The enunciative arguments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2018.2.30470Keywords:
Argumentation, Enunciation, Tone, Attribution.Abstract
It is on opposition to the notion of representation that the enunciation is usually defined. Our utterances would simultaneously represent the world and would communicate the speaker’s attitude to such representation: the latter could evaluate in terms of truth and falseness (Frege), declare it desirable, threatening (Bally), making use of it to demand, promise, presuppose (Austin) or even conceive it as the thought of other than you (Bally). Ducrot’s theory, as it is known, has opposed to this division and specifically to the hypothesis that it would be possible to isolate, within the meaning of an utterance, a representation of the world totally apart from the speaker's intuitions (Ducrot, 1993). The Theory of Argumentation within Language, followed by the Theory of Semantic Blocks (TSB) came up in order to appraise a positive meaning to Ducrot's refusal. Thus, as it is said by TSB, the contents of our utterances might be intertwines as argumentative threads.
Downloads
References
AUSTIN, J. L. Quand dire, c’est faire, traduction de G. Lane. Paris: Seuil. 1970 (1962).
BALLY, Ch. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Bern: Francke et Verlag, 1944.
BENVENISTE, E. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.
CAREL, M. L’entrelacement argumentatif. Lexique, discours et blocs sémantiques. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2011.
CAREL, M.; DUCROT, O. Mise au point sur la polyphonie. Langue Française, n. 164, p. 33-44, 2009.
CAREL, M.; DUCROT, O. Pour une analyse argumentative globale du sens. Arena Romanistica, n. 14, p. 72-88, 2014.
CAREL, M.; RIBARD. Témoigner en poésie. Poétique, n. 179, p. 39-55, 2016.
CORNULIER, B. Art Poëtique. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon, 1995.
DUCROT, O. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1984.
DUCROT, O. A quoi sert le concept de modalité? In: Dittma r, N.; Reich , A. (Éd.). Modalité et Acquisition des langues. Berlin: Walter de Gruyters, 1993. p. 111-129.
FREGE, G. La pensée. Ecrits logiques et philosophiques. Traduction de Cl. Imbert. Paris: Seuil.
FRENAY, A.; CAREL, M. Périodes argumentatives et complexes discursifs. Studdii de lingvistica. (à paraître).
HEREDIA, J.-M. Les Trophées. Paris: Galimard, 1981 (1892).
KIDA, K. L’anaphore conceptuelle au prisme de la Théorie des Blocs Sémantiques. Discours, n. 19, mis en ligne le 22 décembre 2016. Disponível em: <http://discours.revues.org/9217>. doi: 10.4000/discours.9217
LARR EGUY DE CIVRIEUX, M. La Muse de Sang. Paris: Société Mutuelle d’Edition, 1920.
LESCANO, A. Pour une étude du ton. Langue Française, n. 164, p. 45-60, 2009.
VODOZ, J. Une énonciation "photographique". Le cas d’Aloysius Bertrand. Exposé à la journée d’étude Linguistique et écrit, 3, tenue le 12 juin 2017, à l’EHESS.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
