History of four "M"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.1998.9.3004Keywords:
Communication, Midiology, ArtAbstract
What if any system was a failed masterpiece? And if the very fact of expressing itself in general, without a singular subject, addressed to all, urbi et orbi, without specific recipient, place or date, was the disguised renunciation of the work that could have been or was born if the theory Had, according to the Proustian council, retained the "force of restraining itself to accompany an impression through its successive states until it fixed itself in the expression"? In this case, the apprentice theoretician should, if not give up the graphs, glossaries, correlations and laws, at least follow "the trace that the world imprints on us, the only real, authentic."Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2008-04-10
How to Cite
Debray, R. (2008). History of four "M". Revista FAMECOS, 5(9), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.1998.9.3004
Issue
Section
Articles




