Division of labour in Durkheim, Marx and Honneth: contributions to a political economy of recognition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.31068Keywords:
Division of labour, Émile Durkheim, Karl Marx, Axel Honneth, Recognition.Abstract
This paper presents a discussion on how the concept of the division of labour within society appears in the work of Émile Durkheim, of Karl Marx, and of Axel Honneth. Historically, that notion has been related to Durkheim’s De la division du travail social, but it was also a subject to which Marx and, more recently, Honneth directed their attention. In highlighting how those three authors conceptualise the division of labour, this paper intents to show that all of them, with their respective particularities, conceive modern societies as a normative order based on the principle of mutual recognition, which for its part is expressed in the historical process of the division of labour.Downloads
References
BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Durkheim’s society revisited. In: Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip Smith (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2005. p. 360-382 <10.1017/CCOL9780521806725>.
BRUDNEY, Daniel. Marx’s attempt to leave philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. Historical objections to the centrality of work.
Constellations, v. 22, n. 1, 2015, p. 105-121. <10.1111/1467-8675.12141>.
DERANTY, Jean-Philippe. A Teoria Crítica entre Marx e Honneth. Civitas, v. 18, n. 3, 2018 <10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.32249>
DURKHEIM, Émile. As regras do método sociológico, 3. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.
DURKHEIM, Émile. Da divisão do trabalho social. 4. ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2010.
DURKHEIM, Émile. Lições de sociologia. 2. ed. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2016a.
DURKHEIM, Émile. O individualismo e os intelectuais. São Paulo: Edusp, 2016b.
HERZOG, Lisa. Inventing the market. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
HERZOG, Lisa. Teoria do reconhecimento e democracia econômica: potenciais não exauridos. Civitas, v. 18, n. 3, 2018 <10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.29550>.
HONNETH, Axel. The fragmented world of the social. Essays in social and political phylosophy. Albany: Suny Press, 1995.
HONNETH, Axel. Trabalho e reconhecimento. Tentativa de uma redefinição. Civitas, v. 8, n. 1, p. 46-67, 2008 <10.15448/1984-7289.2008.1.4321>.
HONNETH, Axel. Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2011.
HONNETH, Axel. Die Moral im “Kapital”. Versuch einer Korrektur der Marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Rahel Jaeggi und Daniel Loick (eds.), Nach Marx. Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2013. p. 350-363 [A moral em O capital: tentativa de uma correção da crítica marxista da economia. Civitas, v. 18, n. 3, 2018 <10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.32248>].
HONNETH, Axel. Die Idee des Sozialismus. Versuch einer Aktualisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015.
LOHMANN, Georg. Indifferenz und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.
MARX, Karl. Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band. Buch I: Der Produktionsprozess des Kapitals. Karl Marx; Freidrich Engels. Werke. Band 23. Berlin: Dietz, 1962[1890].
MARX, Karl. Auszüge aus James Mills Buch “Éléments d’économie politique”. Karl Marx; Friedrich Engels, Werke, Ergänzungsband. Schriften bis 1844, Erster Teil. Berlin: Dietz, 1968.
MARX, Karl. Das Elend der Philosophie. Antwort auf Proudhons „Philosophie des Elends“. Karl Marx; Friedrich Engels, Werke, Band 4, Berlin: Dietz, 1977.
MARX, Karl. Ktitik des Gothaers Programms. Karl Marx; Friedrich Engels, Werke, Band 19, Berlin: Dietz, 1987.
MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Manifest der kommunistischen Partei. Karl Marx; Friedrich Engels, Werke, Band 4, Berlin: Dietz, 1977.
MARX, Karl; ENGELS, Friedrich. Die deutsche Ideologie. Kritik der neuesten deutschen Philosophie in ihren Räpresentanten Feuerbach, B. Bauer und Stirner, und des deutschen Sozialismus in seinen verschiedenen Propheten. Karl Marx; Friedrich Engels. Werke. Band 3, Berlin: Dietz, 1978 [1845-6].
MÜLLER, Hans-Peter. Social structure and civil religion: legitimation crisis in a late Durkheimian perspective. In: Jeffrey C. Alexander (org.). Durkheimian sociology: cultural studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1988. p. 129-158.
ORTIZ, Renato. Durkheim: arquiteto e herói fundador. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 4, n. 11, p. 5-22, 1989.
ROBERTS, William Clare. Marx’s inferno. The political theory of capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).