Linguistic varieties in the educational book Português – linguagens: a sociolinguistic approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2017.1.24974Keywords:
Educational book, Linguistic variation, Teaching, Ideology.Abstract
The educational book (re)produces linguistic ideologies and assumes an important role, as it is used as the main resource in the Portuguese Language teaching. In this work we object to analyze a teaching proposal in the treatment given to the linguistic variation in the Portuguese Educational book Português: Linguagens of the authors William Roberto Cereja and Thereza Cochar Magalhães. In this regard, we attempt to the manner how the linguistic varieties are worked. Thus, we dialogue with the studies of Labov (2008), Tarallo (2005), Hernández Campoy and Almeida (2005), Fernández (1998), Bagno (2008), Lucchesi (2015), Milroy (2011) and Moita Lopes (2013). The analysis reveals that there is still a limitation in the treatment of linguistic varieties, and it focus only on those ones that are used by poor populations. Besides, the teaching proposal comes from the social-linguistic polarizations: the right and the wrong, the cult and the uneducated (the hick) variations. Besides, the educational book focus on the grammatical corruption as a teaching resource used for the teaching of linguistic variation and assumes the pattern norms of the language for, from it, concepting other variations as being irrelevant, vulgar and hick. This treatment (re)produces and makes strong social and linguistic prejudices, once that reproduces, without questions, some paradigms, in a specific manner, it naturalizes the sociolinguistic polarization. It is clear, however, that the ideological force of the standard language might create an image of the elite´s language, one that guarantees the acquisition of symbolic benefits.
Downloads
References
ANTUNES, I. Muito além da gramática: por um ensino de língua sem pedras no caminho. São Paulo: Parábolas, 2007.
BAGNO, M. Nada na língua é por acaso: por uma pedagogia da variação linguística. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2007.
______. Preconceito linguístico: o que é, como se faz. 50. ed., São Paulo: Loyola, 2008. BORTONI-RICARDO, Stella Maris. Nós chegamos na escola e agora? São Paulo: Parábola, 2005.
FERNÁNDEZ, F. M. Principios de Sociolinguística y Sociología del lenguaje. Barcelona: Ariel, 1998.
FARACO, C. A. Norma culta brasileira: desatando alguns nós. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2008.
HERNÁNDEZ, J. M.; ALMEIDA, M. Metodología de la investigación sociolinguística. Granada: Comares, 2005.
LUCCHESI, D. Língua e sociedade partidas: a polarização sociolinguística do Brasil. São Paulo: Contexto, 2015.
LABOV, W. Padrões Sociolinguísticos. São Paulo: Parábolas, 2008.
MILROY, J. Ideologias linguísticas e as consequências da padronização. In: LAGARES, X. C.; BAGNO, M. Políticas da norma e conflitos linguísticos. Tradução de Marcos Bagno. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2011. p. 49-87.
MOITA LOPES, Luiz Paulo. Ideologia linguística: como construir discursivamente o português no século XXI. In: MOITA LOPES, L. P.
(Org.). Português no século XXI: cenário geopolítico e sociolinguístico. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2013. p. 18-52.
TARALLO, F. Pesquisa sociolinguística. 8. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.