Coerência e veracidade na comunicação: indicialidade intracomunicacional e extracomunicacional

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2019.3.35617

Palavras-chave:

Comunicação. Mídia. Ficcionalidade.

Resumo

O objetivo deste artigo é construir um modelo para demonstrar como a comunicação humana, envolvendo todos os tipos de mídia, pode não apenas corresponder, mas também nos colocar em contato com a nossa percepção do mundo que nos rodeia. De que maneiras a verdade é realmente estabelecida pela comunicação? Para responder a isso, emprega-se a noção de índices: sinais baseados em contiguidade. No entanto, uma investigação dos índices na sua dimensão externa – criando a veracidade na comunicação – também requer uma compreensão da sua dimensão interna: criar a coerência. Para investigar essas duas funções, alguns conceitos e várias categorizações elementares são  propostas: argumenta-se que existem vários tipos de contiguidade e muitas variedades de objetos indiciais, o que invalida a distinção grosseira entre ficção e não ficção.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Lars Elleström, Universidade de Linnaeus, Växjö

Ph.D Comparative Literature. Professor de Literatura Comparada na Universidade de Linnaeus, na Suécia. Principais obras: Divine Madness: On Interpreting Literature, Music, and the Visual Arts Ironically (Bucknell University Press, 2002), Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) and Media Transformation: The Transfer of Media Characteristics Among Media (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).

Referências

ARISTOTLE. [c. 330 BCE]. In: BAXTER, John; ATHERTON, Patrick (ed.). Aristotle’s Poetics. Tradução de George Whalley. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997.

ATKIN, Albert. Peirce on the index and indexical reference. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Bloomington, v. 41, n. 1, p. 161-188, 2005.

BAXTER, John; ATHERTON, Patrick (ed.). Aristotle’s poetics. Tradução de George Whalley. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1997.

BERGMAN, Mats. Experience, purpose, and the value of vagueness: On C. S. Peirce’s contribution to the philosophy of communication. Communication Theory, Malden, v. 19, 2009. p. 248-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01343.x

BOOTH, Wayne C. The rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.

BREWER, William F. Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In: MORRIS, Peter (ed.). Modelling cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. p. 187-197.

BURKE, Tom. Peirce on truth and partiality. In: BARWISE, Jon; MARK GAWRON, Jean; PLOTKIN, Gordon; TUTIYA, Syun (ed.). Situation theory and its applications. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1991. p. 115-146. v. 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/416243

BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. v. 8.

COLAPIETRO, Vincent. Pointing things out: Exploring the indexical dimensions of literary texts. In: VEIVO, Harri; LJUNGBERG, Christina; JOHANSEN, Jørgen Dines (ed.). Redefining literary semiotics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. p. 109-133.

D’ALESSANDRO, William. Explicitism about truth in fiction. British Journal of Aesthetics, London, v. 56, p. 53-65, 2016.

ELLESTRÖM, Lars. The modalities of media: A model for understanding intermedial relations. In: ELLESTRÖM, Lars (ed.). Media borders, multimodality and intermediality, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. p. 11-48. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275201_2

ELLESTRÖM, Lars. Material and mental representation: Peirce adapted to the study of media and arts. American Journal of Semiotics, Bloomington, v. 30, n. ½, p. 83-138, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2014301/24

ELLESTRÖM, Lars. A medium-centered model of communication. Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Basingstoke, n. 224, 2018.

GALE, Richard M. The fictive use of language. Philosophy, Cambridge, v. 46, n. 178, p. 324-340, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003181910001696x

GALLAGHER, Catherine. The rise of fictionality. In: MORETTI, Franco (ed.). The novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006. p. 336-363. v. 1, History, geography and culture.

GAUDREAULT, André. From Plato to Lumière: Narration and monstration in literature and cinema. Tradução de Timothy Barnard. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442688148

GODOY, Hélio. Documentary realism, sampling theory and Peircean semiotics: Electronic audiovisual signs (analog or digital) as indexes of reality. Doc On-line, [S. l.], n. 2. p. 107-117, jul. 2007.

