & Society, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2-3, p. 205-229, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.
LATOUR, B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2005.
LATOUR, B. Enquête sur les modes d’existence: une anthropologie des Modernes. Paris: É ditions La Dé couverte, 2012.
LAW, J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems practice, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 379-393, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830.
LEMOS, A.; BITENCOURT, E. Performative sensibility and the communication of things. Matrizes USP, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 165-188, 2018. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i3p165-188.
LEMOS, A.; BITENCOURT, E. “Move and Be Healthy!”: Performative Sensibility and Body Experiences Mediated by Wearable Devices in Brazil. In: PEREIRA NETO, A.; FLYNN, M. B. (ed.). The Internet and Health in Brazil: Challenges and Trends. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. p. 415-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99289-1_21.
LUPTON, D. ‘ I Just Want It to Be Done, Done, Done !’ Food Tracking Apps, Affects, and Agential Capacities. Multimodal Technologies Interact, [s. l.], v. 2, n. 29, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020029
LUPTON, D.; SMITH, G. J. D. ‘A Much Better Person’: The Agential Capacities of Self-Tracking Practices Deborah. In: AJANA, B. (ed.). . Metric Culture: Ontologies of Self-Tracking Practices. London.: Emerald Publishing, 2017. p. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-289-520181004.
MARRES, N. Digital Sociology: The reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2017.
MAYER-SCHÖNBERGER, V.; CUKIER, K. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. [S. l.]: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013. E-book.
NORMAN, D. A. Cognitive engineering — cognitive science, Interfacing thought: cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.
OH, J.; LEE, U. Exploring UX issues in quantified self technologies. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE COMPUTING AND UBIQUITOUS NETWORKING (ICMU), 8., 2015. [S. l.: s. n.]: 2015. p. 53-59.
PARIKKA, J. Postscript: Of Disappearances and the Ontology of Media (Studies). Media After Kittler, [s. l.], p. 177-190, 2015.
PASTOR, L.; LEMOS, A. A Fotografia como Prática Conversacional de Dados: espacialização e sociabilidade digital no uso do Instagram em praças e parques na cidade de Salvador. Comunicação Mídia e Consumo, [s. l.], v. 15, n. 42, p. 10-33, 2018. https://doi.org/10.18568/cmc.v15i42.1611.
PINK, S.; ARDÈVOL, E.; LANZENI, D. Digital materialities: Design and anthropology. [S. l.]: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2016.
ROSENBERGER, R.; VERBEEK, P.-P. Postphenomenological Investigations Essays. Essays on Human–Technology Relations. London: LEXINGTON BOOKS, 2015. v. 1
RUMBAUGH, J. et al. Object-oriented modeling and design. [S. l.]: Prentice-hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991. v. 199
SERRES, M. Hominescências: o começo de uma outra humanidade? Tradução Edgard de Assis Carvalho e Mariza Perassi Bosco. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2003.
SOURIAU, É. Les différents modes d’existence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2009.
VAN DIJCK, J.; POELL, T.; WAAL, M. DE. The Platform Society. New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001.
VERBEEK, P.-P. What Things Do. Philosophical Reflections On Technology, Agency, and Design. Traducao Robert P. Crease. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005. v. 1. https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gp4w7.
ZAMPINO, L. Self-tracking Technologies and the Menstrual Cycle : Embodiment and Engagement with Lay and Expert Knowledge. Tecnoscienza, Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 31-52, 2019.
ZUBOFF, S. Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 75-89, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista FAMECOS
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de Autor
La sumisión de originales para la Revista Famecos implica la transferencia, por los autores, de los derechos de publicación. El copyright de los artículos de esta revista es el autor, junto con los derechos de la revista a la primera publicación. Los autores sólo podrán utilizar los mismos resultados en otras publicaciones indicando claramente a Revista Famecos como el medio de la publicación original.
Creative Commons License
Excepto donde especificado de modo diferente, se aplican a la materia publicada en este periódico los términos de una licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional, que permite el uso irrestricto, la distribución y la reproducción en cualquier medio siempre y cuando la publicación original sea correctamente citada.
