From the colonial cradle to non-linear dynamics

The awakening of speech perception in phonology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2022.1.42641

Keywords:

phonology, speech perception, complexity

Abstract

Although we know speech perception plays a central role in language development, its adoption in the phonological theory has faced theoretical and methodological-technological resistance. However, interest in the area has increased for two main reasons: technological advances in speech sciences and the attempts to incorporate perceptual principles into traditional phonological models. In this article, we advocate that the late awakening of speech perception in phonology is related to its colonial cradle and to the way in which some Cartesian linguistic theories/models see and validate the individual and the individual acts, and, consequently, speech production and perception, constructs that in classical models of phonology do not fit in the definitions of language. The marginalization of perception is related to the “epistemicide” (SANTOS, 2019, p. 28) caused by hegemonic scientific (linguistic) paradigms supported by the privileged modern science. Thus, in this work, we seek to decolonize phonology, based on a scientific proposal grounded in Complexity, bringing to light a critical interpretation of the langue-parole dichotomy. In the perspective adopted in this text, the phonological grammar is guided by individual surface actions, and the perception of its phonic units becomes essential in order for it to be instantiated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Reiner Vinicius Perozzo, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Doutor em Letras pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Professor no Departamento de Línguas Modernas do Instituto de Letras da mesma universidade.

Felipe Flores Kupske, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Doutor em Letras pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Professor do Departamento de Línguas Modernas da UFRGS e professor permanente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Língua e Cultura (PPGLinC) da Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), em Salvador, BA, Brasil. Líder do Laboratório de Ciências da Fala (LAFALA).

References

ALBANO, E. O gesto e suas bordas: esboço de fonologia acústico-articulatória do português brasileiro. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2001.

ALBANO, E. O tear encantado: tecnologia, complexidade e imaginário interdisciplinar sobre a linguagem. Remate de Males, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 1, p. 41-57, 2009. Dossiê Tecnologia das Letras. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/remate.v29i1.8636287

ALBANO, E. O gesto audível: fonologia como pragmática. São Paulo: Cortez, 2020.

ASHBY, M.; MAIDMENT, J. Introducing phonetic science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808852

BECKNER, C.; BLYTHE, R.; BYBEE, J.; CHRISTIANSEN, M. H.; CROFT, W.; ELLIS, N. C.; HOLLAND, J.; KE, J.; LARSEN-FREEMAN, D.; SCHOENEMANN, T. Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Language Learning, [S. l.], v. 59, p. 1-26, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x

BERTICELLI, I. Educação em perspectivas epistemológicas pós-modernas. Chapecó: Editora Argos, 2010.

BOERSMA, P; WEENINK, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (programa computacional, versão 6.2.05). [S. l.]: Praat, 2022. Disponível em: http://www.praat.org. Acesso em: 2022.

BRESCANCINI, C.; GOMES, C. Fonética versus Fonologia? Letras de Hoje, Porto Alegre, v. 49, p. 5-10, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2014.1.17283

BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology, [S. l.], v. 3, p. 219-252, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000658

BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, [S. l.], v. 6, p. 201-251, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700001019

BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, [S. l.], v. 49, p. 155-180, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913

BROWMAN, C.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Dynamics and articulatory phonology. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, [S. l.], SR-113, p. 51-62, 1993.

BYBEE, J. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612886

BYBEE, J. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526

CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009

CHOMSKY, N.; HALLE, M. The sound pattern of English. Nova Iorque: Harper and Row, 1968.

CILLIERS, P. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203012253

COELHO, O.; FINBOW, T. Apontamentos para uma história linguística transatlântica e descolonizada do português no Brasil: o contato e a diversidade em foco. In: VIEIRA, F. E.; BAGNO, M. (org.). História das línguas, histórias da linguística: homenagem a Carlos Alberto Faraco. São Paulo: Parábola, 2020. p. 61-84.

COHN, A. Phonetics in phonology and phonology in phonetics. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, [S. l.], v. 16, p. 1-31, 2007.

CRISTÓFARO-SILVA, T.; GOMES, C. Fonologia na perspectiva dos modelos de exemplares. In: GOMES, C. (org.). Fonologia na perspectiva dos modelos de exemplares. São Paulo: Contexto, 2020. p. 13-36.

DE BOT, K.; LOWIE, W.; VERSPOOR, M. Introduction. In: VERSPOOR, M.; DE BOT, K.; LOWIE, W. (org.). A dynamic approach to second language development: methods and techniques. Amsterdã: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2011. p. 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.00toc

FERREIRA-GONÇALVES, G.; KUPSKE, F. Um caso de opacidade fonológica na aquisição do PB: um problema ótimo ou uma questão exemplar? Leitura: Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras (UFAL), [S. l.], v. 2, p. 125-148, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28998/0103-6858.2010v2n46p125-148

FOWLER, C. Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing control. Journal of Phonetics, [S. l.], v. 8, p. 113-133, 1980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31446-9

FOWLER, C. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, v. 14, p. 3-28, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30607-2

GOLDSTEIN, L.; FOWLER, C. Articulatory phonology: a phonology for public language use. In: MEYER, A.; SCHILLER, N. (org.). Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities. Berlim: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003. p. 159-207.

HAUGEN, E. The ecology of language. In: FILL, A; MÜHLHÄUSLER, P. (org.). The ecolinguistics reader. Londres: Continuum, 2001. p. 57-66.

