Working memory and proficiency:

an inflectional morpheme processing study with Brazilian-Portuguese English bilinguals

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.16.44153

Palabras clave:

Working Memory, Proficiency, Inflectional Morphology, Second Language Processing

Resumen

This study aimed to delve into the role of working memory and proficiency concerning functional morphology in second language processing. We performed two tasks, an acceptability judgment with memory load and a 2-back, with higher and lower proficiency Brazilian Portuguese-English learners. We measured their proficiency level and investigated their performance in working memory capacity and inflectional morphology processing. The morphemes under investigation were the third-person singular (-s) and the regular past tense (-ed) in grammatical and ungrammatical sentences. Our results indicate that neither working memory nor proficiency influenced their performance. These findings seem related to the allocation of attentional resources since they could not focus on the missing morphemes in the acceptability judgment task.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Bruna Rodrigues Fontoura, UEMG, Passos, Minas Gerais, Brasil

Doctor en Estudios Lingüísticos por la Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Profesor del Departamento de Literatura y Lingüística de la Universidad Estadual de Minas Gerais (UEMG) en Passos, MG, Brasil. Desarrolla investigaciones en el área de psicolingüística del bilingüismo con énfasis en procesamiento y adquisición de L2, memoria de trabajo y repositorios de memoria.

Citas

ALDERSON, J. C. Diagnosing Foreign Language Proficiency: the Interface between Learning and Assessment. London: Continuum, 2005.

AZEVEDO, A. F. Listening Comprehension and Working Memory Capacity in Beginning L2 Learners: an Exploratory Study. 2012. 186 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística e Letras) – Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.

BADDELEY, A. D.; HITCH, G. Working Memory. In: BOWER, G. H. (org.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press, 1974. v. 8. p. 47-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1

BADDELEY, A. D. Working Memory and Language: an Overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, Amsterdam, v. 36, n. 3, p. 189-208, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4

BADDELEY, A. D. Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.

BADDELEY, A. D. Working Memory. Science, New York, v. 255, n. 5044, p. 556-559, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359

CARPENTER, P. A.; JUST, M. A. The Role of Working Memory in Language Comprehension. In: KLAHR, D.; KOTOVSKY, K. (org.). Complex Information Processing: the Impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1989. p. 31-68.

COWAN, N. An Embedded-Processes Model of Working Memory. In: MIYAKE, A.; SHAH, P. (org.). Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 32-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.006

COWAN, N. Evolving Conceptions of Memory Storage, Selective Attention, and their Mutual Constraints Within the Human Information-Processing System. Psychological Bulletin, Washington, v. 104, n. 2, p. 163-191, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163

COWAN, N. The Magical Mystery Four: How is Working Memory Capacity Limited, and Why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 19, n. 1, p. 51-57, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277

FINARDI, K. R. Working Memory Capacity and the Acquisition of a Syntactic Structure in L2 Speech. 2009. 231 f. Tese (Doutorado em Inglês e Literatura Correspondente) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2009.

GATHERCOLE, S. E. Working Memory and Language. In: GASKELL, M. G. (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 757-769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0046

HAN, Z. H. Forty Years Later: Updating the Fossilization Hypothesis. Language Teaching, Cambridge, v. 46, n. 2, p. 133-171, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000511

HAN, Z.-H. Grammatical Morpheme Inadequacy as a Function of Linguistic Relativity: a Longitudinal Study. In: HAN, Z. H.; CADIERNO, T. (org.). Linguistic Relativity in SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 2010. p. 154-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692788-009

HAZNEDAR, B.; SCHWARTZ, B. D. Are There Optional Infinitives in Child L2 Acquisition? In: HUGHES, E.; HUGHES, M.; GREENHILL, A. (org.). Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 1997. p. 257-268.

JENSEN, I. et al. The Bottleneck Hypothesis in L2 Acquisition: L1 Norwegian learners’ Knowledge of Syntax and Morphology in L2 English. Second Language Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 36, n. 1, p. 3-29, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658318825067

JIANG, N. Morphological Insensitivity in Second Language Processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, v. 25, p. 603-634, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001298

JIANG, N. Selective Integration of Linguistic Knowledge in Adult Second Language Learning. Language Learning, Cambridge, v. 57, n. 1, p. 1-33, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00397.x

KANE, M. J. et al. Working Memory, Attention Control, and the N-Back Task: a Question of Construct Validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Washington, v. 33, n. 3, p. 615-622, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615

LARDIERE, D. Case and Tense in the “Fossilized” Steady State. Second Language Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-26, 1998a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898674105303

LARDIERE, D. Dissociating Syntax from Morphology in a Divergent End-State Grammar. Second Language Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 14, n. 4, p. 359-375, 1998b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026765898672500216

LARDIERE, D. Mapping Features to Forms in Second Language Acquisition. In: ARCHIBALD, J. (org.). Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000. p. 102-129.

