Prosodic Focus and Clefting in ellipsis sentences processing in Brazilian Portuguese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2023.1.44425Keywords:
Sentence Processing, Ellipsis, Prosodic Focus, Clefting.Abstract
This research investigates the influence of prosodic focus and sytanctic clefting in the processing of ambiguous replacive ellipsis sentences in Brazilian Portuguese, such as “In orchestral rehearsal, (it was) the violinist (who) impressed the maestro during the first song, not the soloist”. Our research was inspired by Carlson (2015) who investigated similar ellipsis sentences in English. We conducted two auditory experiments, manipulating prosody and clefting in 7 conditions. After listening to the audio, participants (N=66) read a question (“What happened in...?”) and they chose an answer: a subject interpretation response (“The soloist impressed nobody”), or an object interpretation response (“Nobody impressed the soloist”). The results indicate that both strategies of focalization (i.e., clefting and prosody) increased subject interpretation choices. When the focus cues were conflicting, the clefting structure played a decisive role in the final interpretation. Our results are aligned with Carlson (2015), which point that prosodic focus plays an important role in the ambiguity resolution (see Schafer et. al, 1996). However, as it was observed by Kiss (1998), the clefting structure conveys an exhaustive contrastive focus on the sentence, being more effective in the disambiguation process than other cues.
Downloads
References
ARIEL, Mira. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Lon¬don: Routledge, 1990.
BAAYEN, Rolf Harald; DAVIDSON, Doug; BATES, Dou¬glas. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, [s. l.], v. 59, n. 4, p. 390-412, 2008.
CARLSON, Katy. Clefting, parallelism, and focus in ellipsis sentences. In: FRAZIER, Lyn; GIBSON, Edward (ed.). Explicit and implicit prosody in sentence proces¬sing: studies in honor of Janet Dean Fodor. New York: Springer, 2015. p. 63-83.
CARLSON, Katy. Parallelism and prosody in the proces¬sing of ellipsis sentences. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2002. (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics).
CARLSON, Katy; TYLER, Joseph. Accents, not just prosodic boundaries, influence syntactic attachment. Language and Speech, [s. l.], v. 61, n. 2, p. 246-276, 2018.
CRAENENBROECK, Jeroen van; TEMMERMAN, Tanja (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
FONSECA, Aline Alves. Pesquisa em psicolinguística: explorando o processamento de frases. In: OLIVEIRA, Candido Samuel Fonseca; SÁ, Thaís Maira Machado (org.). Psicolinguística em Minas Gerais. Contagem: CEFET-MG, 2020. p. 95-112.
FONSECA, Aline Alves; CARLSON, Katy; SILVA, An¬dressa. Prosodic effects on attachment in Brazilian Portuguese. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 32., 2019, Boulder. [Poster]. Disponível em: www.colorado.edu/event/cuny2019/sites/default/files/attached-files/a7_fon-seca_etal.pdf. Acesso em: 11 set. 2023.
FORSTER, Kenneth; FORSTER, Jonathan. DMDX: a Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, [s. l.], v. 35, p. 116-124, 2003.
FRAZIER, Lyn. On comprehending sentences: syntactic parsing strategies. 1979. Thesis (PhD) – University of Connecticut, Storrs, 1979.
FRAZIER, Lyn; FODOR, Janet Dean. The sausage ma¬chine: a new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, [s. l.], v. 6, n. 4, p. 291-325, 1978.
GANDÓN-CHAPELA, Evelyn; PÉREZ-GUERRA, Javier. Ellipsis: licensing, structure and identity. The Linguistic Review, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 445-452, 2016.
GORDON, Peter; HENDRICK, Randall; JOHNSON, Mar¬cus. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, [s. l.], v. 27, n. 6, p. 1411-1423, 2001.
HOEKS, John; REDEKER, Gisela; HENDRIKS, Petra. Fill the gap! Combining pragmatic and prosodic. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, [s. l.], v. 38, n. 3, p. 221-235, 2009.
KISS, Katalin. Identificational focus vs. information focus. Language, [s. l.], v. 74, n. 2, p. 245-273, 1998.
MERCHANT, Jason. Ellipsis: a survey of analytical appro¬aches. In: CRAENENBROECK, Jeroen van; TEMMERMAN, Tanja (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 19-45.
NESPOR, Marina; VOGEL, Irene. Prosodic phonology. Foris: Dordrecht, 1986.
PHILIPS, Colin; PARKER, Dan. The psycholinguistics of ellipsis. Lingua, [s. l.], v. 151, p. 78-95, 2014.
PSYCHOLOGY SOFTWARE TOOLS. E-Prime 3.0. PST Product Service and Support, [s. l.], 2016. Disponível em: https://support.pstnet.com/. Acesso em: 9 set. 2023.
R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statis¬tical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/. Acesso em: 9 set. 2023.
ROOTH, Mats. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, Amsterdam, v. 1, n. 1, p. 75-116, 1992.
SCHAFER, Amy et al. Focus in relative clause construal. Language & Cognitive Processes, [s. l.], v. 11, n. 1-2, p. 135-164, 1996.
WARREN, Paul. Introducing Psycholinguistics. Cambri¬dge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
WARREN, Tessa; GIBSON, Edward. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cog¬nition, [s. l.], v. 85, n. 1, p. 79-112, 2002.
WINKLER, Susanne. Ellipsis. In: BROWN, Keith (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. 2. ed. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. p. 109-113.
ZEHR, Jérémy; SCHWARZ, Florian. PennController for Internet Based Experiments (IBEX). OSF, [s. l.], 15 mar. 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MD832. Acesso em: 2 jan. 2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Letrônica
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letrônica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letrônica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.