Wage discrimination of workers with disabilities in Brazil
An intersectional analysis by gender and race/color
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2022.1.41686Keywords:
Labor market, Wage discrimination, Persons with disabilities, Gender, Race/ColorAbstract
This paper investigates wage discrimination against workers with disabilities, as well as its interactions with other social markers of inequality, gender and race/color, using data from the 2010 Demographic Census (IBGE). Four types of disability are investigated: visual, hearing, motor, and mental. A multivariate regression model controlling for occupational fixed effects was used. The results indicate that there is wage discrimination for the four types of disability analyzed. It is observed that the greatest discrimination occurs for workers with severe visual impairment, followed by physical disabilities and, lastly, mental and hearing disabilities. However, such discrimination is of small magnitude when compared to other social markers of inequality, such as gender and race/color. The effect of gender, for example, is six times greater than that of visual impairment while non-white people suffer almost four times more discrimination. When considering the accumulation of the social markers of inequality, disability, gender, and race/ color, it is confirmed that black women with and without disabilities are those who suffer the most from wage discrimination in Brazil.
Downloads
References
Almeida, Philippe O. e Luana A. Araújo. 2020. DisCrit: os limites da interseccionalidade para pensar sobre a pessoa negra com deficiência. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas 10 (2): 611-641. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v10i2.6861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v10i2.6861
Ávila, Maria Betânia de M. 2013. A dinâmica do trabalho produtivo e reprodutivo: uma contradição viva no cotidiano das mulheres. In Mulheres Brasileiras e gênero nos espaços públicos e privado, organizado por Gustavo Venturi e Tatau Godinho, 231-243. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Collins, Patricia H. 1998. It’s all in the family: intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia 13 (3): 62-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x
Crenshaw, Kimberlé . 1994. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence, organizado por Martha Albertson Fineman e Rixanne Mykitiuk, 93-118. New York: Routledge.
Diniz, Débora. 2007. O que é deficiência. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.
Gesser, Marivete, Adriano H. Nuernberg e Maria Juracy F. Tonelli. 2012. A contribuição do modelo social da deficiência à psicologia social. Psicologia & Sociedade 24 (3): 557-566. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822012000300009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822012000300009
Gomes, Ruthie B., Paula Helena Lopes, Marivete Gesser e Maria Juracy F. Toneli. 2019. Novos diálogos dos estudos feministas da deficiência. Revista Estudos Feministas 27 (1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2019v27n148155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9584-2019v27n148155
Kantola, Johanna, Emanuela Lombardo, orgs. 2017. Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, institutions and intersectionality. London: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50778-1
Kymlicka, Will. 2020. Multicultural citizenship. In The new social theory reader, organizado por Steven Seidman e Jeffrey C. Alexander, 270-280. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060963-44
Neri, Marcelo, Alexandre Pinto, Wagner Soares e Hessia Costilla. 2003. Retratos da deficiência no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV.
Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice: revised edition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
Shakespeare, Tom. 2014. Disability rights and wrongs revisited. 2 ed. Londres: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887456
Shakespeare, Tom. 1996. Disability, identity and difference. In Exploring the divide, organizado por Colin Barnes e Geof Mercer, 94-113. Leeds: The Disability Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1994. Multiculturalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Walby, Sylvia. 2007. Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the social sciences 37 (4): 449-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307663
Walby, Sylvia, Jo Armstrong e Sofia Strid. 2012. Intersectionality: multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology 46: 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164
Walzer, Michael. 2003. Esferas da justiça: uma defesa do pluralismo e da igualdade. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Civitas: journal of Social Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).