On repopulating narratives:
The work of digital influencers from a socio-technical approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2021.2.39918Keywords:
Digital influencers, Literature review, Actor-network theoryAbstract
The present study aimed to elaborate a narrative review of the literature on digital influencers and to suggest an analysis inspired by the field of Science and Technology Studies. The thematic literature maintains the explanatory axis of research centered on the figure of the influencer as a producer of action and a user of digital technologies. However, I argue it is possible to perceive the construction of influence on digital platforms as an effect of a vast network of heterogeneous elements and not of just one or more subjects. I propose the work of influencers is only possible when this sociotechnical network is mobilized in such a way that it would be interesting from an analytical point to describe it. The advantages of this approach would be to find answers about how these connections happen and to point to other ways of understanding the associations between subjects and technical mediations.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Crystal. 2015. Communicative intimacies: influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology 8: 1-16.
Abidin, Crystal. 2016. Visibility labour: engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia 161 (1): 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177.
Abidin, Crystal. 2018. Internet celebrity: understanding fame online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787560765.
Abidin, Crystal e Issaaf. Karhawi. 2021. Influenciadores digitais, celebridades da internet e ‘blogueirinhas’: uma entrevista com Crystal Abidin. Intercom, Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Comun. 44 (1): 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-
Bishop, Sophie. 2019. Managing visibility on Youtube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society 21 (11-12): 2589-2606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819854731.
Bruno, Fernanda. 2012. Rastros digitais sob a perspectiva da teoria ator-rede. Revista FAMECOS 19 (3): 681- 704. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2012.3.12893.
Bucher, Taina. 2017. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.
Cardoso, Vânia. Z. e Scott C. Head. 2013. Encenações da descrença: a performance dos espíritos e a presentificação do real. Revista de Antropologia 56 (2): 257-89. https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2013.82469.
Christin, Angèle. 2017. Algorithms in practice: comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data & Society 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717718855.
Cormode, Graham e Balachander Krishnamurthy. 2008. Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday 13 (6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125.
Cotter, Kelly. 2018. Playing the visibility game: how digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society 21 (4): 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915598180.
Duffy, Brooke E. 2017. (Not) getting paid to do what you love: gender, social media, and aspirational work. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300218176.001.0001
Duffy, Brooke E. 2020. Social media influencers. In The international encyclopedia of gender, media, and communication, organizado por Karen Ross, Cosimo Marco Scarcelli, Ingrid Bachmann, Sujata Moorti, Valentina Cardo. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119429128.iegmc219.
Flisfeder, Matthew. 2015. The entrepreneurial subject and the objectivization of the self in social media. South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (3): 553-570. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3130745.
Goffman, Erving. 1992. A representação do eu na vida cotidiana. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Hearn, Alison. 2008. Meat, mask, burden: probing the contours of the branded self. Journal of Consumer Culture 8 (2): 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508090086.
Hearn, Alison e Stephanie Schoenhoff. 2015. From celebrity to influencer: tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream. In A companion to celebrity, organizado por P. David Marshall e Sean Redmond, 194-212. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118475089.ch11.
Karhawi, Issaaaf. 2016. Influenciadores digitais: o Eu como mercadoria. In Tendências em comunicação digital, organizado por Elizabeth Saad e Stefanie C. Silveira, 38-58. São Paulo: ECA-USP. https://doi.org/10.11606/9788572051569.
Karhawi, Issaf. 2017. Influenciadores digitais: conceitos e práticas em discussão. Revista Communicare 17: 46-61.
Latour, B. 2012. Reagregando o social: uma introdução à teoria do ator-rede.São Paulo: Edusc.
Marwick, Alice. 2015. Instafame: luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture 27 1 (75): 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2798379.
Marwick, Alice e Danah Boyd. 2011a. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13 (1): 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.
Marwick, Alice e Danah Boyd. 2011b. To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17 (2): 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539.
Petry, Dalila. 2016. Revisitando o Floresta Digital: notas sobre o esforço de uma descrição sociotécnica. In Políticas etnográficas no campo da cibercultura, organizado por Theophilos Rifiotis e Jean Segata, 153-189. Brasília: ABA.
Poell, Thomas, David Nieborg e José van Dijck. 2020. Plataformização. Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos 22 (1): 2-10. https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2020.221.01.
Rifiotis, Theophilos. 2016. Etnografia no ciberespaço como ‘repovoamento’ e explicação. In Políticas etnográficas no campo da cibercultura, organizado por Theóphilos Rifiotis e Jean Segata, 129-151. Brasília: ABA.
Seaver, Nick. 2017. Algorithms as culture: some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Civitas – Journal of Social Sciences
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for printed and digital publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite this journal as the site of original publication. As the journal is of open access, the articles are allowed for free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source (please see the Creative Commons License at the bottom of this page).