Necessidad temporal en Buridan y Jandun

alrededor De Caelo I.12

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.45576

Palabras clave:

Juan Buridan, Juan de Jandun, variedades de necessidad, modalidades medievales, De Caelo

Resumen

Este artículo investiga la conexión entre modalidad y tiempo en dos maestros de arte parisinos activos en la primera mitad del siglo XIV, Juan Buridán (c.1290-c.1361) y Juan de Jandún (c.1286-c.1328). El objetivo es dilucidar su enfoque de la naturaleza de esta relación en un conjunto de textos poco explorados en los debates sobre la interpretación de las modalidades medievales, a saber, los comentarios al final del primer libro del De Caelo de Aristóteles. La interpretación de la relación entre lo que es “necesario” y lo que “siempre es” en este texto ha recibido interpretaciones divergentes sobre la controvertida asimilación de necesidad y omnitemporalidad en las concepciones premodernas de las modalidades. Analizando el debate en torno a los pasajes aristotélicos del De Caelo planteado por ambos filósofos pertenecientes al entorno de la Facultad de Letras de París, el artículo demuestra que dicha asimilación no fue consensuada. Contrastando los análisis de Jandun y Buridan, se concluye que aunque Buridan acomoda la necesidad temporal presupuesta en el De Caelo como una necesidad condicional, desarrolla una crítica de la validez general de los argumentos de Aristóteles relativos a las modalidades absolutas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Guido Alt, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Rio Grande do Sul, PUCRS.

CAPES/PrInt Investigador del Programa de Postgrado en Filosofía de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Rio Grande do Sul Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad de Estocolmo (Suecia) y la Universidad de Colonia (Alemania).

Citas

ARISTÓTELES. On the Heavens I and II. Edited and Translated by S. Legatt. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995.

ARISTÓTELES. Prior Analytics. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by Gisela Striker. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

BURIDAN, João. Tractatus de Consequentiis. Edited by Hubert Hubien. Leuven: Publications Universitaires, 1976.

BURIDAN, João. Questiones longe super librum Perihermeneias. Ed. Ria van der Lecq. Ingenium Publishers, 1983.

BURIDAN, João. Expositio et Questiones in Aristotelis De Caelo. Edited by Benoît Patar. Louvain-Paris: Éditions Peeters, 1996.

BURIDAN, João. Summulae de Dialectica. Translated by Gyula Klima. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001a.

BURIDAN, João. Summulae: De demonstrationibus. Edited by L.M. De Rijk. Groningen-Haren: Ingenium Publishers, 2001b.

BURIDAN, João. Summulae: de Propositionibus. Introduction, critical edition and indexes by Ria van der Lecq. Brepols, 2005.

BURIDAN, João. Treatise on Consequences. Translated by Stephen Read. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.

BURIDAN, João. Quaestiones in Priorum Analyticorum Aristotelis. Unpublished edition by Hubert Hubien, s.d.

JANDUN, John. In libros Aristotelis de Coelo et Mundo quae extant questiones subtilissimae. Veneza, 1552.

JANDUN, John. Quaestiones Perspicacissimi Peripatetici Ioannis de Gandavo in duodictum libros Metaphysice. Veneza, 1525.

Literatura Secundária

ALT, Guido. Buridan’s Reinterpretation of Natural Possibility and Necessity. In: HOCHSCHILD, Joshua; WOOD, Adam; NEVITT; Turner; BORBÉLY, Gábor (orgs.), Metaphysics through Semantics. The Philosophical Recovery of the Medieval Mind. Cham: Springer, pp. 237-253, 2023a.

ALT, Guido. Varieties of Necessity in John Buridan. Logic and Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages. Stockholm: University Press, 2023b.

BROADIE, Sarah. The Possibilities of Being and Not-being in De Caelo 1.11-12. In: BOWEN, Alan; WILDBERG, Christian (orgs.) New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Philosophia Antiqua: A series of studies in ancient philosophy, 117. Leiden, Boston: Brill, pp. 29-50, 2009.

BENET, Jean-Baptiste. Jandun, John of. In: LAGERLUND, Henrik (org.) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500-1500, Second Edition, Springer Reference. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers, pp. 978-980, 2020.

DENYER, Nicholas. Never Will and Cannot. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 74, no. 1, Aristotle on Modality, pp. 163–178, 2000.

GASKIN. Richard. The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the metaphysics of the future. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko. Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.

HUGHES, George E. The Modal Logic of John Buridan. In: CORSI, Giovanni; MAGNIONE, Corrado; MUGNAI, Massimo (orgs.) Atti del Convegno internazionale di storia della logica: la teorie delle modalita. Bologna: CLUEB, pp. 93-111, 1989.

