Mediated corruption scandals
A possible typology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2020.2.37878Keywords:
Mediated scandals, Corruption, Media systemAbstract
This essay proposes a possible typology of mediated corruption scandals: market-driven corruption scandals, “custodians of conscience” corruption scandals, politically oriented corruption scandals. This typology is proposed in connection to the different social and political contextual conditions within which scandals develop. Particular attention is placed on the nature and the proceedings of the media system and the journalistic professionalism connected to each type of mediated corruption scandals. The essay insists also on the necessity to go beyond the usual attention that is placed on the western world that addresses most of the studies on corruption scandals: this represents just a minor part of the observable corruption cases. Literature on corruption and on media studies constitutes the basis for this essay.
Downloads
References
Allern, Sigur, and Ester Pollack, eds. 2012. Scandalous. The mediated construction of political scandals in four nordic countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
Altschull, Herbert J. 1995. Agents of power. The media and public policy. White Plans: Longmann.
Bradlee, Ben . 1995. A good life: newspapering and other adventures. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Brunetti, Aymo, and Beatrice Weder. 2003. A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics 87(7–8): 1801–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00186-4 .
Canel, Maria José, and Karen Sanders. 2006. Morality tales: political scandals and journalism in Britain and Spain in the 1990s. Creskill: Hampton Press.
Curran, James, and Myung- Jin Park, eds. 2000. De-westernizing media studies. NewYork: Routledge.
Entman, Robert M. 2012. Scandal and silence: media responses to presidential misconduct. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ettema, James S. ,and Theodore Glasser. 1998. Custodians of conscience: investigative journalism and public virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gerli, Matteo, Marco Mazzoni, and Roberto Mincigrucci. 2018. Constraints and limitations of investigative journalism in Hungary, Italy, Latvia and Romania. European Journal of Communication 33(1): 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117750672 .
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2003. Political competition and the politicization of the state in central eastern europe. Comparative Political Studies 36 (10): 1123 - 1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003257610 .
Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ledeneva, Alena V. 2006. How Russia really works. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Mancini, Paolo. 2018. Introduction. European Journal of Communication 33(1): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323117750696 .
Mancini, Paolo, Marco Mazzoni, Alessio Cornia, and Rita Marchetti. 2016. Representations of corruption in the British, French and Italian press: audience segmentation and the lack of unanimously shared indignation. The International Journal of Press Politics 22(1): 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216674652 .
Siebert, Fred S., Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm. 1956. Four theories of the press. The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Communist Concepts of hat the press should be and do. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Sparks, Colin. 2000. Media theory after the fall of European communism.Why the old models from East and West won’t do anymore. In De-westernizing Media Studies, edited by James Curran and Myung-Jin Park, 35–50. London: Routledge.
Stapenhurst, Rick. (2000). The media’s role in curbing corruption. Washington DC: World Bank Institute.
Stetka, Vaclav and Henrik Ornebring. 2013. Investigative journalism in Central and Eastern Europe: autonomy, business models, and democratic roles. The International Journal of Press Politics, 18(4) 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213495921 .
Thompson, John B. 2000. Political scandals: power and visibility in the media age. Cambridge: Polity.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).