Temporal necessity in Buridan and Jandun

debates over De Caelo I.12

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.45576

Keywords:

John Buridan, John of Jandun, varieties of necessity, medieval modalities, De Caelo

Abstract

This article investigates the connection between modality and temporality in two Parisian Arts Masters active in the first half of the fourteenth century, namely John Buridan (c.1290-c.1361) and John of Jandun (c.1286-c.1328). My aim is to clarify the approach taken by both concerning the nature of that connection in an underexplored set of texts, the commentaries on Aristotle’s De Caelo. The interpretation of the relationship between the ‘necessary’ and ‘what always is’ received divergent interpretations about the assimilation of necessity and omnitemporality in pre-modern modal conceptions. Through the analysis of the debate surrounding Aristotle’s passages by both philosophers belonging to the milieu of the Arts faculty in Paris, the paper aims to show that such an assimilation was not consensual. Contrasting Jandun’s and Buridan’s approaches, I conclude that even though Buridan accommodates the kind of temporal necessity involved in De Caelo as a conditional form of necessity, he develops a critique of the general validity of Aristotle’s arguments insofar as absolute modalities are involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Guido Alt, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, PUCRS.

CAPES/PrInt Researcher in the Postgraduate Program in Philosophy at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul. PhD in Philosophy from the University of Stockholm (Sweden) and the University of Cologne (Germany).

References

ARISTÓTELES. On the Heavens I and II. Edited and Translated by S. Legatt. Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995.

ARISTÓTELES. Prior Analytics. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by Gisela Striker. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

BURIDAN, João. Tractatus de Consequentiis. Edited by Hubert Hubien. Leuven: Publications Universitaires, 1976.

BURIDAN, João. Questiones longe super librum Perihermeneias. Ed. Ria van der Lecq. Ingenium Publishers, 1983.

BURIDAN, João. Expositio et Questiones in Aristotelis De Caelo. Edited by Benoît Patar. Louvain-Paris: Éditions Peeters, 1996.

BURIDAN, João. Summulae de Dialectica. Translated by Gyula Klima. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001a.

BURIDAN, João. Summulae: De demonstrationibus. Edited by L.M. De Rijk. Groningen-Haren: Ingenium Publishers, 2001b.

BURIDAN, João. Summulae: de Propositionibus. Introduction, critical edition and indexes by Ria van der Lecq. Brepols, 2005.

BURIDAN, João. Treatise on Consequences. Translated by Stephen Read. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.

BURIDAN, João. Quaestiones in Priorum Analyticorum Aristotelis. Unpublished edition by Hubert Hubien, s.d.

JANDUN, John. In libros Aristotelis de Coelo et Mundo quae extant questiones subtilissimae. Veneza, 1552.

JANDUN, John. Quaestiones Perspicacissimi Peripatetici Ioannis de Gandavo in duodictum libros Metaphysice. Veneza, 1525.

Literatura Secundária

ALT, Guido. Buridan’s Reinterpretation of Natural Possibility and Necessity. In: HOCHSCHILD, Joshua; WOOD, Adam; NEVITT; Turner; BORBÉLY, Gábor (orgs.), Metaphysics through Semantics. The Philosophical Recovery of the Medieval Mind. Cham: Springer, pp. 237-253, 2023a.

ALT, Guido. Varieties of Necessity in John Buridan. Logic and Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages. Stockholm: University Press, 2023b.

BROADIE, Sarah. The Possibilities of Being and Not-being in De Caelo 1.11-12. In: BOWEN, Alan; WILDBERG, Christian (orgs.) New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Philosophia Antiqua: A series of studies in ancient philosophy, 117. Leiden, Boston: Brill, pp. 29-50, 2009.

BENET, Jean-Baptiste. Jandun, John of. In: LAGERLUND, Henrik (org.) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy: Philosophy between 500-1500, Second Edition, Springer Reference. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers, pp. 978-980, 2020.

DENYER, Nicholas. Never Will and Cannot. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 74, no. 1, Aristotle on Modality, pp. 163–178, 2000.

GASKIN. Richard. The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the metaphysics of the future. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.

HINTIKKA, Jaakko. Time and Necessity: Studies in Aristotle’s Theory of Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.

HUGHES, George E. The Modal Logic of John Buridan. In: CORSI, Giovanni; MAGNIONE, Corrado; MUGNAI, Massimo (orgs.) Atti del Convegno internazionale di storia della logica: la teorie delle modalita. Bologna: CLUEB, pp. 93-111, 1989.

JONSTON, Spencer. “A Formal Reconstruction of John Buridan’s Modal Syllogism.” History and Philosophy of Logic, v. 36, no. 1, pp. 2-17, 2015.

JUDSON, Lindsay. Eternity and necessity in De Caelo I.12. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, v. 1, pp. 217–255, 1983.