HAYES, B. Phonetically driven phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and inductive grounding. In: DARNELL, M.; MORAVCSIK, E.; NOONAN, M.; NEWMEYER, F.; WHEATLEY, K. (org.). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics: Volume I: General papers. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 243-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.41.13hay

HAYES, B.; STERIADE, D. Introduction: The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In: HAYES, B.; KIRCHNER, R.; STERIADE, D. (org.). Phonetically based phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. p. 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486401.001

HORN, J. Human research and Complexity Theory. Educational philosophy and theory, [S. l.], v. 40, n.1, p. 130-143, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00395.x

HUME, E.; JOHNSON, K. The role of speech perception in phonology. São Diego: Academic Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454095

JOOS, M. Acoustic phonetics. Language, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 2, 1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/522229

KEATING, P. The phonology-phonetics interface. In: NEWMEYER, F. (org.). The Cambridge linguistic survey: Linguistic theory: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p. 281-302.

KENT, R.; READ, C. The acoustic analysis of speech. Londres: Cengage Learning, 1992.

KINGSTON, J. The phonetics-phonology interface. In: LACY, P. (org.). The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 401-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486371.018

KUPSKE, F. A complex approach on integrated late bilinguals’ English VOT production: a study on South Brazilian immigrants in London. Ilha do Desterro, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 3, p. 81-93, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8026.2017v70n3p81

KUPSKE, F. Destabilizing effects of L2 explicit pronunciation instruction on L1 speech: Voice Onset Time production by Brazilian intermediate users of English. Gradus: Revista Brasileira de Fonologia de Laboratório, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 32-49, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47627/gradus.v6i2.174

KUPSKE, F.; PEROZZO, R.; ALVES, U. Sound change as a Complex Dynamic phenomenon and the blurriness of grammar stability. Macabéa: Revista Eletrônica do Netlli, v. 8, n. 2, p. 158-172, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47295/mren.v8i2.1966

LADD, R. Phonetics in phonology. In: GOLDSMITH, J.; RIGGLE, J.; YU, A. (org.). Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2011. p. 348-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343069.ch11

LADEFOGED, P. A Course in Phonetics. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 2001.

LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. Complexity theory: a new way to think. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 363-373, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-63982013000200002

LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. Complexity theory: the lessons continue. In: ORTEGA, L.; HAN, Z. (org.). Complexity theory and language development: in celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman. Amsterdã: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. p. 11-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.02lar

LEGENDRE, G.; MIYATA, Y.; SMOLENSKY, P. Can connectionism contribute to syntax? Harmonic Grammar, with an application. In: ZIOLKOWSKI, M.; NOSKE, M.; DEATON, K. (org.). Proceedings of the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1990.

LIMA JR., R.; ALVES, U.; KUPSKE, F. Introdução a pesquisas de sons não nativos. In: KUPSKE, F.; ALVES, U.; LIMA JR., R. (org.). Investigando os sons de línguas não nativas: uma introdução. Campinas: Editora da Abralin, 2021. p. 15-40.

LISKER, L.; ABRAMSON, A. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 3, p. 384-422, 1964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830

MORIN, E. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.

MORIN, E. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. São Paulo: Sulina, 2015.

PEROZZO, R. Sobre as esferas cognitiva, acústico-articulatória e realista indireta da percepção fônica não-nativa: Para além do PAM-L2. 2017. 225 f. Tese (Doutorado em Estudos da Linguagem) — Instituto de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2017.

PEROZZO, R.; KUPSKE, F. Speech perception and production as constructs of action: Implications for models of L2 development. Revista X, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 5, p. 1231-1257, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rvx.v16i5.81296

PIERREHUMBERT, J. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In: BYBEE, J.; HOPPER, H. (org.). Frequency effects and the emergence of lexical structure. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 2001. p. 137-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie

PIERREHUMBERT, J. Probabilistic Phonology: Discrimination and Robustness. In: BOD, R.; HAY, J.; JANNEDY, S. (org.). Probability Theory in Linguistics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003. p. 177-228.

PIERREHUMBERT, J. Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics, [S. l.], v. 2, p. 33-52, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030514-125050

PRINCE, A.; SMOLENSKY, P. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report RuCCSTR-2. [S. l.]: Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, 1993.

RAUBER, A; RATO, A; KLUGE, D; SANTOS, G; FIGUEIREDO, M. TP: Teste de percepção (programa computacional). [S. l.]: Worken, c2009. Disponível em: www.worken. com.br/tp_regfree.php. Acesso em: 2022.

SANTOS, B. O fim do império cognitivo: a afirmação das epistemologias do sul. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 2019.

SAUSSURE, F. Curso de Linguística Geral. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006.

SILVA, J.; CARDOSO, R.; KUPSKE, F. Desenvolvimento linguístico e diferenças individuais: uma discussão dinâmico complexa sobre a generalização de dados. In: ALMEIDA, A.; BATISTA, A.; KUPSKE, F. F.; ZOGHBI, D. (org.). Língua em movimento: Estudos em linguagem e interação. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2020. p. 309-326.

STEWART, I. Em busca do infinito: uma história da matemática dos primeiros números à teoria do caos. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2014.

TRUBETSKOY, N. Principes de phonologie. Paris: Klincksieck, 1949.

UBEROI, J. Science and Culture. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1978.

Published

2022-12-20

How to Cite

Perozzo, R. V., & Kupske, F. F. (2022). From the colonial cradle to non-linear dynamics: The awakening of speech perception in phonology. Letrônica, 15(1), e42641. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2022.1.42641

Issue

Section

Fonologia e Interfaces