Is The Merchant of Venice a Comedy or a Tragicomedy?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2021.1.36937

Keywords:

Inwardness, Pathos, The Merchant of Venice, Tragicomedy Genre.

Abstract

This essay aims at discussing some issues in the play The Merchant of Venice, by William Shakespeare. Even though some may assume that the play is a comedy, the problem of its literary genre is a rather problematic issue today. Some critics debate its inclusion in the comedies, because it is not at all a funny play. The label ‘comedy’ did not suggest that it was a funny play in Shakespeare’s age. If some critics think that it is not a funny play, Shakespeare may have designed Shylock as a tragic character. In fact, the play’s effects of Shylock’s energy and tragic dimensions deeply influenced the audience in the moment when it was first staged. This essay first discusses the problem pathos and inwardness in Shylock’s speech. After that, it discusses the issue of literary genre and argues that it should be classified as a tragicomedy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carlos Roberto Ludwig, Universidade Federal do Tocantins (UFT), Porto Nacional, PN, Tocantins.

Professor Adjunto da Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT. Doutor e Mestre em Letras pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS. Graduado em Letras - Português, Inglês e Literaturas e Letras - Português, Francês e Literaturas pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – UFSM. Atualmente, é docente do Curso de Letras: Libras da UFT e atua como Docente Permanente e Coordenador do Programa de Pós Graduação em Letras, do Campus de Porto Nacional/UFT.

References

ADELMAN, Janet. Blood Relations: christian and jew in The Merchant of Venice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 2008. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226006833.001.0001.

ARISTOTLES. La Poétique. Paris: Éditions Seuil, 1980.

AUERBACH, E. Mímesis: a representação da realidade na literatura ocidental. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2007a.

AUERBACH, E. Ensaios de Literatura Ocidental. Tradução de Samuel Titan Jr. e José Marcos Mariani de Macedo. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2007b.

CHARLTON, H. B. Shakespearian Comedy. London & New York: Mathuen, 1984.

COETZEE, J. M. Doubling the Point: essays and interviews. Edited by David Attwell. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1992.

COHEN, D. Searching Shakespeare: studies in culture and authority. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442679689.

COOPER, J R. Shylock’s Humanity. Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1970, pp. 117-124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2868824.

COYLE, M. The Merchant of Venice: contemporary critical essays. Londres: Macmillan: 1998.

DILLON, J. Shakespeare’s tragicomedies. WELLS, S; GRAZIA, M. The new Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare. New York: Cambridge, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521886321.012.

DRAKAKIS, J. Historical difference and Venetian Patriarchy. In: COYLE, M. The Merchant of Venice: contemporary critical essays. Londres: Macmillan: 1998. p. 181-208.

FERREIRA, R. DE S. LUDWIG, C. R.; Life and Fiction: Imagination and Literary Creation in Atonement. Porto das Letras, v. 5, n. 2, p. 58-77, 2019.

GARBER, Marjorie. Shakespeare After All. New York: Anchor Books, 2004.

GRAHAM, Cary B. Standards of Value in The Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1953, pp. 145-151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2866172.

GROSS, K. Shylock is Shakespeare. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226309927.001.0001.

HINELY, J. Bond Priorities in The Merchant of Venice. Studies in English Literature, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1980, pp. 217-239. https://doi.org/10.2307/450170.

KAPLAN, M. L.; BEVINGTON, D. (orgs.). The Merchant of Venice: texts and contexts. New York: Palgrave, 2002

LUDWIG, C. R. Adaptação e Re-Criação de Ricardo III, de Al Pacino. Porto das Letras, Vol. 03, Nº 02. Jul.-dez., 2017.

LUDWIG, C. R. Inwardness and Subjectivity in Early Renaissance. Porto das Letras, Vol. 4, Nº 2. Jul.-dez. p. 134 – 157, 2018.

LUDWIG, C. R. Judgment, Conscience and Shylock’s Bond. Porto das Letras, Vol. 6, Nº 1. Jan.-jun., p. 110-139, 2020.

MAGUIRE, Laurie M. Studying Shakespeare: a guide to the play. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470775929.

MARLOWE, Christopher. The Complete plays. Edited by Frank Romany & Robert Lindsey. London: Penguin, 2003.

MAUS, K. E. Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.

McGINN, Colin. Shakespeare’s Philosophy: Discovering the Meaning behind the Plays. New York: Harper, 2007.

OXFORD DICTIONARY. Sally Wehmeier (Org.). 7th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

SHAKESPEARE, W. Complete Works. Londres: Wordsworth Editions, 2007.

SHAKESPEARE, W. Hamlet. London: Arden, 1997.

SHAKESPEARE, W. Julius Caesar. London: Penguin, 1976.

SHAKESPEARE, W. King Lear. Essex: Longman, 1987.

SHAKESPEARE, W. Macbeth. London: Arden, 1997.

SHAKESPEARE, W. Richard III. New York: Matheun, 1997.

SHAKESPEARE, W. The Merchant of Venice. Londres: Arden, 2010.

SHAPIRO, J. Shakespeare and the Jews. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.

SHERMAN, A. Disowning knowledge of Jessica, or Shylock’s scepticism. Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2004, pp. 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2004.0021.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-11

How to Cite

Ludwig, C. R. (2021). Is The Merchant of Venice a Comedy or a Tragicomedy?. Letras De Hoje, 56(1), e36937. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2021.1.36937

Issue

Section

Free Section