The misconceptions of Peirce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2004.25.3295Keywords:
Peirce's semiotics, interpretant, communication researchAbstract
This text intends to show the misunderstandings, deficiencies and inaccuracies of the semiotic theory of C. S. Peirce so used in research on images, texts and expressions in general in Brazil. The author problematizes certain key concepts of this theory and preaches the need for a rigorous investigation of his writings. To this end, he sets out to begin this task by discussing the concept of "interpretant."
Downloads
References
DELEDALLE, Gérard. Peirce. In: Dictionnaire des Philosophes. Paris: Albin-Michel, 1998.
DERRIDA, Jacques. De la Grammatologie. Paris: Ed. de Minuit, 1967.
GANDILLAC, Maurice de. Duns Scot. In: Dictionnaire des Philosophes. Paris: Albin-Michel, 1998.
HABERMAS, J. Conhecimento e interesse. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1982.
LYOTARD, J.F. O pós-moderno. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1979.
MARCONDES, Ciro. A produção social da loucura. São Paulo: Paulus, 2003.
______. Da arte de envenenar dinossauros e outros textos mediáticos. São Paulo: Com-Arte, 2003.
PEIRCE, C.S. Carta a Lady Welby. In: Hardwick, C.(org.), Semiotics ans Significs: The Correspondance between C. S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington, 1977.
SHORT, T.L. Semiosis and Intentionality. Transactions of the C. C. Peirce Society, v. 17, n. 3, 1981.
THIBAUD, P. La notion peircéenne d’interprétant. Dialectica, v. 37, Fasc. 1, p. 4-35, 1983.




