Patriarcado e interseccionalidade:  o público e o privado como ponto de convergência teórica

Isadora Vianna  Sento-Sé

doi:10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.44778

Authors

Isadora Vianna Sento-Sé Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-5969

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2024.1.44778

Keywords:

Patriarchy, Intersectionality, Feminism, Public and private

Abstract

The paper discusses the importance of the public and private domains in feminist analysis, highlighting the presence of the dichotomy between these spheres in theories of patriarchy and intersectionality. The separation between the public and the private has historical roots and is related to the oppression of women in the private sphere and their exclusion from the public sphere. The exclusion of women from traditional political theory and the invisibility of their gender identities are critiqued, pointing to the importance of recognizing the influence of gender in the public sphere and the economy. The opposition between public and private is explored in feminist studies and permeates the theories of patriarchy and intersectionality, expressed here by the writings of Pateman, Okin, Fraser, Walby, Hill Collins, Crenshaw, Davis and Bilge; highlighting the potential for complementarity between both theoretical currents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Isadora Vianna Sento-Sé, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

PhD and master in Social Sciences from the State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), in Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil and post-doctoral student in the Postgraduate Program in Sociology and Anthropology at the same institution.

References

Beauvoir, Simone. 2014.O segundo sexo. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.

Bilge, Sirma. 2013. Intersectionality undone: saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies 1. Du Bois review: social science research on race 10 (2): 405-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000283

Collins, Patricia H. 1998. It’s all in the family: intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia 13 (3): 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x

Collins, Patricia H. 2015. Em direção a uma nova visão: raça, classe e gênero como categorias de análise e conexão. In Reflexões e práticas de transformação feminista, organizado por Renata Moreno, 13-42. São Paulo: SOF

Crenshaw, Kimberlé W. 2013. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence, organizado por Martha Albertson Fineman e Roxane Mykitiuk, 93-118. New York: Routledge.

Davis, Angela. 2016. Mulheres, raça e classe. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.

Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public man, private woman: women in social and political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691215952

Few-Demo, April L, e Katherine R. Allen. 2020. Gender, feminist, and intersectional perspectives on families: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family 82 (1): 326-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12638

Fraser, Nancy. 1993. Beyond the master/subject model: reflections on Carole Pateman’s sexual contract. Social Text 37: 173-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/466266 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/466266

Hartmann, Heidi. 1976. Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex. Signs: Journal of women in Culture and Society 1 (3) 2: 137-69. https://doi.org/10.1086/493283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/493283

Hobbes, Thomas. 2013. Elements of law, natural and political. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315034430

Kantola, Johanna, e Emanuela Lombardo.2017. Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: politics, institutions and intersectionality. Berlim: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50778-1

Locke, John. 2019. Dois tratados do governo civil. Alfragide: Leya.

Miguel, Luis Felipe. 2016. Carole Pateman e a crítica feminista do contrato. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 32 (93): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.17666/329303/2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17666/329303/2017

Okin, Susan M. 2008. Gênero, o público e o privado. Revista Estudos Feministas 16 (2): 305-32. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2008000200002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-026X2008000200002

Okin, Susan M. 2014. Justice, gender, and the family. In Justice, Politics, and the Family, organizado por Daniel Engster e Tamara Metz, 63-87. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315633794-7

Pateman, Carole. 1993. O contrato sexual. 1993. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 2020. Discurso sobre a origem e os fundamentos da desigualdade entre os homens. Alfragide: Leya.

Saffioti, Heleieth I.B. 1999.Primórdios do conceito de gênero. Cadernos Pagu 12: 157-63.

Saffioti, Heleieth I. B. 2015. Gênero, patriarcado, violência. São Paulo: Expressão Popular.

Segato, Rita Laura. 2003. Las estructuras elementales de la violencia: ensayos sobre género entre la antropología, el psicoanálisis y los derechos humanos. Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.

Walby, Sylvia. 1989. Theorising patriarchy. Sociology 23 (2): 213-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023002004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023002004

Walby, Sylvia. 2007. Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the social sciences 37 (4): 449-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839310730766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307663

Wollstonecraft, Mary. 2001. A vindication of the Rights of Woman: with strictures on political and moral subjects. Nova York, The Modern Library.