Criticism and normativity: considerations about political solidarity and participatory budgeting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2018.3.26798Keywords:
Critical theory, Public sphere, Participatory budgeting.Abstract
The political philosophy and the social philosophy have recently been confronted with normative challenges that require significant efforts in trying to respond them. Among them one is the vertiginous process of depoliticisation of the public sphere. It undermines the social life. From the point of view of critical research it is necessary to propose answers to this problem. Based on critical and reflexive thinking, this article aims to make explicit the solidarity social action of participatory budgeting as possibility to solve the depoliticisation of public sphere. In this sense, the project of deliberative budgeting can contribute to society through repoliticizing action in the public sphere insofar as it functions as a social-normative medium in the society.
Downloads
References
AGAMBEN, Giorgio. La chiesa e il regno. Roma: Nottetempo, 2010.
ALLEN, Amy. The end of progress: decolonizing the normative foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016 <10.7312/alle17324>.
ASSAI, José Henrique Sousa. De “Leiden an Unbestimmtheit” à “Erfolg an
Bestimmtheit”: um caminho possível da reconstrução normativa honnethiana? Griot, v. 11, n. 1, p. 226-244, 2015a.
ASSAI, José Henrique Sousa. Solidariedade como pressuposto de uma ontologia social: investigação possível para uma Teoria Crítica? In: Agemir Bavaresco; Francisco Jozivan Lima; José Henrique Sousa Assai (orgs.). Estudos de filosofia social e política: justiça e reconhecimento. Porto Alegre: Editora Fi, 2015b. p. 153-189.
AUDARD, Catherine. Cidadania e democracia deliberativa. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs, 2006.
AVRITZER, Leonardo. Teoria democrática, esfera pública e participação local. Sociologias, v. 1, n. 2, p. 18-43, 1999.
AVRITZER, Leonardo. Instituições participativas e desenho institucional: algumas considerações sobre a variação da participação no Brasil democrático. Opinião Pública, v. 14, n. 1, p. 43-64, 2008 <10.1590/S0104-62762008000100002>.
BRUNKHORST, Hauke. Critical theory of legal revolutions: evolutionary
perspectives. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
FIALA, Andrew. The Bloomsbury companion to political philosophy. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing Ple., 2015.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns: zur Kritik der
funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995a.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Erläuterungen zum Begriff des kommunikativen Handelns. In: Jürgen Habermas. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995b. p. 571-606.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997. 2 v.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Ach, Europa: kleine politische Schriften. v. 11. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2008.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Im Sog der Technokratie: kleine politische Schriften. v. 14. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2013.
HELFER, Inácio. Os bens sociais são sempre bens convergentes? Trans/Form/Ação, v. 35, n. 2, p. 163-186, 2012 <10.1590/S0101-31732012000200009>.
JAEGGI, Rahel. Solidarity and indifference. In: Ruud ter Meulen; Will Arts; Ruud Muffels (orgs.). Solidarity in health and social care in Europa. Dordrecht: Springer, 2001. p. 287-308.
JAEGGI, Rahel. Repensando a ideologia. Civitas, v. 8, n. 1, p. 137-165, 2008 <10.15448/1984-7289.2008.1.4326>.
JAEGGI, Rahel. Was ist eine (gute) Institution? In: Rainer Forst; Martin Hartmann; Rahel Jaeggi; Martin Saar (orgs.). Sozialphilosophie und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2009. p. 528-544.
JAEGGI, Rahel. Kritik von Lebensformen. 2. ed. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014.
JAEGGI, Rahel; LOICK, Daniel (orgs.). Nach Marx: Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis. 2. ed. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014.
JAEGGI, Rahel; WESCHE, Tilo (orgs.). Was ist Kritik? 3. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2013.
JAEGGI, Rahel; CELIKATES, Robin. Sozialphilosophie: eine Einführung. München: C. H. Beck, 2017.
LUBENOW, Jorge Adriano. Esfera pública e democracia deliberativa em Habermas: modelo teórico e discursos práticos. Kriterion, v. 51, n. 121, p. 227-258, 2010 <10.1590/S0100-512X2010000100012>.
LUBENOW, Jorge Adriano. O que há de político na Teoria da Ação Comunicativa? Sobre o déficit de institucionalização em Jürgen Habermas. Philósophos, v. 18, n. 1, p. 157-190, 2013.
PETTIT, Phillip Pettit; GOODIN, Robert; POGGE, Thomas. A companion to
contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.
SÁNCHEZ, Félix. Orçamento Participativo: teoria e prática. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
SCHOLZ, Sally J. Political solidarity. Pennsylvania: University Press, 2008.
STAHL, Titus. Ideologiekritik als Kritik sozialer Praktiken. In: Rahel Jaeggi; Daniel Loick (orgs.). Nach Marx: Philosophie, Kritik, Praxis. 2. ed. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2014. p. 228-254.
TAYLOR, Charles. Argumentos filosóficos. São Paulo: Loyola, 2000.
WALZER, Michael. Gesellschaftskritik und Gesellschaftstheorie. In: Rainer Forst; Martin Hartmann; Rahel Jaeggi; Martin Saar (orgs.). Sozialphilosophie und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2009. p. 588-607.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).