LARDIERE, D.; SCHWARTZ, B. D. Feature-Marking in the L2 Development of Deverbal Compounds. Journal of Linguistics, Cambridge, v. 33, v. 2, p. 327-353, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226797006518

McDONALD, J. L. Beyond the Critical Period: Processing-Based Explanations for Poor Grammaticality Judgment Performance by Late Second Language Learners. Journal of Memory & Language, Amsterdam, v. 55, n. 3, p. 381-401, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006

McDONALD, J. L. Differences in the Cognitive Demands of Word Order, Plurals, and Subject-Verb Agreement Constructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, New York, v. 15, p. 980-984, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.980

MILLER G. A. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, Washington, v. 63, n. 2, p. 81-97, 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

MOTA, M. B.; BALTAZAR, L. M. O processamento da morfologia flexional na L2: efeitos de frequência, proficiência, controle inibitório e memória de trabalho. Prolíngua, João Pessoa, v. 10, n. 1, p. 134-149, 2015.

NATION, P. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 1990.

OLIVEIRA, C. S. F.; FONTOURA, B. R.; SOUZA, R. A. The Challenges Imposed by L2 Inflectional Morphology: Evidence from Speeded Acceptability Judgment Tasks with Brazilian Portuguese-English Bilinguals. Veredas: Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, São Pedro, v. 24. n. 1, p. 317-339, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-2243.2020.v24.30631

PRÉVOST, P.; WHITE, L. Accounting for Morphological Variation in L2 Acquisition: Truncation or Missing Inflection? In: FRIEDEMANN, M.-A.; RIZZI, L. (org.). The Acquisition of Syntax. London: Longman, 2000a. p. 202-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839899-8

PRÉVOST, P.; WHITE, L. Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in Second Language Acquisition? Evidence from Tense and Agreement. Second Language Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 16, v. 2, p. 103-133, 2000b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800677556046

RANDOM String Generator. In: RANDOM. Dublin, [2023?]. Available at: https://www.random.org/strings/. Accessed on: Nov. 7, 2023.

ROBERTSON, D. Variability in the use of the English Article System by Chinese Learners of English. Second Language Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 16, n. 2, p. 135-172, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/026765800672262975

SALTHOUSE, T. A.; BABCOCK, R. L. Decomposing Adult Age Differences in Working Memory. Developmental Psychology, Washington, v. 27, n. 5, p. 763-776, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763

SALTHOUSE, T. A. Working Memory as a Processing Resource in Cognitive Aging. Developmental Review, Amsterdam, v. 10, n. 1, p. 101-124, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(90)90006-P

SLABAKOVA, R. The Bottleneck of Second Language Acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, Beijing, v. 46, n. 4, p. 543-559, 2014.

SLABAKOVA, R. What is Easy and what is Hard to Acquire in a Second Language? In: BOWLES, M. et al. (org.). Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 2013. p. 280-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.9.04ch1

SOUZA, R. A.; SILVA, J. S. Exploring the Measurement of Vocabulary Size to Differentiate Brazilian Portuguese-English Bilinguals’ Access to Grammatical Knowledge in the L2. Revista Linguística, Rio de Janeiro, v. 11, n. 1, p. 187-204, 2015.

WEN, Z.; MOTA, M. B.; McNEILL, A. Working Memory and SLA: Towards an Integrated Theory. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, Baltimore, v. 23, p. 1-18, 2013.

WHITE, L. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065

Descargas

Publicado

2023-12-15

Cómo citar

Rodrigues Fontoura, B. (2023). Working memory and proficiency: : an inflectional morpheme processing study with Brazilian-Portuguese English bilinguals. Letrônica, 16(1), e44153. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.16.44153

Número

Sección

PSICOLINGUÍSTICA E NEUROLINGUÍSTICA EM INTERFACES

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a