Truth commissions and transitional justice: problems of deliberative moral foundations for think about serious human rights violations against massive numbers of people
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-864X.2019.3.33737Keywords:
Truth commissions. Transitional justice. Deliberative democracy.Abstract
This paper presents Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson’s theory on the moral foundations of truth commissions, analyzing it from the perspective of the relation between the normativity of transitional justice and deliberative theories of democracy. I will argue that democratic deliberative requirements, however defensible they may be from the point of view of democracy and justice, and despite having theoretical virtues, are not adequate to think of transitional contexts for democracy dealing with legacies of gross human rights violations.
Downloads
References
ASSUMPÇÃO, S. R. Comissão Nacional da Verdade: modo de usar. Insight Inteligência, Rio de Janeiro, n. 69, p. 114-127, 2015.
BUARQUE DE HOLLANDA, C. 2018. Direitos humanos e democracia: a experiência das comissões da verdade no Brasil. RBCS, São Paulo, v. 36, n. 96, p. 2-18, 2018.
DU TOIT, A. The moral foundations of the South African TRC: truth as acknoledgment and justice as recognition. In: ROTBERG, R.; THOMPSON, D. (org.). Truth v. justice: the morality of truth commissions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000. p. 122-140.
FREEMAN, S. Justice and the social contract: essas on Rawlsian political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
GUTMANN, A.; THOMPSON, D. Democracy and disagreement. Boston: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996.
GUTMANN, A.; THOMPSON, D. The moral foundations of truth commissions. In: ROTBERG, R.; THOMPSON, D. (org.). Truth v. justice: the morality of truth commissions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000. p. 22-44.
HONNETH, A. Teoria crítica. In: GIDDENS, A.; TURNER, J. (org.). Teoria social hoje. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP, 1999. p. 503-552.
MELO, R. Teoria política e pesquisa social. Lua Nova, São Paulo, v. 102, p. 211-230, 2017.
RORTY, R. 1993. Human rights, rationality, and sentimentality. In: SHUTE, S.; HURLEY, S. (org.). On human rights. The Oxford Amnesty Lectures. New York: Basic Books, 111-134.
ROTBERG, R. Truth commissions and the provision of truth, justice, and reconciliation. In: ROTBERG, R.; THOMPSON, D. (org.). Truth v. justice: the morality of truth commissions. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000. p. 3-21.
SARTORI, G. Philosophy, Theory and Science of Politics. Political Theory, v. 2 n. 2, p. 133-162, 1974.
SHUE, H. Basic rights: subsistency, affluence, and U.S. 2. ed. foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
VALENTINI, L. Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: a conceptual map. Philosophy Compass, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 9, p. 654-664, 2012.
WARREN, M. What is polítical theory/philosophy? Political Science and Politics, Washington, v. 22, n. 3, p. 606-612, 1989.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 San Romanelli Assumpção
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Estudos Ibero-Americanos implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Estudos Ibero-Americanos as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.