Methodological challenges in developing a database for studies of political elites

The case of the Brazilian “Heads” of Congress

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2022.1.42128

Keywords:

Database, Methodological issues, Federal Deputies, Research design, “Heads” of Congress

Abstract

The object of this research is the development of a database made up of federal deputies classified by the Intersyndical Department of Parliamentary Assistance (DIAP) from 1999 to 2020. We have presented the making process of the database and its methodological challenges, aiming: (a) to present how DIAP operationalizes the awarding of the “Heads of the Congress”; (b) to point out the inconsistencies found in the publications of the series; and (c) to show the relevance of the variables collected in this database for the understanding of political careers and the professionalization of its actors. The information has been collected through the database of the Observatory of Political and Social Elites of Brazil, the portal of the House of Representatives, and the websites of the Superior Electoral Court and DIAP. While developing the database, inconsistencies were identified in the series of the “Heads of Congress”. At times, the attribution of the outstanding categories of parliamentarians diverged within the same publication. The conceptualization and the classification process of the categories analyzed also restrict the research because they are not well delimited and explained in the document. The proposed structure allows us to understand the steps and the characteristics of a database. This mastery provides good practices in the construction and collection of information for political scientists, reducing divergences and potential problems that could compromise the result of the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Gabryela Gabriel, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.

Mestranda em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), em Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Bolsista da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Paula Portela, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.

Mestranda em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), em Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Bolsista da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Pedro Henrique Beff, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.

Mestrando em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), em Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Bolsista da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Nilton Sainz, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil.

Doutorando em Ciência Política pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), em Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Bolsista da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

References

Allen, Peter, and Philip Cowley. 2018. “The rise of the professional politician?.” In Exploring Parliament, edited by C. Leston-Bandeira and L. Thompson, 221–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Allen, Nicholas, Gabriele Magni, Donald Searing, and Philip Warncke. 2020. What is a career politician? Theories, concepts and measures. European Political Science Review 12, 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773920000077

Becker, Howard S. 2008. Tabelas de Verdade, combinações e tipos. In Segredos e Truques da Pesquisa, 177-226. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

Borchert, Jens. 2003. “Professional politicians: towards a comparative perspective”. In The Political Class in Advanced Democracies: A Comparative Perspective, edited by J. Borchert and J. Zeiss, 1–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Codato, Adriano. 2015. Metodologias para identificação das elites: três exemplos clássicos. In Como estudar elites, edited by R. Perissinotto and A. Codato, 15-32. Curitiba: Editora UFPR.

Collier, David, Jody LaPorte, and Jason Seawright. 2012. Putting typologies to work: concept formation, measurement and analytic rigor. Political Research Quartely 65 (1): 217-232. http://polisci.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/people/u3827/PuttingTypologiesAppendixandArticle_0.pdf

Costa, Luiz Domingos, Lucas Massimo, Paula Butture, and Ana Lopes. 2015. O desenho e as fontes da pesquisa com elites parlamentares brasileiras no século XX. In Como estudar elites, edited by R. Perissinotto and A. Codato, 63-92. Curitiba: UFPR.

Cotta, Maurizio, and Heinrich Best. 2000. Between professionalization and democratization: A synoptic view on the making of the European representative. In Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848-2000. Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries, edited by H. Best & M. Cotta, 493–526. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

DIAP. 2020. Os “Cabeças” do Congresso Nacional: uma pesquisa sobre os 100 parlamentares mais influentes. 27. ed. Brasília: Departamento Intersindical de Assessoria Parlamentar – DIAP.

Hunter, Floyd. 1953. Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F. 1937. Some Remarks on Typological Procedures in Social Research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6: 119-139.

Messenberg, Débora. 2007. A elite parlamentar brasileira (1989-2004). Sociedade e Estado 22 (2): 309-370.

Mills, Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

Published

2022-08-09

How to Cite

Gabriel, G., Portela, P., Beff, P. H., & Sainz, N. (2022). Methodological challenges in developing a database for studies of political elites: The case of the Brazilian “Heads” of Congress. Conversas & Controvérsias, 9(1), e42128. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2022.1.42128

Issue

Section

Dossier – Sociology of political elites