JONSTON, Spencer. “A Formal Reconstruction of John Buridan’s Modal Syllogism.” History and Philosophy of Logic, v. 36, no. 1, pp. 2-17, 2015.

JUDSON, Lindsay. Eternity and necessity in De Caelo I.12. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, v. 1, pp. 217–255, 1983.

KLIMA, Gyula. John Buridan. Great Medieval Thinkers. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

KLIMA, Gyula. Consequence. In: DUTILH NOVAES, Catarina; READ, Stephen (orgs.). The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 316–341, 2016.

KING, Peter. Consequence as Inference: Mediaeval Proof theory 1300-1350. In: YRJÖNSUURI, Mikko (org.). Medieval Formal Logic: Obligations, Insolubles and Consequences, The New Synthese Historical Library. Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy, 49. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 117-145, 2001.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Time and Modality in Scholasticism. In: KNUUTTILA, Simo (org.). Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Studies of the History of Modal Theories, New Synthese Historical Library. Texts and Studies in the History of Logic and Philosophy, 20. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 163-257, 1981.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 1993.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Necessities in John Buridan’s Natural Philosophy. In: THIJSSEN, J.M.M.H.; ZUPKO, Jack (orgs.). The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill, pp. 65–76, 2001.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Modality. In MARENBON, John (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 312–241, 2012.

LAMBERTINI, Roberto. Jandun’s Question-commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In: AMERINI, Fabrizio; GALLUZZO, Gabriele (orgs.). A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Leiden- Boston: Brill, pp. 385-412, 2013.

NORMORE, Calvin. Buridanian Possibilities. In: FINK, Jacob; HANSEN, Heine; MORA-MARQUEZ, Ana María (orgs.). Logic and Language in the Middle Ages. A Volume in Honour of Sten Ebbesen. Boston-Leiden: Brill, pp. 389-402, 2013.

NORMORE, Calvin. Scotus, Modality, Instants of Nature, and the Contingency of the Present. In HONNEFELDER, Ludger; WOOD, Rega; DREYER, Mechthild (orgs.). John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics. Leiden, New York: E.J. Brill, pp. 161-174 1996.

PANNACIO, Claude. Ockham’s Commitment to Merely Possible Beings. Medioevo: Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale, v. 44, pp. 81–98, 2019.

PARSONS, Terrence. Articulating Medieval Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

PASNAU, Robert. Medieval Modal Spaces. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 94, no. 1, pp. 225–254, 2020.

PERINI-SANTOS, Ernesto. L’extension de la liste des modalités dans les commentaires du Perihemeneias et des Sophistici Elenchi de Guillaume d’Ockham. Vivarium: A Journal for Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Intellectual Life, v. 40, no. 2, pp. 174-188, 2002.

READ, Stephen. Modality in medieval philosophy. In: BUENO, Otávio; SHALKOWSKI, Scott (orgs.). The Routledge Handbook of Modality. London: Routledge, pp. 344-354, 2020.

ROSEN, Jacob; MALINK, Marko. A Method of Modal Proof in Aristotle. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, v. 42, pp. 179–261, 2012.

SORABJI, Richard. Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1980.

SYLLA, Edith. Ideo quasi mendicare oportet intellectum humanum: The Role of Theology in John Buridan’s Natural Philosophy. In: THIJSSEN, J.M.M.H.; ZUPKO, Jack (orgs.). The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill, pp. 221-246, 2001.

THIJSSEN, Hans. Condemnation of 1277. In ZALTA, Edward (org.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University, 2018.

THOM, Paul. Principles in Buridan’s Logic of Consequences. In: LAGERLUND, Henrik; JOHNSTON, Spencer (orgs.). Interpreting Buridan: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, no prelo.

VAN DER LECQ, Ria. Introduction: Modality and time. In: VAN DER LECQ, Ria (org.). Iohannes Buridanus Questiones Longe Super Librum Perihermeneias. Edited with an introduction by Ria van der Lecq, Artistarium: A Series of Texts on Mediaeval Logic, Grammar and Semantics. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers, pp. xxviii-xxxiv, 1983.

WCIÓRKA, Wojciech. Mitigating the Necessity of the Past in the Second Half of the Twelfth Century: Future-dependent Predestination. Vivarium: A Journal for Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Intellectual Life, v. 58, pp. 29–64, 2020.

YRJÖNSUURI, Mikko. Obligations and Conditionals. Vivarium: A Journal for Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Intellectual Life, v. 53, pp. 322–335, 2015.

ZUPKO, Jack. John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth Century Arts Master. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.

Publicado

2024-06-28

Cómo citar

Alt, G. (2024). Necessidad temporal en Buridan y Jandun: alrededor De Caelo I.12. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 69(1), e45576. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.45576