KLIMA, Gyula. John Buridan. Great Medieval Thinkers. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

KLIMA, Gyula. Consequence. In: DUTILH NOVAES, Catarina; READ, Stephen (orgs.). The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 316–341, 2016.

KING, Peter. Consequence as Inference: Mediaeval Proof theory 1300-1350. In: YRJÖNSUURI, Mikko (org.). Medieval Formal Logic: Obligations, Insolubles and Consequences, The New Synthese Historical Library. Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy, 49. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 117-145, 2001.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Time and Modality in Scholasticism. In: KNUUTTILA, Simo (org.). Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Studies of the History of Modal Theories, New Synthese Historical Library. Texts and Studies in the History of Logic and Philosophy, 20. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 163-257, 1981.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Modalities in Medieval Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge, 1993.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Necessities in John Buridan’s Natural Philosophy. In: THIJSSEN, J.M.M.H.; ZUPKO, Jack (orgs.). The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden-Boston-Köln: Brill, pp. 65–76, 2001.

KNUUTTILA, Simo. Modality. In MARENBON, John (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Medieval Philosophy. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 312–241, 2012.

LAMBERTINI, Roberto. Jandun’s Question-commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. In: AMERINI, Fabrizio; GALLUZZO, Gabriele (orgs.). A Companion to the Latin Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Leiden- Boston: Brill, pp. 385-412, 2013.

NORMORE, Calvin. Buridanian Possibilities. In: FINK, Jacob; HANSEN, Heine; MORA-MARQUEZ, Ana María (orgs.). Logic and Language in the Middle Ages. A Volume in Honour of Sten Ebbesen. Boston-Leiden: Brill, pp. 389-402, 2013.

NORMORE, Calvin. Scotus, Modality, Instants of Nature, and the Contingency of the Present. In HONNEFELDER, Ludger; WOOD, Rega; DREYER, Mechthild (orgs.). John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics. Leiden, New York: E.J. Brill, pp. 161-174 1996.

PANNACIO, Claude. Ockham’s Commitment to Merely Possible Beings. Medioevo: Rivista di Storia della Filosofia Medievale, v. 44, pp. 81–98, 2019.

PARSONS, Terrence. Articulating Medieval Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

PASNAU, Robert. Medieval Modal Spaces. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 94, no. 1, pp. 225–254, 2020.

PERINI-SANTOS, Ernesto. L’extension de la liste des modalités dans les commentaires du Perihemeneias et des Sophistici Elenchi de Guillaume d’Ockham. Vivarium: A Journal for Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Intellectual Life, v. 40, no. 2, pp. 174-188, 2002.

READ, Stephen. Modality in medieval philosophy. In: BUENO, Otávio; SHALKOWSKI, Scott (orgs.). The Routledge Handbook of Modality. London: Routledge, pp. 344-354, 2020.

ROSEN, Jacob; MALINK, Marko. A Method of Modal Proof in Aristotle. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, v. 42, pp. 179–261, 2012.

SORABJI, Richard. Necessity, Cause and Blame: Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1980.

SYLLA, Edith. Ideo quasi mendicare oportet intellectum humanum: The Role of Theology in John Buridan’s Natural Philosophy. In: THIJSSEN, J.M.M.H.; ZUPKO, Jack (orgs.). The Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy of John Buridan. Leiden, Boston, Köln: Brill, pp. 221-246, 2001.

THIJSSEN, Hans. Condemnation of 1277. In ZALTA, Edward (org.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab: Stanford University, 2018.

THOM, Paul. Principles in Buridan’s Logic of Consequences. In: LAGERLUND, Henrik; JOHNSTON, Spencer (orgs.). Interpreting Buridan: Critical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, no prelo.

VAN DER LECQ, Ria. Introduction: Modality and time. In: VAN DER LECQ, Ria (org.). Iohannes Buridanus Questiones Longe Super Librum Perihermeneias. Edited with an introduction by Ria van der Lecq, Artistarium: A Series of Texts on Mediaeval Logic, Grammar and Semantics. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers, pp. xxviii-xxxiv, 1983.

WCIÓRKA, Wojciech. Mitigating the Necessity of the Past in the Second Half of the Twelfth Century: Future-dependent Predestination. Vivarium: A Journal for Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Intellectual Life, v. 58, pp. 29–64, 2020.

YRJÖNSUURI, Mikko. Obligations and Conditionals. Vivarium: A Journal for Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Intellectual Life, v. 53, pp. 322–335, 2015.

ZUPKO, Jack. John Buridan: Portrait of a Fourteenth Century Arts Master. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Alt, G. (2024). Temporal necessity in Buridan and Jandun: debates over De Caelo I.12. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 69(1), e45576. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2024.1.45576