GOUDGE, Thomas A. Peirce’s index. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Bloomington, v. 1, n. 2, p. 52–70, 1965.

GRISHAKOVA, Marina. Literariness, fictionality, and the theory of possible worlds. In: SKALIN, Lars-Åke (ed.). Narrativity, fictionality, and literariness: The narrative turn and the study of literary fiction. Örebro: Örebro University Press, 2008. p. 57-76.

HARSHAW, Benjamin. Fictionality and fields of reference: Remarks on a theoretical framework. Poetics Today, Tel Aviv, v. 5. n. 2, p. 227-251, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/1771931

HOOKWAY, Christopher. Truth, rationality, and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.

HOWAT, Andrew W. Hookway’s Peirce on assertion & truth. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Bloomington, v. 51, n. 4, p. 419-443, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.4.03

MCCARTHY, Jeremiah. Semiotic idealism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Bloomington, v. 20, n. 4, p. 395-433, 1984.

NESHER, Dan. Peircean realism: Truth as the meaning of cognitive signs representing external reality. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, Bloomington, v. 33, n. 1, p. 201-257, 1997.

PAVEL, Thomas G. Fictional Worlds. Cambridge MASS: Harvard University Press, 1986.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Drafts of a review of Josiah Royce’s The World and the Individual. In: BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. cap. 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270842

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Fragment on consciousness and reasoning. In: BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. cap. 7. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270842

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Index. In: BALDWIN, James Mark (ed.). Dictionary of philosophy and psychology. New York: Macmillan, 1901. v. 1.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. One, two, three: fundamental categories of thought and of nature. In: BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. p. 369-378. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270842

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Prolegomena to an apology for pragmaticism. In: BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. cap. 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270842

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The art of reasoning. In: BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. v. 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270842

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Letter draft. In: BURKS, Arthur (ed.). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. cap. 8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270842

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Notes on topical geometry. In: The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1958. cap. 8. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270913

RONEN, Ruth. Completing the incompleteness of fictional entities. Poetics Today, Tel Aviv, v. 9, p. 497-514, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772729

RYAN, Marie-Laure. Fiction, non-factuals, and the principle of minimal departure. Poetics, North Holland, v. 9, n. 4, p. 403-422, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(80)90030-3

RYAN, Marie-Laure. Fiction as a logical, ontological, and illocutionary issue. Style, Pennsylvania, v. 18. n. 2, p. 121-139, 1984.

RYAN, Marie-Laure. Possible worlds, artificial intelligence, and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.

SEARLE, John R. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 319-332, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2307/468422

SKOV NIELSEN, Henrik; PHELAN, James; WALSH, Richard. Ten theses about fictionality. Narrative, v. 23, n. 1, p. 61-73, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2015.0005

STJERNFELT, Frederik. Natural propositions: the actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston MA: Docent Press, 2014.

WALTON, Kendall L. Fiction, fiction-making and styles of fictionality. Philosophy and Literature, Baltimore, v. 7, n. 1, p. 78-88, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.1983.0004

WEST, Donna E. Indexical reference to absent objects. Chinese Semiotic Studies, Berlin, v. 6, n. 1, p. 280-294, 2009.

WEST, Donna E. Cognitive and linguistic underpinnings of deixis am phantasma: Bühler’s and Peirce’s semiotic. Sign Systems Studies, v. 41, n. 1, p. 21-41, 2013. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.02

WILDEKAMP, Ada, VAN MONTFOORT, Ineke; VAN RUISWIJK, Willem. Fictionality and convention. Poetics, North Holland, v. 9, p. 547-567, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(80)90006-6

YADAV, Alok. Literature, fictiveness, and postcolonial criticism. Novel, [S. l.], v. 43, n. 1, p. 189-196, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1215/00295132-2009-081

Downloads

Publicado

2019-12-27

Como Citar

Elleström, L. (2019). Coerência e veracidade na comunicação: indicialidade intracomunicacional e extracomunicacional. Revista FAMECOS, 26(3), e35617. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2019.3.35617

Edição

Seção

Autor Convidado